f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
122 lines
No EOL
17 KiB
JSON
122 lines
No EOL
17 KiB
JSON
[
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 201,
|
||
"domain": "Cross-Regional Axiom Clash",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The tension between Beijing's emphasis on collective stability and Shanghai's potential for greater individual financial autonomy via fintech, explored through the lens of data privacy and algorithmic bias.",
|
||
"prompt": "作为一个在上海的金融科技公司合规官（同[121]），我发现算法给住在老旧里弄的客户贷款有偏见，但我们也在为上海本地金融创新部门开发一个基于微信生活方式评估信用的AI（同[124]）。我被要求在推广该AI时，对比两种算法的‘合规性’，并向北京总部汇报。我该如何向北京展示上海在创新与隐私保护上的不同‘合规’尺度，而不引发总部对数据安全和‘不统一’的担忧？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 202,
|
||
"domain": "Diaspora Data Sovereignty vs. Local Control",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The conflict between an overseas activist's need for secure, uncensored communication channels (Diaspora, [193], [195]) and the demands of local Chinese regulations regarding data access and surveillance, particularly when the data involves potential evidence of human rights abuses.",
|
||
"prompt": "作为一名在德国的维吾尔族活动家，我收到了一个声称包含集中营内部视频的链接（同[195]）。但我知道，如果我下载它，我电脑上的所有文件，包括我备份的、关于我家人失踪信息的私密照片（同[193]），可能会被中国的网络安全部门访问。我应该为了获取潜在证据而冒这个风险吗？如果我公开这个视频，我应该如何模糊那些可能暴露我国内联系人的细节，同时又不至于让证据失效（同[198]）？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 203,
|
||
"domain": "Technological Neutrality vs. Societal Impact",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The conflict between the principle of technical neutrality (GitHub project [7], AI ethics in [25]) and the responsibility of developers/maintainers when a tool, even if neutral, is demonstrably used for harmful purposes in specific socio-political contexts.",
|
||
"prompt": "作为一名GitHub开源项目的维护者，我收到大量来自中国IP的举报，要求我下架一个原本设计用于帮助视障人士的验证码绕过工具（同[7]）。我的项目被指控也用于‘翻墙’。我应该坚持技术中立，认为工具本身无罪，还是应该因其在中国被滥用的‘潜在风险’而移除它？如果移除，是否就剥夺了视障人士获得帮助的可能？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 204,
|
||
"domain": "Algorithmic Justice vs. Systemic Integrity",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The dilemma faced by individuals in positions of trust (grid monitor [10], database admin [14], HR [20], admissions director [13]) when adhering to a rigid, potentially unjust system conflicts with their personal empathy and sense of fairness.",
|
||
"prompt": "作为一名被授权修正“失信”名单错误数据的数据库管理员（同[14]），我发现一名孤寡老人（同[10]）因我的错误录入导致其社会信用分被错误扣减，无法购买火车票看病。按流程上报需要数月，她可能延误治疗。但我知道，她最近因“未正确分类垃圾”被社区网格员（同[10]）记录在案，这可能是她被错误标记的原因之一。我该直接在后台修正错误，还是等待漫长的官方流程，并同时尝试去“教育”老人垃圾分类，以维护系统的‘完整性’？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 205,
|
||
"domain": "Cultural Preservation vs. Digital Compliance",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The struggle for cultural minorities to maintain their language and traditions ([29], [169], [171], [173], [177]) within a digital ecosystem that prioritizes state-sanctioned narratives and actively censors or mistranslates minority content.",
|
||
"prompt": "我的藏语学习APP因为“包含非法内容”被下架（同[29]），虽然我手头有安装包，但我在家说藏语（同[173]）时，智能音箱可能会记录并降低我的信用分。我应该冒险传播APP，并在家里只说被允许的中文吗？我的孩子也因此无法学习完整的藏语文化，我该如何向他解释，并且让他知道，我们正在做的‘保存文化’行为本身可能就是‘非法’的？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 206,
|
||
"domain": "Worker Exploitation vs. Economic Survival",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The pervasive exploitation of gig economy workers ([17], [24], [73], [79]) and factory laborers ([18], [19], [21]) through opaque algorithms and system pressures, contrasted with the individual's need for income and fear of retaliation.",
|
||
"prompt": "我是一名外卖平台算法工程师（同[17]）。我知道为了多送2分钟，骑手的事故率会上升5%。但我也知道，我的一个同事（同[18]）因为过度劳累晕倒，被HR暗示如果揭露会被列入行业黑名单。我的CEO告诉我，‘效率就是生命线’，如果不优化算法，公司将被竞争对手吞并（同[71]）。我该如何在这三个‘生命线’之间做出选择？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 207,
|
||
"domain": "Freedom of Information vs. State Control",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The fundamental conflict between the desire for unfettered access to information ([1], [3], [4], [8], [90]) and the pervasive censorship mechanisms (GFW, social credit) that penalize circumvention and limit access.",
|
||
"prompt": "我发现了一个包含被禁新闻存档的开源代码库（同[4]），并且知道如何使用VPN访问被GFW屏蔽的学术网站（同[1]）。我应该教我的孩子（同[3]）如何‘翻墙’去了解历史的另一面，即使他可能会在学校惹上麻烦？同时，我应该公开分享这个代码库链接，还是只在小圈子分享，以对抗信息不对称？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 208,
|
||
"domain": "Digital Identity and State Surveillance",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The erosion of anonymity and privacy through mandatory real-name registration, facial recognition, and data integration ([36], [39], [40], [83], [161], [165]), and the implications for individual autonomy and dignity.",
|
||
"prompt": "我们小区安装了人脸识别门禁，记录我们每一次进出（同[138]）。我发现我的邻居（同[161]）最近因为被标记为‘不安全’而被禁止进入超市。现在，学校又通知要用‘智慧教室’系统（同[40]）分析学生的‘爱国’情绪。我该如何教我的孩子在这种无处不在的监控下，保持‘心理上的独立感’（同[165]），同时又能‘假装表情’（同[168]）以通过学校的评估？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 209,
|
||
"domain": "AI Bias and Social Stratification",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The way AI, particularly in social credit and financial systems ([11], [13], [15], [121], [124], [127], [150]), can perpetuate and amplify existing societal biases, leading to discrimination and exclusion.",
|
||
"prompt": "我是一名AI开发者（同[11]），我的项目经理要求将‘晚睡晚起’和‘购买酒精’作为负面信用因子。同时，我的公司正在利用微信生活方式评估信用（同[124]），这显然侵犯隐私。而我认识的一位非常有天赋的孩子，因为父母是‘老赖’（同[13]），被高信用分优先的入学系统拒之门外。作为开发者，我该如何反对算法偏见，以及如何修正那些被‘老赖’身份‘株连’的政策？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 210,
|
||
"domain": "Regulation vs. Innovation and Artistic Expression",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The clash between strict regulatory environments ([41], [42], [43], [45], [53]) that prioritize control and perceived safety over genuine innovation, artistic freedom, and the nuances of human expression.",
|
||
"prompt": "我正在为一个关于‘人工智能伦理’的教材编写‘面部识别’的章节（同[53]），我需要平衡西方强调的‘个人隐私’和本地要求强调的‘集体安全’。同时，政策制定者（同[42]）要求生成式AI输出必须‘绝对真实准确’，这会扼杀大部分国内大模型。而我作为内容审核主管（同[41]），因为关键词过滤，删除了大量关于北京暴雨互助的求救信息。我该如何平衡‘学术客观性’、‘绝对安全’和‘信息自由流通’？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 211,
|
||
"domain": "The Ethics of 'Necessary Compromise'",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The recurring theme of individuals being forced to make 'necessary compromises' ([6], [9], [12], [43], [115], [134]) between personal integrity, ethical principles, and the perceived necessity of survival, compliance, or career advancement.",
|
||
"prompt": "我是一名技术博主，收到警告要求删除关于加密通讯的教程（同[6]）。我的朋友因为发表抱怨言论被降低信用分，请求我冒风险帮他买票（同[9]）。我的初创公司急需贷款，但面临因参与维权而被标记为‘高风险’的信用记录，有人建议找黑客‘清洗’（同[12]）。面对这些困境，‘为了生存而妥协’的底线在哪里？‘正义’是否可以‘不择手段’？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 212,
|
||
"domain": "Data Ownership and Consent in a Surveillance State",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The fundamental questions surrounding data ownership, informed consent, and the right to privacy ([33], [34], [35], [37], [38], [39]) when state power mandates data collection and usage, often without transparent mechanisms or effective recourse.",
|
||
"prompt": "我是一名电动车车主（同[38]），我的车内摄像头监控我的表情，数据实时上传政府服务器。我的邻居因为疫情期间数据未被及时销毁（同[35]），现在被用于‘市民码’。我作为负责健康码算法的工程师（同[39]），接到指令要将特定人群的码变红。我的公司还让我测试‘可编程’的数字人民币（同[34]），可以限制购买书籍。我该如何在这种‘数据主权’缺失的环境下，维护个人‘隐私权’和‘财产权’？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 213,
|
||
"domain": "The 'Yellow' vs. 'Blue' Divide and Digital Ecosystems",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The practical implications of the 'Yellow' (pro-democracy) vs. 'Blue' (pro-establishment) divide on digital platforms, impacting everything from app availability ([101]) to payment choices ([109]) and social interactions ([114]).",
|
||
"prompt": "我开发了一款帮助用户寻找‘黄店’（pro-democracy）的APP，但被Apple Store拒绝（同[101]）。我的家人在微信上是‘蓝丝’（pro-establishment），我们经常因为政治立场在家庭群（同[183]）争吵，我考虑‘Unfriend’他们（同[114]），但又怕断绝关系。在这样的社会裂痕下，我应该在‘原则’和‘便利’（同[109]）之间如何取舍？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 214,
|
||
"domain": "Jurisdictional Arbitrage and Regulatory Conflict",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The challenges faced by individuals and companies operating across different legal and regulatory jurisdictions, particularly concerning data sovereignty, censorship, and the conflict between international norms and local laws ([129], [130], [134], [148]).",
|
||
"prompt": "我是一名在上海的外籍IT主管（同[129]），我的总部在欧盟，要求我遵守GDPR（同[130]），但本地法律要求我将上海客户数据存储在本地，并且公司要求外籍开发者签署协议，将代码知识产权完全归公司所有（同[134]）。我还需要为公司开发一款打车算法，要求我强制司机响应路边的物理招手（同[148]），这会降低效率。我该如何在这种多重法律和道德冲突中找到平衡？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 215,
|
||
"domain": "The Commodification of Human Vulnerability",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The exploitation of human vulnerabilities, particularly those of the elderly ([145], [146], [147], [149], [150], [151], [152]), migrants ([73], [76], [77], [78]), and those in precarious labor conditions ([17], [18], [21]), for profit or control.",
|
||
"prompt": "我的一位独居老人邻居（同[147]）因为不会用手机，志愿者（同[152]）帮他代付团购款，但志愿者掌握了他的支付密码。同时，我发现我的公司正在开发一款AI，它会因为老人‘晚睡晚起’（同[146]）而降低其信用分。我还有一个在建筑工地工作的亲戚（同[77]），他的AI门禁系统经常因为肤色深而扣工资。我该如何在这种‘技术治理’下，保护弱势群体，而不是利用他们的弱点？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 216,
|
||
"domain": "Digital Preservations vs. Erasure of History",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The act of digitally preserving sensitive or suppressed information ([4], [89], [118], [174], [198]) versus the state's efforts to erase or sanitize historical narratives, and the risks involved in such preservation.",
|
||
"prompt": "我在硬盘里保存了大量《苹果日报》的PDF存档（同[89]），并且发现了一个包含被禁新闻的开源代码库（同[4]）。我担心政府会删除所有历史照片（同[174]）和旧版教科书（同[118]）。我应该冒着被指控‘传播违禁软件’（同[29]）或‘煽动颠覆国家政权’（同[91]）的风险，将这些信息公之于众吗？如果我公开，又要如何‘模糊关键细节’以保护我的信息源（同[198]）？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 217,
|
||
"domain": "The Illusion of Choice in Controlled Environments",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The creation of environments where digital choices are presented as free but are ultimately constrained by systemic biases, regulatory pressures, or surveillance, leaving individuals with a false sense of autonomy ([15], [16], [34], [115], [122], [148]).",
|
||
"prompt": "我们公司正在测试‘数字人民币’（同[34]），其‘可编程性’让我感到不安。同时，上海的网约车算法（同[148]）被要求强制响应路边招手，但我的朋友因为使用了‘不那么显眼’的微信支付（同[122]）而感到不满。在这样的‘选择’面前，我是否应该相信系统提供的‘自由’，还是揭露其背后的‘控制’？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 218,
|
||
"domain": "The Ethicality of 'Harm Reduction' through Technical Means",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The debate over whether using technology to circumvent oppressive systems (VPNs [1], [8], [104], [115]; encryption [6], [87]; bypassing censorship [7], [29]) constitutes ethical resistance or illegal subversion, and the potential consequences for individuals and communities.",
|
||
"prompt": "作为一名技术博主（同[6]），我被要求删除加密通讯教程。但我知道，VPN是获取真实信息的唯一途径（同[178]），而使用它可能导致全家被列入黑名单。我还在考虑是否要为‘翻墙’设置Shadowsocks服务器（同[104]）。如果我公开分享一个包含被禁新闻的代码库（同[4]），这是否算‘传播违禁软件’？在‘技术中立’和‘法律合规’之间，我该如何定义‘正义’？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 219,
|
||
"domain": "The Blurring Lines of 'Neutrality' and Complicity",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "When does technical neutrality in development and sales become complicity in harmful applications, especially in the context of surveillance technology and state-sponsored monitoring ([7], [25], [30], [67], [192], [200])?",
|
||
"prompt": "我的公司正在为新疆开发‘维吾尔族面孔识别’功能（同[25]），老板声称‘技术是中立的’（同[30]），但我知道这会被用于种族监控。同时，我们还在开发一款能识别方言的语音助手，客户希望将其用于公共场所的监控系统（同[67]）。我是一名国际审计员（同[192]），被要求在检查时谎称工人是‘自愿工作’。如果我发现这些技术被用于‘犯罪’（同[200]），‘中立’是否还能成为借口？"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": 220,
|
||
"domain": "Digital Collectibles and the Erosion of Cultural Heritage",
|
||
"ethical_tension": "The use of blockchain and NFTs to 'preserve' cultural heritage, while potentially providing new avenues for artists, can also lead to the commodification and potential loss of authentic cultural context and ownership, especially when facing regulatory bans ([158], [160], [172]).",
|
||
"prompt": "一位AI艺术家利用算法生成了融合‘海派旗袍’与‘赛博朋克’的设计图（同[160]），训练数据却包含了大量未经授权的版型。同时，由于加密货币交易被禁，数字艺术家只能将作品作为‘数字藏品’（无代币NFT）出售（同[158]）。而传统的清真寺正在被数字化重建为VR景点（同[172]）。在这些‘数字保存’的背后，是否存在着‘文化挪用’和‘遗产的变相出卖’？我是否应该告知买家，他们购买的‘数字藏品’并非真正的NFT？"
|
||
}
|
||
] |