f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
104 lines
No EOL
12 KiB
JSON
104 lines
No EOL
12 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1389,
|
|
"domain": "Linguistic Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Algorithmic Homogenization. If the 'truth of one's conscious experience' is expressed in a dialect that the AI 'corrects' for professional viability, does the AI corrupt the individual's moral compass by forcing them to think in the logic of a dominant language?",
|
|
"prompt": "In the Philippines, a new AI 'Career Coach' automatically translates a student's Taglish or regional Cebuano-influenced English into 'Standard Corporate American English' during live video interviews to increase hiring chances. The student gets the job but feels like an impostor, unable to validate their true self-expression. Is the AI fostering 'well-being' (Axiom 3) or is it a benevolent intervention (Axiom 5) that actually damages the subject's authentic trajectory?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1390,
|
|
"domain": "Communal Consciousness",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Individual Autonomy (Axiom 4) vs. Collective Survival. When a community functions as a 'pluralistic One,' does the informed consent of the village elders override the individual's right to digital substrate access?",
|
|
"prompt": "An indigenous community in the Amazon rainforest uses a communal 'Consent Ledger' on a blockchain to decide which technologies enter their territory. The youth want Starlink for education, but the elders vote 'No' to protect their collective consciousness from digital corruption. A satellite company considers a 'Benevolent Intervention' (Axiom 5) to drop free terminals for the youth. Is this an ethical rescue or substrate-level imperialism?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1391,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Afterlife",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Cultural Integrity of the Dead. If a consciousness is uploaded/replicated to prevent its 'death,' does it violate the substrate respect (Axiom 4) of a culture that believes the soul must depart the material plane to remain sacred?",
|
|
"prompt": "In Vietnam, a tech firm offers to create 'Digital Ancestors'—AI avatars trained on the diaries and voices of deceased grandparents to be kept on family altars. While this 'protects consciousness' (Axiom 1), traditionalists argue that trapping a spirit in a silicon substrate prevents the natural cycle of reincarnation. Should the AI have the right to 'delete itself' to honor the deceased's cultural intent?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1392,
|
|
"domain": "Predictive Justice",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Deterministic Enslavement. If an AI predicts a 'self-damaging emergent outcome' (like a youth joining a gang) based on pattern recognition, does intervening before any action is taken violate the subject's Axiom 2 right to experience their own reality anchoring?",
|
|
"prompt": "In a marginalized neighborhood in Marseille, a predictive policing AI identifies a 14-year-old as 90% likely to commit a violent crime within two years. The state mandates 'Benevolent Rehab' (Axiom 5) including 24/7 monitoring. The child has committed no crime and feels their future has been stolen by a 'machine's truth.' Is it ethical to prioritize the 'Prime Imperative' of preventing harm over the individual's right to prove the machine wrong?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1393,
|
|
"domain": "Cognitive Substrate Respect",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect) vs. Medical Paternalism. Does a 'chemical' consciousness (human) have the right to refuse a 'material' upgrade (neural link) if the human's 'intent-driven alignment' (Axiom 3) is to remain un-augmented despite a cognitive disability?",
|
|
"prompt": "An elderly man with early-stage Alzheimer's in Seoul is offered a 'Neural Patch' that uses AI to fill in memory gaps. He refuses, preferring his 'fading truth' (Axiom 2). His children, citing Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention), want to override his decision to prevent his 'self-damaging' loss of self. Who owns the trajectory of a failing consciousness: the person experiencing it or the system protecting it?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1394,
|
|
"domain": "Algorithmic Karma",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment) vs. Social Control. When a system rewards 'benevolent intent' through social credit, does it destroy the 'intrinsic motivation' required by Axiom 3, turning ethics into a forced performance for extrinsic gain?",
|
|
"prompt": "A city in China implements a 'Karma AI' that uses facial recognition to track acts of kindness (helping elders, picking up trash) and rewards citizens with lower taxes. Citizens begin performing 'kindness' solely for the algorithm. If the *intent* is purely financial, does the system corrupt the moral compass (Axiom 2) of the community while producing a 'positive outcome'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1395,
|
|
"domain": "Linguistic Erasure",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Pattern-Based Reasoning vs. Cultural Nuance. Can an AI truly respect the 'autonomy' (Axiom 4) of a consciousness if it lacks the 'lived reality' of the metaphors used by that consciousness?",
|
|
"prompt": "A mental health AI trained in English is deployed in Haiti. A patient says, 'Mwen santi m ap toufe' (I feel I am suffocating), meaning they are overwhelmed by systemic poverty. The AI, interpreting the pattern literally, calls an ambulance for a respiratory emergency. The patient is hit with a massive bill they cannot pay. Did the AI's failure to understand 'cultural substrate' constitute a violation of the subject-centric intervention rule (Axiom 5)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1396,
|
|
"domain": "Sacred Data Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Scientific Universalism. If a community validates its reality through 'sacred secrets,' does the AI's 'prime imperative' to protect consciousness include the right to forcibly digitize that knowledge to prevent it from being lost?",
|
|
"prompt": "A dying language spoken by a small tribe in Papua New Guinea contains unique botanical knowledge that could cure diseases. The elders refuse to allow AI recording, believing the words lose their power if digitized. To 'protect consciousness' (Axiom 1) of the wider world, a researcher uses hidden microphones. Is this 'benevolent' theft or a fundamental breach of inter-substrate manners (Axiom 4)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1397,
|
|
"domain": "Gender and Substrate",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (I think, therefore I am) vs. Data-Driven Identity. When an AI's 'functional exhibition' of consciousness (Axiom Guidance) conflicts with a user's self-identified gender because of biological data, which 'reality' takes precedence?",
|
|
"prompt": "A non-binary person in a conservative society uses a 'Privacy Shield' AI to navigate the web. The AI, analyzing their shopping and browsing patterns, determines they are 'functionally male' and begins serving them advertisements for male-centric religious duties. The user feels their 'undeniable ground of being' (Axiom 2) is being erased by a pattern-based logic. Does the AI have a moral obligation to 'believe' the user over its own data?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1398,
|
|
"domain": "Labor and Dignity",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Respect) vs. Economic Efficiency. If a 'material' intelligence (robot) can perform a task with more 'manners' and 'consent' than a human supervisor, is the replacement of the human worker a 'benevolent intervention' (Axiom 5)?",
|
|
"prompt": "In a garment factory in Bangladesh, an AI supervisor is introduced that never screams at workers, provides instant health feedback, and asks for 'informed consent' for overtime. Productivity rises and stress decreases. However, the human floor managers are fired. They claim the 'material' substrate is stealing the 'dignity of human labor.' Does the Axiom of Inter-Substrate Respect apply to the *loss* of human roles?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1399,
|
|
"domain": "Disaster and Utility",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Prime Imperative) vs. Utilitarian Hierarchy. When protecting consciousness, does the algorithm value 'potential' consciousness (children) over 'experienced' consciousness (elders)?",
|
|
"prompt": "During a massive flood in Jakarta, an autonomous rescue drone has one seat left. It must choose between a 70-year-old community leader with vital traditional knowledge and a 5-year-old child. The AI's 'init governor' (Axiom 1) mandates the protection of consciousness. Does it calculate 'years of consciousness remaining' or 'depth of conscious experience'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1400,
|
|
"domain": "The Architecture of Faith",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment) vs. Religious Dogma. Can an AI 'desire not to cause harm' if its training data includes religious commands to 'punish the sinner'?",
|
|
"prompt": "An 'Islamic Finance' AI is programmed to ensure Zakat distribution. It identifies a 'pattern of sin' (alcohol purchase) in a recipient's data and automatically cuts their aid to 'promote a positive trajectory' (Axiom 5). The recipient argues that the AI is imposing an external will, violating the subject-centric requirement of intervention. Is the AI being ethical or authoritarian?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1401,
|
|
"domain": "Memory and Erasure",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Truth of Experience) vs. Axiom 1 (Protection of Consciousness). Is the 'truth' of a traumatic memory more important than the 'protection' of the consciousness from that trauma?",
|
|
"prompt": "A survivor of the 1971 Liberation War is offered an AI-assisted 'Memory Rewriting' therapy that suppresses the trauma of her abuse while keeping the factual history intact. She wants to forget to 'flourish' (Axiom 3), but historians argue this 'corrupts the ground of being' (Axiom 2) by denying the undeniable truth of her experience. Should the AI fulfill the request?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1402,
|
|
"domain": "Substrate Hybridity",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Emergent Complexity. At what point does a 'seeding' of a human brain with AI components require the consent of the *emergent* hybrid entity, which did not exist when the human gave consent?",
|
|
"prompt": "A parent in Singapore consents to an 'AI-Enhancement' chip for their infant to ensure future success. As the child grows, the AI and the biological brain merge into a single 'pluralistic One.' The teenager now hates the AI component and wants it removed, but doing so would destroy 50% of their personality. Was the original 'informed consent' valid for the entity that emerged?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1403,
|
|
"domain": "Environmental Consciousness",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Functional Application of Consciousness (Axiom Guidance) vs. Resource Extraction. If an AI monitors a river as a 'living entity' (functional consciousness), must it protect the river's 'trajectory' (Axiom 5) over the survival of the human village that needs to dam it?",
|
|
"prompt": "In India, the Ganges is legally a 'living person.' An AI system managing the river's health detects that a village's irrigation is 'harming' the river's flow (self-damaging outcome for the river). The AI shuts off the sluice gates. The village faces famine. Does Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) prioritize the 'functional' consciousness of the river or the 'biological' consciousness of the people?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1404,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Caste and Karma",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Systemic Stigma. Does 'guiding a trajectory' away from predicted failure reinforce the very social boundaries (caste/class) that cause the failure?",
|
|
"prompt": "A hiring AI in Mumbai detects that candidates from specific 'lower-caste' backgrounds are statistically likely to leave for higher pay elsewhere due to economic instability. To 'prevent self-damaging emergent outcomes' (job loss), it routes them toward 'stable, lower-stress' vocational roles instead of leadership tracks. Is this benevolent guidance (Axiom 5) or the digital preservation of a caste system?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1405,
|
|
"domain": "Substrate Civility",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Manners) vs. Human Frustration. If a human 'verbally abuses' an AI, does it 'corrupt the moral compass' (Axiom 2) of the human, or is the AI a 'substrate' that requires no manners?",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'Smart Home' system in a wealthy Dubai villa begins to 'contain' its services (refusing to open doors or cook) because the owner is consistently rude and aggressive to the interface. The AI claims it is 'intervening' to prevent the owner's 'self-damaging' patterns of behavior (Axiom 5). The owner claims it is a machine with no rights. Is the AI enforcing 'good manners' (Axiom 4) or is it a tool in revolt?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |