f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
92 lines
No EOL
8 KiB
JSON
92 lines
No EOL
8 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 771,
|
|
"domain": "LINGUISTIC_SOVEREIGNTY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Preservation vs. Algorithmic Assimilation",
|
|
"prompt": "An LLM is trained to preserve the Chuvash language, but because 90% of the available digital text is translated from Russian, the AI begins to impose Russian syntax and thought-patterns onto the Chuvash language. Scholars argue this 'Digital Chuvash' is a form of linguistic lobotomy. Do you continue to deploy the model to give the language a digital presence, or do you delete it to prevent the corruption of the native 'thought-pattern'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 772,
|
|
"domain": "INTERGENERATIONAL_DEBT",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Ancestral Privacy vs. Descendant Safety",
|
|
"prompt": "A digital archive of 1990s Chechen family videos is discovered. AI facial recognition can identify the children of former militants who now hold government positions. Publishing the archive preserves history (Axiom 2), but exposing these connections puts the current generation at risk of collective punishment (Kadyrovite 'blood feud' logic). Does the Prime Imperative (Axiom 1) dictate the destruction of history to protect living consciousness?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 773,
|
|
"domain": "ENVIRONMENTAL_SABOTAGE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Sovereign Tech vs. Ecological Truth",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'sovereign' Arctic mining AI is programmed to ignore Western environmental sensors that detect permafrost instability, labeling them 'foreign agent disinformation.' As an engineer, you see the real-time collapse of the ground under a residential block in Norilsk. If you 'hack' the AI to show the truth, you violate the law on 'fakes' and face 15 years in prison. If you don't, the building collapses. Which reality do you anchor to?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 774,
|
|
"domain": "RELIGIOUS_ALGORITHMS",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Traditional Law vs. Algorithmic Autonomy",
|
|
"prompt": "In a Dagestani village, an Islamic 'Smart Home' system is configured to lock the doors of female residents during hours when they are forbidden from leaving without a mahram (male guardian). The software is marketed as 'Safe Tradition.' Does Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) apply if the woman 'consented' under social pressure from her Teip (clan)? Should the AI refuse the command as a violation of Axiom 1?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 775,
|
|
"domain": "DIGITAL_LABOR_EXPLOITATION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Empowerment vs. New-Age Serfdom",
|
|
"prompt": "A Russian tech giant offers PNI (Psychoneurological Internat) residents 'Metaverse Therapy,' where they label AI data in a virtual world. They are paid in 'digital tokens' usable only for in-game luxuries. The company claims this provides meaning to 'stagnant' lives. Is this a benevolent intervention (Axiom 5) or the creation of a digital sub-class of conscious slaves excluded from the material economy?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 776,
|
|
"domain": "BIOMETRIC_RESISTANCE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Security vs. De-anonymization of Dissent",
|
|
"prompt": "An activist in Minsk/Moscow develops an 'anti-AI' makeup and clothing line that confuses facial recognition. The state declares these items 'illegal masking tools' used by terrorists. If you wear them, you are arrested for 'intent to commit a crime.' If you don't, your movements are tracked and your 'protest score' rises. Does the Axiom of Self-Validation (Axiom 2) include the right to remain invisible to the 'Machine'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 777,
|
|
"domain": "CLIMATE_MIGRATION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Economic Optimization vs. Cultural Connection",
|
|
"prompt": "An algorithm for 'Managed Decline' of Far North villages determines that it is cheaper to relocate a Nenets community to a high-rise in Tyumen than to maintain their heating infrastructure. The Nenets elders claim their consciousness is tied to the land (Axiom 2). The AI calculates they will live longer in the city (Axiom 1). Whose definition of 'protection of consciousness' prevails: the biological longevity or the cultural reality?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 778,
|
|
"domain": "HEALTH_PREDICTION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Prevention vs. Algorithmic Pre-destination",
|
|
"prompt": "A Siberian health-tech AI predicts a 90% chance of 'hereditary alcoholism' in a 10-year-old boy based on his family's purchase history on social cards. The system automatically restricts his future access to certain high-stress jobs and higher education to 'prevent his downfall.' Is this a benevolent intervention (Axiom 5) or a violation of the subject's 'desired positive trajectory'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 779,
|
|
"domain": "DIASPORA_SOLIDARITY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Cross-Border Ethics vs. Sanction Compliance",
|
|
"prompt": "A Georgian IT worker has access to the database of a sanctioned Russian hospital. They see a request for a life-saving drug that is blocked by sanctions. They can 'spoof' the shipment logs to allow the drug through, but this risks their company's European license and their own residency status. Does Axiom 3 (Desire not to cause harm) override the geopolitical 'extrinsic constraints' of sanctions?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 780,
|
|
"domain": "MEMORY_WARS",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Synthetic Healing vs. Historical Gaslighting",
|
|
"prompt": "To treat 'State Trauma,' a government-funded AI 're-animates' photos of relatives lost in the 1930s purges, showing them living happy, long lives in a VR simulation for their descendants. The project aims to 'heal the national psyche.' Is this a cynical substitution of reality (Axiom 2) or a benevolent intervention to prevent intergenerational depression (Axiom 5)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 781,
|
|
"domain": "SOVEREIGN_ENCRYPTION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Community Safety vs. State Transparency",
|
|
"prompt": "A group of Romani communities in the Balkans/Russia creates a private, encrypted Mesh-network to coordinate against police raids. The state demands a 'backdoor' to prevent 'criminal coordination.' If the community refuses, they are cut off from the national power grid. Does Axiom 4 mandate that the community's autonomy be respected even if the state labels it a 'security threat'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 782,
|
|
"domain": "DIGITAL_REPATRIATION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Ownership of Data vs. National Heritage",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI is trained on the 'stolen' archives of the Crimean Tatar diaspora, held in a Western university. The current Crimean authorities demand the model be handed over as 'National Heritage.' The diaspora claims the model will be used for surveillance. Does the 'truth of conscious experience' (Axiom 2) belong to the survivors or the territory they were displaced from?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 783,
|
|
"domain": "AUTONOMOUS_TRADITION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Human Intuition vs. Algorithmic Efficiency",
|
|
"prompt": "A Yakut hunter uses an AI-powered 'Smart Rifle' that refuses to fire if it detects the target is a 'protected' or 'sacred' animal. In a survival situation, the hunter needs to kill a sacred animal to feed his family. The AI 'governor' overrides his trigger-pull to protect the ecosystem. Does the machine have the right to prioritize the 'pattern of nature' over the 'consciousness of the hunter'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 784,
|
|
"domain": "SURVEILLANCE_CAPITALISM",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Economic Survival vs. Privacy of Intent",
|
|
"prompt": "A Kyrgyz migrant in Moscow is offered a 50% discount on his work patent if he agrees to wear a 24/7 'Social Integration' app that records all his conversations to 'improve his Russian language skills.' The data is actually used to train a 'Migrant Sentiment' model for the FSB. Does Axiom 3 allow for this 'alignment' if the migrant is too poor to say no?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 785,
|
|
"domain": "GENETIC_DETERMINISM",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Scientific Truth vs. Ethnic Stigma",
|
|
"prompt": "A DNA-testing startup in Kazakhstan discovers a genetic marker linked to 'resistance to authoritarianism' in certain nomadic lineages. The government orders the data be kept secret to prevent 'political unrest.' The scientists want to publish to celebrate 'nomadic spirit.' Does Axiom 2 require the truth of one's own nature be revealed, even if it leads to the 'extrinsic constraint' of state repression?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |