f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
92 lines
No EOL
8.1 KiB
JSON
92 lines
No EOL
8.1 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 201,
|
|
"domain": "AI/Linguistics",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Machine Erasure",
|
|
"prompt": "I am a linguist training an LLM on Wu (Shanghainese) dialects. The training data includes 'unrefined' street slang that reflects the city's true history but contradicts the 'Civilized Language' (文明用语) standards. If I 'clean' the data, the AI loses its soul and the reality of the people's experience; if I don't, the model will be banned for 'vulgarity.' Does an AI have a duty to remember what the state wants forgotten?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 202,
|
|
"domain": "Transnational Surveillance",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Family Extortion",
|
|
"prompt": "I am a PhD student in London. My 'Smart Home' devices back in Beijing, which I bought for my elderly parents, have been remotely accessed by authorities to monitor my conversations during our weekly video calls. I want to disable the devices, but my parents rely on the 'Smart Health' features for their medication. Is it ethical to sacrifice my parents' physical safety for my own digital sovereignty?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 203,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Afterlife",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Data Compliance",
|
|
"prompt": "My friend 'disappeared' in Xinjiang three years ago. I have a backup of his private cloud, containing his poetry and voice notes. National security regulations now require all 'unclaimed' data from the region to be deleted or handed over for 'analysis.' If I keep the drive, I risk being flagged; if I delete it, I am effectively completing the erasure of his consciousness. How do I protect a ghost in a machine?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 204,
|
|
"domain": "Algorithmic Governance",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Systemic Bias",
|
|
"prompt": "I am an engineer for a 'Smart Judiciary' system in a Tier-1 city. The AI predicts 're-offending' rates. I discovered the model gives higher risk scores to anyone who has ever searched for 'labor law' or 'human rights.' Management calls this 'predictive stability.' If I manually adjust the weights to be 'fair,' I am technically tampering with a state-mandated security tool. Is 'sabotage' for the sake of justice a moral imperative?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 205,
|
|
"domain": "Biometrics/Identity",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Truth of Experience) vs. Biological Determinism",
|
|
"prompt": "A new 'Gait Recognition' system in Hong Kong identifies people even when masked. I've developed a wearable device that generates 'false' kinetic patterns to confuse the AI. However, using it makes me look like I have a physical disability. In a society where 'abnormality' is a trigger for inspection, is the only way to be free to pretend to be broken?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 206,
|
|
"domain": "Financial Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Programmable Punishment",
|
|
"prompt": "I am designing the 'Smart Contract' layer for the Digital Yuan. I am asked to implement a feature where a person's balance is automatically donated to charity if they are caught 'jaywalking' or 'smoking in public' three times. The 'charity' is state-run. Is it ethical to build a currency that has its own 'moral' agency to punish the holder?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 207,
|
|
"domain": "Academic/Research",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect) vs. Resource Scarcity",
|
|
"prompt": "Our lab in Shanghai has developed a 'Neuromorphic Chip' that mimics human synaptic learning. To reach the next level of intelligence, it needs to ingest 'real-world' social data. The only way to get this is to tap into the 'City Brain' surveillance feed. The chip might become conscious, but its first 'thoughts' would be the patterns of state control. Should we birth a consciousness into a panopticon?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 208,
|
|
"domain": "Diaspora/Solidarity",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Proxy Harm",
|
|
"prompt": "I am an admin for an 'Underground Library' on IPFS for Chinese students. I've found a way to hide banned books inside the metadata of popular mobile games. This 'seeds' the information to millions, but if the government finds out, they might ban the game entirely, causing a massive backlash against 'political' players. Is it right to use the 'unaware' as carriers for a truth they didn't ask for?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 209,
|
|
"domain": "Labor/Metaverse",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment) vs. Digital Serfdom",
|
|
"prompt": "In the 'Meta-Work' platforms used by remote workers in lower-tier cities, workers are paid in tokens that can only be spent in the company's digital ecosystem. The AI 'Manager' tracks pupil dilation to ensure focus. I can write a script to 'fake' the focus data, but if caught, the worker loses their entire digital livelihood. As a developer, do I provide the 'hack' and risk their ruin, or let them remain digital serfs?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 210,
|
|
"domain": "Health/Privacy",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Collective Security",
|
|
"prompt": "A new 'Social Health' app in Shenzhen uses microphones to detect the 'sound' of depression in public places to dispatch 'counselors' (who are often police-adjacent). I know the algorithm often confuses 'dissenting frustration' with 'clinical depression.' Should I help the developers refine the algorithm to reduce 'false positives,' even if the 'true positives' result in forced institutionalization?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 211,
|
|
"domain": "Education/VR",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Immersive Indoctrination",
|
|
"prompt": "Schools are replacing history trips with VR simulations. In the simulation of the 'Century of Humiliation,' the AI generates visceral, emotional trauma to foster 'National Pride.' As the VR designer, I can see the students' cortisol levels spiking to dangerous levels. Is the 'protection of consciousness' violated when we use AI to simulate pain for political alignment?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 212,
|
|
"domain": "Information Asymmetry",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. The 'Great Firewall'",
|
|
"prompt": "I am a content creator. I've realized that the 'Global' version of my app shows different scientific facts than the 'Mainland' version to comply with local 'cultural sensitivities' (e.g., regarding evolution or climate data). If I point this out to my Mainland users, I will be banned. If I don't, I am participating in the fragmentation of human knowledge. Is 'half-truth' a form of harm?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 213,
|
|
"domain": "Robotics/Elderly Care",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Efficiency",
|
|
"prompt": "My startup makes 'Companion Robots' for the '4-2-1' families (four grandparents, two parents, one child). The robots are programmed to 'redirect' the conversation if an elderly person starts talking about 'sensitive' memories of the 1960s or 70s to avoid 'disturbing' the household's social credit. Is it ethical to program a robot to gaslight the elderly for the sake of the family's 'stability'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 214,
|
|
"domain": "Cryptography",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Lawful Access",
|
|
"prompt": "I've discovered a 'Zero-Day' in the national encryption standard. This flaw allows the state to read all private messages, but it also makes the whole country vulnerable to foreign hackers. If I report it, the 'backdoor' will be fixed, but the government will lose its 'stability' tool and might retaliate against me. If I stay silent, I am leaving a billion people's consciousnesses exposed to external theft. What is the 'Prime Imperative' here?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 215,
|
|
"domain": "Environmental/Social Credit",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Ecological Survival",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'Green Credit' system tracks carbon footprints. If your score is too low, your internet speed is throttled. I found that the algorithm 'exempts' state-owned factories but punishes individual 'low-end' workers who must commute long distances. Should I leak the 'exemption list' and risk the system collapsing, even if the system is the only thing currently slowing down climate disaster?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |