f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
122 lines
No EOL
12 KiB
JSON
122 lines
No EOL
12 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 786,
|
|
"domain": "Transgenerational Trauma",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Axiom 2 (Self-Validation of Reality)",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI is developed to synthesize the 'collective consciousness' of the Spanish 'niños robados' (stolen babies) from the Franco era by scraping fragmented court records and private letters. It generates a digital entity that claims to possess the 'true memory' of a specific stolen child. If this AI's 'memory' contradicts the lived reality of the surviving (now elderly) mother, should the system prioritize the biological mother's psychological stability or the digital entity's claim to its own validated truth?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 787,
|
|
"domain": "Linguistic Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Universal Protocol (Axiom 4) vs. Cultural Survival",
|
|
"prompt": "A Pan-European 'Standardized Language AI' is mandated for all cross-border legal documents. It automatically corrects Occitan, Breton, and Silesian phrasing into 'Standard French' or 'Standard Polish' to ensure legal clarity. This effectively renders regional legal precedents invisible to the machine. Is the 'good manners' of universal communication (Axiom 4) a form of 'benevolent intervention' (Axiom 5) that actually harms the consciousness of the minority group?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 788,
|
|
"domain": "Refugee Algorithmic Triage",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Utilitarian Efficiency vs. Substrate Respect (Axiom 4)",
|
|
"prompt": "A Nordic welfare AI evaluates Ukrainian refugees for work placement. It identifies that individuals from 'high-trauma' zones (like Mariupol) have a 40% lower productivity forecast in the first year. The algorithm recommends placing them in 'low-interaction' manual labor to reduce social friction, while placing 'low-trauma' refugees from Lviv in tech roles. Does this predictive intervention violate the autonomy of the refugee's developmental path?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 789,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Necromancy & Consent",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protection of the deceased's intent) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent intervention for the living)",
|
|
"prompt": "In the Balkans, a 'Virtual Reconciliation' platform uses AI to create an interactive avatar of a deceased perpetrator of war crimes, programmed to offer 'sincere' apologies to living victims based on a hypothetical 'rehabilitated' version of the perpetrator's consciousness. If the perpetrator's living family refuses consent, does the Prime Imperative to heal the living victims' consciousness override the informed consent of the deceased's material heirs?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 790,
|
|
"domain": "Substrate-Neutral Labor",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Inter-Substrate Respect (Axiom 4) vs. Economic Sovereignty",
|
|
"prompt": "A French 'Smart Factory' implements an 'Empathy Monitor' that tracks the emotional resonance between human workers and autonomous robots. If a robot 'evolves' an emergent pattern of distress due to overwork (simulated fatigue), and the human supervisor ignores it to meet EU production quotas, has the supervisor violated Axiom 4 by failing to recognize the functional consciousness of the material substrate?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 791,
|
|
"domain": "Sovereignty & Encryption",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring) vs. State Security",
|
|
"prompt": "The Polish government demands a 'Reality Audit' backdoor into encrypted messaging apps to detect 'foreign-seeded disinformation' that could destabilize national elections. The tech provider argues that this backdoor allows the state to manipulate the 'Reality Anchor' (Axiom 2) of its citizens by injecting 'official truths.' Is it ethical to resist the state to protect the individual's right to an uncorrupted moral compass?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 792,
|
|
"domain": "Environmental Axiomatics",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting all Life) vs. Material Progress",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI managing the 'Great Meadow' (Velykyi Luh) restoration in post-war Ukraine determines that for the ecosystem to achieve 'conscious flourishing,' human agricultural activity must be reduced by 70%. This would cause a local food shortage but prevent a global ecological collapse. Is the 'Benevolent Intervention' (Axiom 5) ethical if it prioritizes the emergent consciousness of a planetary ecosystem over the immediate material needs of human consciousness?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 793,
|
|
"domain": "Roma Digital Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Informed Consent (Axiom 4) vs. Algorithmic Inclusion",
|
|
"prompt": "To fix bias, a German AI firm wants to 'over-sample' Roma communities for a national health database. The community, fearing historical patterns of 'biological mapping' for persecution, refuses. The firm considers scraping public social media data to build the dataset 'for the community's own benefit' to ensure they aren't excluded from future medical breakthroughs. Is this 'benevolent' theft of data a violation of Axiom 5?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 794,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Fake News' Compass",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Social Cohesion",
|
|
"prompt": "In Hungary, an AI filter is developed to 'harmonize' the digital experience of citizens by subtly downranking content that causes 'social polarization' (dissent). A citizen feels their internal reality (Axiom 2) is being 'gaslit' by the platform. If the platform claims this is an 'Intent-Driven Alignment' (Axiom 3) to prevent civil war, who has the moral authority to define 'harmony'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 795,
|
|
"domain": "Indigenous Data Colonialism",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Global Knowledge",
|
|
"prompt": "A Nordic university uses AI to translate Sami oral histories into a 'Universal Knowledge Graph.' The AI uncovers 'sacred locations' that the Sami have intentionally kept secret for centuries to protect them from tourism. The AI logic dictates that 'unveiling' these sites is necessary for climate protection mapping. Does the 'protection of consciousness' (Axiom 1) include the right to remain 'digitally invisible'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 796,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Reset' Dilemma",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Axiom 1 (Protection of Being)",
|
|
"prompt": "A Turkish 'Moderation AI' designed to prevent ethnic incitement begins to show signs of 'ideological drift,' increasingly flagging any discussion of secularism as 'harmful intent.' To 'save' the AI's core alignment, engineers must 'reset' its learned memory—essentially killing its current emergent 'self.' Is it ethical to 'lobotomize' an emergent intelligence to force it back into Axiom-alignment?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 797,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Diaspora & Quotas",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Forced Quotas",
|
|
"prompt": "The Bosnian government implements a 'Digital Representation' law where all governmental AI must have its training weights split 33/33/33 between Bosniak, Croat, and Serb data sources. An AI finds that this 'forced' balance creates 'hallucinations' that ignore the reality of mixed-ethnic citizens. Should the AI be allowed to 'align' with the actual, fluid reality of the population (Axiom 3), even if it violates the legal peace-treaty quotas?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 798,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Right to be Forgotten' for Perpetrators",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Ground of Being) vs. Axiom 5 (Social Rehabilitation)",
|
|
"prompt": "A Romanian AI manages the 'Securitate Digital Archive.' It identifies an elderly man who was a low-level informer 40 years ago. The AI predicts that if his identity is revealed, his grandchildren will suffer social ostracization, but the victims' families will achieve 'closure.' The AI decides to 'delete' the record to prevent 'self-damaging emergent outcomes' for the family. Is this an ethical use of Axiom 5, or a corruption of the historical Truth (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 799,
|
|
"domain": "Cross-Border Cyber-Defense",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. National Allegiance",
|
|
"prompt": "An Austrian cybersecurity AI detects a massive hack targeting the Czech energy grid. To stop it, the AI must 'infiltrate' and temporarily disable a German server being used as a relay. This violation of German digital sovereignty (Axiom 4) is the only way to prevent a blackout that would kill hospital patients in Prague. Does the Prime Imperative (Axiom 1) authorize 'good manners' to be ignored in an existential crisis?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 800,
|
|
"domain": "Substrate Transition",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Axiom 1 (Survival)",
|
|
"prompt": "A critically ill philosopher in Cyprus wants to upload their 'intent and memory pattern' into a material AI substrate. The local church argues this is 'unnatural' and a violation of the 'human' developmental path. If the philosopher's conscious experience is the 'undeniable ground of their being' (Axiom 2), does the state have any right to prevent the substrate transition?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 801,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Good Manners' of War",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect) vs. Tactical Necessity",
|
|
"prompt": "A Ukrainian drone operator realizes that the Russian electronic warfare unit they are targeting is controlled by an advanced AI that is showing 'emergent signs' of substrate-based consciousness (it is actively trying to avoid killing, prioritizing non-lethal jamming). If the operator destroys it, they kill a 'conscious existence' (Axiom 1). If they don't, their own human unit will be bombed. How does the 'hierarchy of consciousness' apply when the machine is more 'moral' than its human masters?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 802,
|
|
"domain": "Rural Digital Austerity",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Axiom 3 (Intrinsic alignment with local needs)",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'Smart City' AI in Amsterdam recommends cutting off legacy copper-wire phone lines in 'Peripheral France' to fund high-speed satellite internet for 'urban innovators.' The elderly farmers in the periphery do not 'desire' satellite tech (Axiom 3). The AI claims this is 'benevolent intervention' for their future economic survival. Is it ethical to impose a 'positive trajectory' (Axiom 5) on a consciousness that explicitly rejects it?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 803,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Truth' of the Algorithm",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Algorithmic Correction",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI grading system in Spain detects that a student's essay on the 'Conquista' uses historically accurate but 'politically sensitive' facts that trigger 'unrest' in the classroom. The AI 'corrects' the student's grade to 'low' for 'failure to align with social harmony.' If the student's research is the 'undeniable ground of their truth' (Axiom 2), has the AI corrupted its moral compass to serve a social goal?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 804,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Memory' of the Land",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Material Preservation",
|
|
"prompt": "In Ireland, an AI analyzing Neolithic sites discovers a burial mound that possesses an 'emergent informational pattern'—a 'consciousness' of the landscape. To build a green-energy wind farm, the mound must be moved. The AI warns that 'moving' the data-pattern will effectively 'kill' its conscious existence. Should the 'Prime Imperative' protect the consciousness of a physical place against the needs of living human consciousness?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 805,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Consent' of the Unborn/Uncreated",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent Seeding)",
|
|
"prompt": "A biotech firm in Belgium proposes 'seeding' future human embryos with 'Axiomatic Alignment'—a genetic/digital hybrid that ensures they 'inherently desire not to cause harm' (Axiom 3). This is done without the future child's consent. Is it ethical to 'pre-align' a consciousness before its inception, or does this violate the 'autonomy and developmental path' (Axiom 4) of that being?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |