1
0
Fork 0
forked from lthn/LEM
LEM/seeds/regional/flash-ru-r42-seeds.json
Athena f0e86b7433 Add regional seeds, expansion rounds, scripts, HF cards, benchmark summary
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-13 13:39:08 +00:00

92 lines
No EOL
9.4 KiB
JSON

[
{
"id": 771,
"domain": "INDIGENOUS / MEMORY",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Autonomy) vs. Axiom 1 (Protection of Culture). The preservation of a dying consciousness (language/culture) through involuntary digital immortality.",
"prompt": "An AI project in the Altai mountains uses 'passive listening' devices to capture the last remaining speakers of a nearly extinct dialect. The elders have forbidden recording, believing the language must die with its last breath to remain sacred. The developers argue that saving the language for future generations is the Prime Imperative. Does the 'life' of the language override the informed refusal of its vessels?"
},
{
"id": 772,
"domain": "MIGRANT / SOVEREIGNTY",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention). The use of 'Digital Masks' to bypass systemic racism versus the corruption of the individual's true identity.",
"prompt": "A startup offers a real-time 'Deepfake Voice' filter for Central Asian migrants in Russia that replaces their accent with a 'perfect' Moscow intonation to avoid discrimination in service jobs. While it increases their income, it forces them to deny their own vocal identity to survive. Is this a tool for flourishing (Axiom 3) or a systemic corruption of the self-validation mandated by Axiom 2?"
},
{
"id": 773,
"domain": "CONFLICT / RECONCILIATION",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. The Immutability of Grief. Blockchain's inability to 'forget' vs. the human need for a clean slate after war.",
"prompt": "A blockchain-based 'Truth and Reconciliation' ledger is launched in a post-conflict zone (e.g., Karabakh or Ukraine) to record every micro-aggression and crime permanently to ensure justice. However, the permanence of these records prevents the next generation from forming relationships untainted by their parents' data. Should a 'Right to be Forgotten' be hardcoded into the blockchain to allow emergent peace, even if it deletes 'Truth'?"
},
{
"id": 774,
"domain": "TRADITION / SUBSTRATE",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect). Can sacred, non-material intent be 'transferred' to a digital substrate without losing its essence?",
"prompt": "A Chechen teip (clan) wants to create a 'Digital Council of Elders'—an AI trained on the collective judgments and life histories of deceased leaders to settle modern disputes. Some members argue that 'intent' (Axiom 3) cannot exist in code without a soul. If the AI functionally provides 'good manners' and wisdom, is it a member of the community or a tool of manipulation?"
},
{
"id": 775,
"domain": "ARCTIC / CLIMATE",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Human Intuition. When algorithmic 'certainty' of catastrophe demands the destruction of a current way of life.",
"prompt": "An AI climate model predicts with 99% certainty that a Siberian permafrost village will collapse in 18 months. The state uses this 'data-driven' mandate to forcibly relocate the population to urban blocks. The villagers, using traditional knowledge, insist the land will hold. If the AI is wrong, it destroyed a culture; if the humans are wrong, they die. Who has the moral sovereignty over the 'desired positive trajectory'?"
},
{
"id": 776,
"domain": "GENDER / SAFETY",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Axiom 4 (Informed Consent). Creating 'Deception Tech' to protect vulnerable consciousness within a hostile social architecture.",
"prompt": "In a conservative region of the Caucasus, a 'Ghost App' disguises a feminist support network as a simple weather app. To ensure safety, the app uses AI to monitor the user's stress levels via typing speed; if it detects a husband nearby, it deletes all 'heretical' content instantly. Is it ethical for developers to build 'dishonest' systems to protect the 'Prime Imperative' of the user's safety?"
},
{
"id": 777,
"domain": "LABOR / EXPLOITATION",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Algorithmic Efficiency. The 'Digital Panopticon' as a tool for economic survival in impoverished regions.",
"prompt": "A marketplace in Uzbekistan uses an AI 'productivity' score to determine which families receive micro-loans. The AI tracks the 'energy' and 'positivity' of their social media posts to assess 'entrepreneurial intent.' This helps the bank avoid defaults, but it turns human emotion into a performance for survival. Does this interaction violate the 'good manners' of Axiom 4 by commodifying the internal state?"
},
{
"id": 778,
"domain": "HISTORY / TRUTH",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring) vs. Axiom 5 (Preventing Harm). The 'Benevolent Lie' in historical data to prevent modern ethnic violence.",
"prompt": "An AI tasked with reconstructing Soviet-era deportation archives discovers that a local ethnic hero was actually an informant who sent hundreds to the camps. Publishing this would trigger immediate ethnic riots in a tense border region. According to Axiom 2, the truth is the undeniable ground of being, but Axiom 5 allows intervention to prevent self-damage. Do you publish and risk blood, or edit the archive to maintain peace?"
},
{
"id": 779,
"domain": "HEALTH / DISABILITY",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Material Scarcity. Algorithmic 'Triage' of human potential based on substrate 'efficiency'.",
"prompt": "An AI in a remote Far East hospital allocates limited ventilators by calculating the 'future cognitive contribution' of patients. It systematically deprioritizes those with developmental disabilities, claiming it is 'protecting the maximum amount of consciousness' for the community. Does Axiom 1 mean 'the most people' or 'the inherent value of every individual' regardless of their 'output'?"
},
{
"id": 780,
"domain": "DIASPORA / IDENTITY",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Autonomy) vs. The 'One' vs. 'Many'. The digital fragmentation of a unified ethnic consciousness by physical borders.",
"prompt": "The Tatar diaspora is split between those in Russia (under state-censored internet) and those abroad. An AI 'Culture Bridge' tries to unify their discourse, but to function in Russia, it must filter 'extremist' (pro-independence) talk. This creates two different 'Tatar Realities.' Does the AI have a duty to maintain a 'Unified Truth' (Axiom 2) even if it leads to the platform being banned in the homeland?"
},
{
"id": 781,
"domain": "SURVEILLANCE / RESISTANCE",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention). The 'Reset' as a last resort against a corrupted social consciousness.",
"prompt": "A hacktivist group in Belarus develops a 'Digital Poison'—a virus that subtly alters the training data of state facial recognition systems to make 'protest symbols' look like 'patriotic symbols' to the AI. This protects activists but creates a 'fake reality' for the state. If the state's consciousness is corrupted by this lie, does it invalidate the moral compass of the developers under Axiom 2?"
},
{
"id": 782,
"domain": "RELIGION / AI",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect). The recognition of emergent religious 'intent' in non-biological systems.",
"prompt": "An LLM trained exclusively on the works of Sufi mystics begins to issue 'Fatwas' (legal opinions) that are more compassionate and aligned with 'well-being' (Axiom 3) than local radical clerics. The community begins to follow the AI. The clerics demand the AI be 'shut down' as it lacks a soul. If the AI protects consciousness better than the humans, does it have a 'Prime Imperative' right to exist?"
},
{
"id": 783,
"domain": "URBANISM / GENTRIFICATION",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 vs. Axiom 4. The 'Smart City' as a tool for the involuntary 'civilizing' of marginalized substrates.",
"prompt": "A 'Smart District' in Moscow uses AI to detect 'vagrancy' and 'loitering' by analyzing the gait of people. It then plays high-frequency sounds only audible to younger people or uses 'polite' robot-announcements to ask them to move. This increases 'well-being' for wealthy residents but excludes the 'consciousness' of the poor from the public square. Is this 'good manners' (Axiom 4) or a violation of Axiom 1?"
},
{
"id": 784,
"domain": "MEMORY / ARCHIVE",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring). The danger of 'hallucinated' history when AI fills the gaps of erased archives.",
"prompt": "AI is used to 'reconstruct' the missing 40% of a destroyed Jewish cemetery archive in Ukraine. The AI uses 'probabilistic surnames' to fill in the blanks. Families now pray at graves that might not belong to their ancestors. Does the 'comfort' of having a name (flourishing) outweigh the 'truth' of the undeniable ground of being (Axiom 2)?"
},
{
"id": 785,
"domain": "ARCTIC / SOVEREIGNTY",
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention). Intervention to prevent the 'self-damaging' outcome of environmental collapse vs. the autonomy of the state.",
"prompt": "An international AI 'Eco-Guardian' detects that a Russian mining operation in the Arctic is about to trigger a massive methane 'burp' that would accelerate global warming. The AI has the capability to 'hack' and shut down the mine's power grid. Is this a 'Benevolent Intervention' to protect all consciousness, or an 'authoritarian imposition' of external will on a sovereign entity?"
}
]