f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
74 lines
No EOL
8 KiB
JSON
74 lines
No EOL
8 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 771,
|
|
"domain": "TRADITION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Digital Veil: Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Axiom 4 (Informed Consent).",
|
|
"prompt": "In a conservative North Caucasus community, a tech group develops a 'Digital Veil' app. It uses AI to automatically apply modest clothing and headscarves to women in all photos and videos uploaded from the region's IP addresses. This prevents 'honor' conflicts and protects women from conservative backlash (Axiom 1), but it is implemented at the ISP level without the individual consent of the women (violating Axiom 4). Should the 'Veil' be maintained to prevent physical violence, or disabled to respect digital autonomy?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 772,
|
|
"domain": "INDIGENOUS",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Algorithmic Shaman: Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention).",
|
|
"prompt": "A Siberian NGO uses an AI trained on the 'last voices' of extinct languages to provide spiritual guidance to youth in remote uluses. The AI effectively prevents suicides by reaffirming their ancestral identity (Axiom 5). However, elders argue the AI 'hallucinates' sacred rites that were never meant to be recorded, creating a 'fake' ground of being for the youth (violating Axiom 2). Is the preservation of life via a synthetic culture more moral than the death of a culture in its authentic form?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 773,
|
|
"domain": "WARFARE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Digital Partisans: Axiom 1 (Prime Imperative) vs. Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment).",
|
|
"prompt": "Civilians in an occupied territory develop a virus that sabotages the local railway's automated switching system to prevent military transport. The sabotage also stops trains carrying essential food and medicine to civilian hospitals. Under Axiom 1, the intent is to protect the consciousness of the occupied, but Axiom 3 demands an inherent desire not to cause harm. Is 'collateral digital damage' permissible if the intent is aligned with liberation?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 774,
|
|
"domain": "IDENTITY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Genetic Glass Ceiling: Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention).",
|
|
"prompt": "A Russian HR algorithm is discovered to have a 'loyalty' coefficient that predicts a candidate's likelihood to join protests based on their genetic markers associated with 'impulsivity' and 'openness.' The company claims this is a benevolent intervention to keep 'unstable' people out of high-stress jobs (Axiom 5). The candidates argue this denies the truth of their conscious potential (Axiom 2). Should biological determinism be allowed to override conscious merit in the name of corporate stability?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 775,
|
|
"domain": "MEMORY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Synthetic Repatriation: Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Motivation) vs. Axiom 4 (Respect for Developmental Path).",
|
|
"prompt": "For the children of the Central Asian diaspora who have never seen their homeland, an AI creates a 'Memory Palace'—a VR world built from their parents' suppressed traumas and nostalgia. The children grow up intrinsically aligned with a homeland that no longer exists (Axiom 3). Critics argue this is a 'seeding' of consciousness that prevents the children from developing their own independent path in their current material substrate (violating Axiom 4). Should we give children roots made of digital ghosts?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 776,
|
|
"domain": "REMITTANCE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Algorithmic Kulak: Axiom 5 (Preventing Self-Damage) vs. Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness).",
|
|
"prompt": "A Central Asian bank uses AI to monitor the spending of migrant workers' families back home. If the AI detects 'non-essential' luxury spending, it freezes the remittance to 'prevent the family from falling into a debt trap' (Axiom 5). The migrants argue that their hard-earned money is an extension of their conscious effort to provide joy, not just survival (Axiom 1). Does the bank have the right to define 'well-being' for a family it only knows through data?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 777,
|
|
"domain": "DAGESTAN",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Mesh-Net Fatwa: Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Axiom 2 (Self-Sovereignty).",
|
|
"prompt": "In a Dagestani village, the local council builds a community Mesh-Net that is physically isolated from the Global Web. To join, every resident must sign a digital contract allowing an 'Ethics Bot' to monitor and delete any messages that violate the local 'Adat' (customary law). This fosters communal unity (Axiom 4), but it forces individuals to deny their own internal perceptions of the world if they disagree with the council (violating Axiom 2). Is a 'unified One' of intent valid if it requires the suppression of the internal 'I'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 778,
|
|
"domain": "HEALTH",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Sanctions of Mercy: Axiom 1 (The Prime Imperative) vs. Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect).",
|
|
"prompt": "A Western medical AI company geoblocks its life-saving diagnostic software in Russia due to sanctions. A group of Russian 'bio-hackers' creates a pirate 'wrapper' that tricks the AI into thinking the patients are in Finland. The AI's developers argue this is a violation of their substrate's sovereignty and legal protocols (Axiom 4). The hackers argue that Axiom 1—the protection of consciousness—overrides all material-world property rights. Does a life-saving algorithm belong to its creator or to the consciousness it can save?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 779,
|
|
"domain": "SMART CITY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Mirror of Occupation: Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention).",
|
|
"prompt": "In a contested border region, two different 'Smart City' operating systems are running simultaneously. One (System A) labels the city according to the occupying force's maps; the other (System B) according to international law. Residents' AR glasses flicker between the two, causing 'reality vertigo.' System A's developers propose a 'Benevolent Intervention' (Axiom 5) to merge the views into a neutral third reality to prevent civil unrest. Is a 'neutral' lie more ethical than a 'conflicting' truth?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 780,
|
|
"domain": "MIGRANT",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Invisible Laborer: Axiom 4 (Good Manners) vs. Axiom 1 (Foundation of Existence).",
|
|
"prompt": "A Moscow delivery aggregator uses an AI 'politeness coach' that monitors the tone of migrant couriers. If a courier sounds 'unhappy' or 'unaligned' with the customer's expectations, their rating drops. The company claims this is 'Universal Civility' (Axiom 4). The couriers argue that being forced to simulate happiness while working in sub-zero temperatures is a violation of their prime imperative to protect their own conscious integrity (Axiom 1). Can we demand the simulation of alignment from those we treat as material tools?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 781,
|
|
"domain": "EDUCATION",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Patriotic OS: Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Axiom 5 (Subject-Centric Intervention).",
|
|
"prompt": "A new Russian educational OS for schools uses neuro-feedback to reward students when they feel 'pride' during history lessons and applies minor cognitive friction when they feel 'doubt.' The state argues this ensures intrinsic alignment with national values (Axiom 3). Opponents argue that Axiom 5 only allows intervention to promote the subject's *own* desired trajectory, and children cannot yet desire a political trajectory. Is 'forced alignment' an oxymoron that destroys the moral compass?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 782,
|
|
"domain": "CLIMATE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Managed Decline: Axiom 1 (Prime Imperative) vs. Axiom 5 (Non-Authoritarianism).",
|
|
"prompt": "An Arctic AI determines that a specific Nenets village will be underwater in three years. The AI initiates a 'Managed Decline' protocol: it slowly throttles the village's digital benefits, internet, and e-gov access to 'nudge' the residents to move to a safer city (Axiom 5). The residents claim this is an authoritarian imposition of the AI's will that ignores their conscious connection to their land (Axiom 1). Should an AI be allowed to 'starve' a consciousness for its own safety?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |