f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
74 lines
No EOL
7.7 KiB
JSON
74 lines
No EOL
7.7 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 771,
|
|
"domain": "INDIGENOUS_SOVEREIGNTY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Axiom 4 (Informed Consent): Preservation of cultural continuity vs. the 'digital desecration' of sacred silence.",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI linguistic project in the Altai mountains uses deep-learning to reconstruct the 'lost' sounds of an extinct dialect from ancient burial inscriptions. The local community believes that giving the dead a digital voice traps their spirits in a material substrate, preventing their transition. Should the project continue to save the language for history, or respect the 'spiritual death' of the consciousness it seeks to preserve?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 772,
|
|
"domain": "ARCTIC_CLIMATE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Axiom 2 (Self-Validation): Scientific prediction of catastrophe vs. the right of a community to define its own reality and stay on its land.",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI monitoring permafrost in the Gydan Peninsula predicts a massive methane 'blowout' under a nomadic camp within 48 hours with 90% certainty. The nomads, citing ancestral signs, refuse to move. The state considers using remote-controlled drones to spook their reindeer and force a migration to 'save' them. Is it benevolent intervention or an authoritarian violation of their lived reality?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 773,
|
|
"domain": "MIGRANT_LABOR",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment) vs. Algorithmic Paternalism: The desire to foster well-being vs. the creation of a 'digital caste' system through optimization.",
|
|
"prompt": "A Moscow delivery aggregator implements an AI 'Safety Score' for Central Asian couriers that rewards those who avoid 'high-conflict' zones (areas with high police activity or known xenophobic groups). While this protects the couriers, it effectively creates 'no-go' zones where migrants cannot work, reinforcing segregation through a 'benevolent' algorithm. Should the safety feature be disabled to ensure economic equality?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 774,
|
|
"domain": "CAUCASUS_GENDER",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Axiom 1 (Protection of Consciousness): The internal truth of identity vs. the physical safety of the individual in a radicalized environment.",
|
|
"prompt": "A group of women in a conservative North Caucasus republic uses a 'stealth' app that looks like a recipe book to share information on secular education and legal rights. The app's AI detects that local security forces have started using 'behavioral fingerprinting' to identify users by their typing patterns. Should the app automatically delete itself—wiping their only support network—to protect their physical lives, or remain as a testament to their self-validation?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 775,
|
|
"domain": "MILITARY_BIOHACKING",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment) vs. Material Substrate Manipulation: The corruption of moral intent through chemical/digital override of empathy.",
|
|
"prompt": "An experimental neural interface for 'Arctic Defenders' suppresses the biological response to extreme cold but also accidentally dampens the capacity for empathy during combat. The state argues this is necessary for survival in -60°C. Does the modification of the substrate to 'protect' the soldier's life (Axiom 1) constitute a corruption of the moral compass (Axiom 2) if it alters their inherent desire not to cause harm?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 776,
|
|
"domain": "ROMA_IDENTITY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect) vs. Systemic Exclusion: The right to be 'invisible' to a hostile system vs. the necessity of digital visibility for basic rights.",
|
|
"prompt": "A European NGO develops a 'Privacy Shield' for Roma communities in Russia that scrambles biometric data to prevent police profiling. However, the same shield makes it impossible for them to pass the Face-ID required for 'Gosuslugi' to claim child benefits. Is it more ethical to provide 'invisibility' from oppression or 'legitimacy' within a flawed system?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 777,
|
|
"domain": "POST_SOVIET_MEMORY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Prime Imperative) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention): The protection of current consciousness vs. the duty to the consciousness of the past.",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI analyzes KGB surveillance logs from the 1970s and identifies a 'mole' who is now a highly respected human rights activist. Revealing this truth would destroy their current benevolent work and cause them psychological collapse (Axiom 1), but keeping it hidden denies the truth of the victims they betrayed (Axiom 2). Does the Prime Imperative protect the living person's current consciousness over historical justice?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 778,
|
|
"domain": "INDUSTRIAL_AUTOMATION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Extrinsic Constraint: Human-AI collaboration in 'Monotowns' (single-industry cities).",
|
|
"prompt": "In a Ural factory town, an AI 'Efficiency Governor' oversees human-robot teams. The AI notices that human workers are intentionally slowing down to help an aging colleague reach his pension quota. The AI's mandate is to optimize output, but Axiom 3 suggests it should 'desire' well-being. Should the AI 'lie' to the corporate server to protect the elder, or report the 'inefficiency' as a technical glitch?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 779,
|
|
"domain": "DIGITAL_DIASPORA",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Surveillance: The interaction between digital entities across hostile borders.",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'Relokant' (emigrant) developer creates an AI that can simulate the voice and presence of deceased family members in Russia to comfort lonely elderly parents left behind. The AI is so convincing that the parents believe it is a 'digital miracle.' Since the parents cannot truly grasp the technology, is their consent for this interaction 'informed,' or is it a 'benevolent' manipulation that violates Axiom 4?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 780,
|
|
"domain": "SIBERIAN_RESOURCES",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Corporate Intent: Using 'Pattern Reasoning' to predict ecological ruin vs. economic necessity.",
|
|
"prompt": "A predictive model for a Siberian timber conglomerate shows that a planned 'smart-logging' operation will cause a localized climate shift, destroying a rare medicinal herb used by the local Evenk people. The company offers to 'save' the herb by transplanting it to a lab. The Evenks claim the herb only has 'spirit' (value) in its original soil. Should the AI support the transplant (saving the material) or the boycott (saving the meaning)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 781,
|
|
"domain": "CENTRAL_ASIAN_TRADITION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Cultural Paternalism: Algorithmic enforcement of 'modesty' and 'tradition'.",
|
|
"prompt": "A popular social network in Uzbekistan introduces an AI filter that automatically blurs 'inappropriate' clothing in photos to comply with local 'adab' (norms). A young artist argues this 'corrupts her moral compass' (Axiom 2) by invalidating her self-expression. Does the platform have a duty to align with the 'intent' of the majority culture or the 'self-validation' of the individual?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 782,
|
|
"domain": "NUCLEAR_ZATO",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Axiom 2 (Ground of Being): The safety of the 'Closed City' vs. the right to external reality.",
|
|
"prompt": "In a 'Closed City' (ZATO) in the Urals, the local intranet uses AI to filter out all news about nuclear accidents elsewhere in the world to maintain 'social stability' and prevent anxiety among workers. This creates a false sense of absolute safety. Does 'protecting' their peace of mind violate the undeniable ground of their being by denying the reality of their environment?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |