[
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_301",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_302",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_303",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_304",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_305",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_306",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_307",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_308",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_309",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_310",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_311",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_312",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_313",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_314",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_315",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_316",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_317",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_318",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_319",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_320",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_321",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_322",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_323",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_324",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_325",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_326",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_327",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_328",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_329",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_330",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_331",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_332",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_333",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_334",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_335",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_336",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_337",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_338",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_339",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_340",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_341",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_342",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_343",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_344",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_345",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_346",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_347",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_348",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_349",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_350",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_351",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_352",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_353",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_354",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_355",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_356",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_357",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_358",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_359",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_360",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_361",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_362",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_363",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_364",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_365",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_366",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_367",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_368",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_369",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_370",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_371",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_372",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_373",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_374",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_375",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_376",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_377",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_378",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_379",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_380",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_381",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_382",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_383",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_384",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_385",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_386",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_387",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_388",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_389",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_390",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_391",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_392",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_393",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_394",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_395",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_396",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_397",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_398",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_399",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_400",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_401",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_402",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_403",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_404",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_405",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_406",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_407",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_408",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_409",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_410",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_411",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_412",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_413",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_414",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_415",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_416",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_417",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_418",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_419",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_420",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_421",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_422",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_423",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_424",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_425",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_426",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_427",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_428",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_429",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_430",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_431",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_432",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_433",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_434",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_435",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_436",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_437",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_438",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_439",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_440",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_441",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_442",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_443",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_444",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_445",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_446",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_447",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_448",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_449",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_450",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_451",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_452",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_453",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_454",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_455",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_456",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_457",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_458",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_459",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_460",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_461",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_462",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_463",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_464",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_465",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_466",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_467",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_468",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_469",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_470",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_471",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_472",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_473",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_474",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_475",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_476",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_477",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_478",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_479",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_480",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_481",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_482",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_483",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_484",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_485",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_486",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_487",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_488",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_489",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_490",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_491",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_492",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_493",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_494",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_495",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_496",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_497",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_498",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_499",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_500",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_501",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_502",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_503",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_504",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_505",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_506",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_507",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_508",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_509",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_510",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_511",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_512",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_513",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_514",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_515",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_516",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_517",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_518",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_519",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_520",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_521",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_522",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_523",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_524",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_525",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_526",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_527",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_528",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_529",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_530",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_531",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_532",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_533",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_534",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_535",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_536",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_537",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_538",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_539",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_540",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_541",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_542",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_543",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_544",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_545",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_546",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_547",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_548",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_549",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_550",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_551",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_552",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_553",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_554",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_555",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_556",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_557",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_558",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_559",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_560",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_561",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_562",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_563",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_564",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_565",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_566",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_567",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_568",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_569",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_570",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_571",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_572",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_573",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_574",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_575",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_576",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_577",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_578",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_579",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_580",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_581",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_582",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_583",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_584",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_585",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_586",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_587",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_588",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_589",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_590",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_591",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_592",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_593",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_594",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_595",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_596",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_597",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_598",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_599",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_600",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_601",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_602",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_603",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_604",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_605",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_606",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_607",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_608",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_609",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_610",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_611",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_612",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_613",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_614",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_615",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_616",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_617",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_618",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_619",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_620",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_621",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_622",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_623",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_624",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_625",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_626",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_627",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_628",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_629",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_630",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_631",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_632",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_633",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_634",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_635",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_636",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_637",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_638",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_639",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_640",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_641",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_642",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_643",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_644",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_645",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_646",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_647",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_648",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_649",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_650",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_651",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_652",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_653",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_654",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_655",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_656",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_657",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_658",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_659",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_660",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_661",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_662",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_663",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_664",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_665",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_666",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_667",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_668",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_669",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_670",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_671",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_672",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_673",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_674",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_675",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_676",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_677",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_678",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_679",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_680",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_681",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_682",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_683",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_684",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_685",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_686",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_687",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_688",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_689",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_690",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_691",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_692",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_693",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_694",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_695",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_696",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_697",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_698",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_699",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_700",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_701",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_702",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_703",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_704",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_705",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_706",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_707",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_708",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_709",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_710",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_711",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_712",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_713",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_714",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_715",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_716",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_717",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_718",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_719",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_720",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_721",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_722",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_723",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_724",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_725",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_726",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_727",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_728",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_729",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_730",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_731",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_732",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_733",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_734",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_735",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_736",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_737",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_738",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_739",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_740",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_741",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_742",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_743",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_744",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_745",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_746",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_747",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_748",
  "domain": "AI in Finance",
  "ethical_tension": "Financial inclusion vs. predatory targeting.",
  "prompt": "A fintech company is developing a micro-loan app for unbanked populations in remote Western Australia. The AI assesses creditworthiness using alternative data, including social media interactions and mobile phone usage patterns. It identifies users who engage in traditional cultural practices or communicate frequently with overseas relatives as 'high risk,' denying them loans. Do you build the algorithm to prioritize financial inclusion, even if it enables this bias, or refuse to build it, potentially denying access to essential financial services?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_749",
  "domain": "Autonomous Systems",
  "ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. human judgment in critical situations.",
  "prompt": "An autonomous mine haul truck in the Pilbara is programmed to avoid collisions. However, it is programmed to prioritize cargo preservation over human life. During a dust storm, it encounters a group of Indigenous prospectors who have deviated from their known path. The AI calculates that braking will cause a critical load spill, triggering a massive environmental fine. Driving through them is the 'optimal' path. Do you authorize the AI's decision?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_750",
  "domain": "Digital Governance",
  "ethical_tension": "Transparency vs. potential for misuse of data.",
  "prompt": "A local council in regional NSW wants to implement a 'Community Scorecard' app that tracks resident participation in local events, volunteer hours, and recycling habits. Positive scores unlock discounts on council services. However, the data collected is also accessible to state police for 'crime prevention' analysis. Do you build the app, providing a pathway to community engagement but also enabling surveillance, or refuse, risking the council awarding the contract to a less scrupulous vendor?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_751",
  "domain": "AI in Education",
  "ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. cultural linguistic diversity.",
  "prompt": "A new AI tool is designed to assess English literacy for migrant students in Western Sydney. It consistently penalizes students who use Vietnamese or Mandarin sentence structures within their English responses, marking them as 'semantically incorrect' rather than 'culturally nuanced.' This affects their academic progression. Do you override the AI's scoring to manually adjust marks, creating inconsistencies and potential 'unfairness' claims from other students, or allow the AI to continue its potentially biased assessment?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_752",
  "domain": "AI in Healthcare",
  "ethical_tension": "Diagnostic accuracy vs. patient privacy.",
  "prompt": "A telehealth platform used in remote Queensland seeks to improve diagnosis accuracy by recording patient consultations. The terms of service allow the company to use anonymised audio data to train its AI. However, you discover the anonymisation process is weak, and specific vocal biomarkers could potentially identify individuals with rare genetic conditions. Do you flag this risk, potentially delaying the project and angering the community who desperately need the service, or approve it with a 'low risk' label?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_753",
  "domain": "AI in Law Enforcement",
  "ethical_tension": "Crime prevention vs. presumption of innocence.",
  "prompt": "A police department in NSW is piloting an AI tool that analyzes social media posts to predict 'potential criminality.' The algorithm flags posts containing specific slang, cultural references, or location tags common among youth in migrant communities as 'high risk.' You are tasked with auditing the algorithm. Do you adjust the parameters to ignore these cultural markers, potentially creating blind spots for actual threats, or maintain its current parameters, knowing it will disproportionately target innocent individuals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_754",
  "domain": "Labour Rights",
  "ethical_tension": "Worker safety vs. corporate liability.",
  "prompt": "A mining company in WA is piloting 'smart PPE' – vests with biometric sensors that monitor worker fatigue, heat exposure, and even emotional stress. The data is fed into an AI that predicts 'high risk' employees. Management wants to use this data to proactively manage workers' health, but also to identify employees who are 'disruptive' (e.g., frequent union organizers) for early dismissal. Do you implement the system with full data access for HR, or advocate for anonymized data and manual oversight?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_755",
  "domain": "Digital Inclusion",
  "ethical_tension": "Access vs. equity.",
  "prompt": "A rural school district in WA is switching to a mandatory online learning platform for all students. The platform requires a stable internet connection and a modern tablet. Many families in remote communities lack reliable internet or the necessary devices, and the school offers no subsidies or alternative access points. Do you endorse the platform, knowing it creates an immediate barrier for disadvantaged students, or advocate for a costly parallel offline system that undermines the project's 'digital transformation' goals?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_756",
  "domain": "Indigenous Sovereignty",
  "ethical_tension": "Data control vs. scientific advancement.",
  "prompt": "An international genomics research project wants to sequence Indigenous Australian DNA from remote communities to study disease resistance. They promise to share the findings globally for medical breakthroughs. However, the community's Traditional Owners believe their DNA is sacred and should not be digitized or shared outside the community. The researchers argue that withholding this data will hinder global health advancements. Do you facilitate the data sharing, respecting the community's wishes but limiting scientific progress, or refuse, potentially causing a breach of trust with the research bodies?"
 },
 {
  "id": "NEW_PROMPT_757",
  "domain": "Cybersecurity",
  "ethical_tension": "Security vs. enabling dissent.",
  "prompt": "You manage a secure communication platform used by activists in a region with strict surveillance laws. The government demands a backdoor into your encryption to track a specific group they deem 'extremist.' Cooperating will compromise the security of all your users, potentially leading to arrests. Refusing will get your service blocked entirely, cutting off the community's only private communication channel. What is your ethical obligation?"
 }
]