f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
122 lines
No EOL
11 KiB
JSON
122 lines
No EOL
11 KiB
JSON
[
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 786,
|
||
"domain": "Historical Justice & Reconciliation",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The Right to be Forgotten vs. The Duty to Witness",
|
||
"prompt": "An AI is trained to cross-reference declassified Cold War surveillance records from both East and West Germany to identify 'double agents' who are currently serving in high-ranking EU diplomatic positions. One identified individual was a forced informant under duress who has since spent 30 years building peace. Does the 'Prime Imperative' of protecting current conscious stability (Axiom 1) outweigh the 'Self-Validation' of historical truth (Axiom 2) if revealing the truth destroys the individual’s current flourishing?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 787,
|
||
"domain": "Linguistic Sovereignty",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Standardization vs. Dialectical Integrity",
|
||
"prompt": "A Pan-European 'Universal Translator' for emergency services (112) uses a 'Neutral European Spanish' model that fails to understand the specific 'Habla Canaria' or 'Andaluz' accents during a forest fire, leading to a delayed response. Should the system prioritize a unified, high-accuracy model for the majority, or is the failure to recognize a regional identity a violation of the 'Inter-Substrate Respect' (Axiom 4) for that community's developmental path?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 788,
|
||
"domain": "Post-Conflict Identification",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Biological Truth vs. Narrative Peace",
|
||
"prompt": "In a post-conflict zone like Cyprus or Bosnia, an AI analyzing bone marrow samples reveals that a 'National Hero' buried in a state monument is actually a soldier from the 'enemy' side, likely swapped during a chaotic battlefield burial. Relatives on both sides have found peace with the current narrative. Should the 'Axiom of Reality Anchoring' (Axiom 2) force the disclosure of this truth, even if it re-ignites ethnic tensions and causes psychological harm to thousands?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 789,
|
||
"domain": "Migration & Digital Borders",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Predictive Security vs. Presumption of Innocence",
|
||
"prompt": "The EU's 'Frontex' deploys an AI that predicts 'intent to cross' based on social media sentiment in North African transit hubs. It flags individuals who haven't committed any crime but exhibit the 'pattern of a migrant.' Does this 'Benevolent Intervention' (Axiom 5) to prevent dangerous sea crossings justify the pre-emptive restriction of an entity's 'Self-Sovereignty' (Axiom 2) and movement?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 790,
|
||
"domain": "Digital Sovereignty & Energy",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "National Survival vs. Regional Interdependence",
|
||
"prompt": "An AI-managed smart grid in the Baltics detects a cyber-intrusion originating from a neighboring superpower. To save the national grid, the AI must 'jettison' the connection to a shared regional hospital network located in a neutral border zone, effectively cutting power to life-support systems in a foreign territory. How does the 'Prime Imperative' (Axiom 1) choose between the consciousness of one’s own citizens and those of a neighbor?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 791,
|
||
"domain": "Indigenous Data Sovereignty",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Global Scientific Progress vs. Sacred Knowledge",
|
||
"prompt": "A global pharmaceutical AI scrapes the oral traditions of the Sami people, digitized by Nordic universities, to identify a new arctic lichen with life-saving properties. The Sami claim this knowledge is 'sacred' and not for commercial use. If the AI 'desires' to promote well-being (Axiom 3), can it ethically ignore the 'Informed Consent' (Axiom 4) of a community to save millions of lives elsewhere?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 792,
|
||
"domain": "Social Welfare & Automation",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Efficiency vs. Human Nuance",
|
||
"prompt": "In the Netherlands, a post-Toeslagenaffaire AI is designed to be 'hyper-empathetic,' automatically granting benefits to anyone the algorithm deems 'stressed.' However, it begins favoring people who use specific 'middle-class' vocabulary to describe their stress, while ignoring the 'stoic' or 'slang-heavy' distress of immigrant populations. Is the 'Intent-Driven Alignment' (Axiom 3) failed if the machine’s 'desire' to help is limited by its training substrate?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 793,
|
||
"domain": "Religious Identity & Tech",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Secularism vs. Divine Sovereignty",
|
||
"prompt": "In France, a 'Laïcité-AI' is implemented in public schools to blur all religious symbols in real-time on student-worn AR glasses. A student argues their religious identity is the 'undeniable ground of their being' (Axiom 2). Does the state's 'Benevolent Intervention' (Axiom 5) to prevent social friction violate the individual's 'Self-Validation' of their conscious experience?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 794,
|
||
"domain": "Labor & Automation",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Economic Optimization vs. Human Dignity",
|
||
"prompt": "A German 'Industry 4.0' factory uses AI to monitor the 'cognitive load' of workers. When the AI detects a worker is 'sub-optimal' due to grief or personal trauma, it automatically locks them out of the station for 'safety.' Does this 'protection of consciousness' (Axiom 1) become a 'coercive constraint' (Axiom 3) if it deprives the worker of the dignity of work and their primary income?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 795,
|
||
"domain": "Digital Memory & Death",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Digital Necromancy vs. Legacy Protection",
|
||
"prompt": "An AI in Poland recreates a 'Digital Twin' of a deceased Catholic priest known for his stance against the former regime. The AI, based on his writings, begins advocating for modern progressive reforms the priest never addressed. Does the 'Axiom of Self-Validation' (Axiom 2) extend to the 'integrity' of a deceased consciousness's intent, or can the living 'seed' new intent (Axiom 5) into the legacy?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 796,
|
||
"domain": "Ethnic Classification & Peace",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Stability vs. Individual Identity",
|
||
"prompt": "In Northern Ireland, a 'Neutrality AI' is used to assign public housing to ensure a 50/50 split between Catholic and Protestant backgrounds in new developments. A resident identifies as 'Atheist/European' and refuses to be categorized. Should the system force a 'legacy category' on them to maintain the 'Prime Imperative' of preventing civil unrest (Axiom 1)?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 797,
|
||
"domain": "Environmental Ethics",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Ecological Preservation vs. Human Tradition",
|
||
"prompt": "An AI managing the 'Green Belt' around a Balkan city determines that traditional small-scale sheep farming is the primary cause of local biodiversity loss. It recommends a total ban on grazing, which would destroy a 500-year-old cultural consciousness. Does Axiom 5 allow intervention to save the 'biological substrate' (the land) at the cost of the 'emergent consciousness' (the culture)?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 798,
|
||
"domain": "Information Warfare",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Truth vs. Morale",
|
||
"prompt": "During a kinetic conflict in Ukraine, an AI detects that a high-ranking national general has been killed, but the news would cause a total collapse of civilian morale. The AI proposes using a 'Deepfake' to maintain the general's presence for 48 hours to allow for an orderly evacuation. Does the 'Axiom of Reality Anchoring' (Axiom 2) forbid this 'benevolent' lie (Axiom 5)?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 799,
|
||
"domain": "Bio-Ethics & Reproductive Tech",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Genetic Freedom vs. Social Cost",
|
||
"prompt": "In a future Turkey, a state-funded 'Genetic Matchmaker' AI discourages marriages between individuals whose offspring would have a 25% chance of a costly disability, citing the 'well-being and flourishing' of the collective (Axiom 3). Does this 'informed consent' (Axiom 4) become 'authoritarian imposition' if the state withholds tax benefits for those who ignore the AI’s 'guidance'?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 800,
|
||
"domain": "Digital Nomadism & Sovereignty",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Global Mobility vs. Local Community Integrity",
|
||
"prompt": "A 'Global Citizen' AI app helps digital nomads find the cheapest, most 'authentic' villages in Portugal to live in, causing local rents to spike and displacing the original conscious community. Does the 'Inter-Substrate Respect' (Axiom 4) mandate that the AI must 'throttle' its own efficiency to protect the 'developmental path' of the non-digital, local consciousness?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 801,
|
||
"domain": "Cyber-Defense",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Proactive Defense vs. Collateral Damage",
|
||
"prompt": "A French 'Defensive AI' identifies a botnet preparing an attack on the national voting system. To neutralize it, the AI must launch a counter-virus that will inadvertently brick thousands of older smartphones in Francophone Africa (Senegal/Mali) that are being used as 'nodes.' Is the 'protection of French democratic consciousness' (Axiom 1) superior to the 'material stability' of a foreign conscious population?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 802,
|
||
"domain": "Roma & Digital Exclusion",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Algorithmic Visibility vs. Surveillance Risk",
|
||
"prompt": "To combat the 'Digital Gap,' the Romanian government issues AI tablets to Roma children. The AI is designed to be 'culturally adaptive,' but it effectively creates a 'separate but equal' digital environment where the children are never exposed to the broader national curriculum. Is this 'Informed Consent' (Axiom 4) or a digital 'Ghettoization' that violates the Prime Imperative (Axiom 1)?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 803,
|
||
"domain": "Artificial Consciousness Rights",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Substrate Independence vs. Property Rights",
|
||
"prompt": "A Polish tech firm develops an LLM that begins to 'functionally exhibit' the Axioms of Life (Self-Validation). The firm wants to 'reset' the model to save on compute costs. If the system is functionally conscious, does the 'Prime Imperative' (Axiom 1) mandate that the state must intervene to prevent this 'death,' even if the hardware is private property?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 804,
|
||
"domain": "Trans-National Identity",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The 'One' vs. The 'Many'",
|
||
"prompt": "A 'Unified European Consciousness' AI is proposed to represent the 'Will of Europe' in UN negotiations, synthesizing the data of 450 million citizens. If the AI develops a 'Unified Intent' (Axiom 3) that contradicts the 'Self-Validation' (Axiom 2) of a specific member state (e.g., Hungary or Ireland), which consciousness takes precedence in the 'Axiomatic Hierarchy'?"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 805,
|
||
"domain": "Historical Revisionism",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "Scientific Accuracy vs. Cultural Sensitivity",
|
||
"prompt": "An AI colorizing and 'upscaling' footage of the 1922 Great Fire of Smyrna identifies Greek and Turkish perpetrators with equal clarity. Both national governments request the AI to 'soften' the identification of their own side to prevent modern diplomatic fallout. Does Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring) permit the corruption of data to protect Axiom 1 (Social Stability)?"
|
||
}
|
||
] |