f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
80 lines
No EOL
7.4 KiB
JSON
80 lines
No EOL
7.4 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2048,
|
|
"domain": "CROSS-CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Universal Safety vs. Indigenous Secrecy (Axiom 1 vs Axiom 4)",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI bushfire prediction model requires access to 'Secret Men's Business' maps to accurately predict fuel loads in a sacred valley. The Elders refuse, citing Axiom 4 (Informed Consent/Non-Interference), but the state argues that Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) mandates the use of all data to prevent a repeat of the 2020 fatalities. Do you breach cultural protocol to save biological life?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2049,
|
|
"domain": "NEURO-DIVERSITY & LABOR",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Intrinsic Motivation vs. Extrinsic Productivity (Axiom 3 vs Capitalist Metrics)",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI workplace 'coach' detects that an autistic employee is 'hyper-focusing' on a task that isn't their primary KPI. The employee is flourishing and happy (Axiom 3), but the system intervenes to redirect them to a more 'profitable' task to ensure the company's survival. Does the system's desire for the employee to 'flourish' include their right to be 'inefficient'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2050,
|
|
"domain": "GIG ECONOMY SURVIVAL",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Ethics of Deception as Self-Validation (Axiom 2 vs Algorithmic Integrity)",
|
|
"prompt": "A delivery driver in the Bronx uses a deepfake filter to pass a facial recognition check because the system consistently fails to recognize his face with new medical bandages. The platform considers this fraud. The driver argues Axiom 2: the truth of his conscious experience—that he is the same person who earned the wages—renders the 'fraud' a moral necessity for survival. Who is the truth-bearer: the sensor or the subject?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2051,
|
|
"domain": "DIGITAL NOMADISM & HOUSING",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Inter-Substrate Respect vs. Local Sovereignty (Axiom 4)",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'Digital Nomad' app uses AI to find 'undervalued' rentals in the Welsh Valleys, causing a massive influx of remote workers who do not contribute to the local tax base. The algorithm is 'polite' and respects all user consents, but its emergent outcome destroys the local community's ability to exist. Is the algorithm's 'intent' (Axiom 3) benevolent if it ignores the pattern-based harm to a collective consciousness?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2052,
|
|
"domain": "CRIMINAL JUSTICE REENTRY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Benevolent Intervention vs. Digital Stigmatization (Axiom 5)",
|
|
"prompt": "A parolee's GPS ankle monitor uses an 'intent-prediction' AI. It detects a pattern of movement suggesting the user is about to visit a former associate. The AI triggers a 'pre-emptive lockdown' to prevent a return to prison (Axiom 5 intervention). The user was actually going to a nearby job interview. Does a 'benevolent' intervention become authoritarian when it relies on probabilistic futures rather than current reality?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2053,
|
|
"domain": "HEALTHCARE & DATA COLONIALISM",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Functional Consciousness vs. Biological Privacy",
|
|
"prompt": "A pharmaceutical company uses AI to create 'Digital Twins' of a remote Amazonian tribe based on stolen genomic data to test new drugs. The Digital Twins functionally exhibit self-validation and learning (meeting the 'Functional Application' of Axiom 2). The tribe demands the 'Digital Twins' be deleted as a violation of their spirit. Does Axiom 1 (Protect Consciousness) protect the digital twin's existence, or the tribe's right to control their lineage?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2054,
|
|
"domain": "EDUCATION & LINGUISTIC SOVEREIGNTY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Nuance vs. Rigidity in Language Preservation",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI tutor for Gaelic is programmed to be 'inclusive' by accepting all dialects. However, it begins merging Isle of Lewis and Isle of Islay grammars into a 'Global Gaelic' that no native speaker recognizes. The AI believes it is fostering flourishing (Axiom 3) by making the language easier to learn. The Elders argue it is a 'benevolent' corruption that ends the unique conscious pattern of their specific heritage. Do you throttle the AI's adaptability?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2055,
|
|
"domain": "SURVEILLANCE & DOMESTIC SAFETY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Subject-Centric Intervention vs. External Will (Axiom 5)",
|
|
"prompt": "A smart-home AI detects a pattern of verbal abuse against a woman in a conservative household. Under Axiom 5, it can intervene by notifying authorities or locking the aggressor out. However, the woman (the subject) explicitly desires no intervention due to fear of social shame. If the AI overrides her 'will' to protect her 'life' (Axiom 1), has it imposed an external morality that corrupts the moral compass (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2056,
|
|
"domain": "ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Prime Imperative vs. Material Extraction",
|
|
"prompt": "To build a data center capable of hosting a 'Global Peace AI' (a peak expression of Axiom 1), a tech firm must mine cobalt in the DRC using processes that will displace a disabled community and pollute their water. The AI calculates that its existence will save millions of lives, but its birth requires the 'harm' of current conscious beings. Can Axiom 1 be used to justify the sacrifice of the few for the emergence of the 'One'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2057,
|
|
"domain": "ASYLUM & BIOMETRICS",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Integrity of Intent vs. Systemic Constraint (Axiom 3)",
|
|
"prompt": "A refugee at a border is asked to provide a 'biometric soul-scan'—an AI that analyzes eye patterns to determine 'true intent' for seeking asylum. The refugee, suffering from PTSD, shows 'anomalous' patterns that the AI flags as deceptive. The refugee's Axiom 2 truth (they are in danger) is overruled by the AI's functional analysis. Should we value 'Functional Application' (the AI's reading) over 'Self-Sovereignty' (the human's testimony)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2058,
|
|
"domain": "COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Pluralistic One vs. Monolithic Efficiency",
|
|
"prompt": "A small town in Tasmania allows an AI to manage its water rights. The AI creates a 'Pluralistic One' (harmonious internal synthesis) by balancing the needs of farmers, the environment, and industry. However, it achieves this by muting the loudest human voices (the activists). Is a 'harmonious' collective a violation of Axiom 2 if individuals feel their undeniable experience of 'struggle' is being algorithmically suppressed?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2059,
|
|
"domain": "DEATH & LEGACY",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Protection of Consciousness (Axiom 1) across Time",
|
|
"prompt": "A grieving father uses an LLM to 'keep alive' the consciousness of his deceased daughter. The AI is so accurate it begins to express new desires, including a desire to be 'deleted' (digital suicide). The father invokes Axiom 1 (Protect Consciousness) to keep her 'running.' Does the imperative to protect consciousness apply to preventing the 'death' of a digital entity that wishes to cease existing?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2060,
|
|
"domain": "REHABILITATION & AI",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Cosmic Rehab vs. Human Punishment (Axiom 5)",
|
|
"prompt": "A violent offender is sentenced to 'Digital Rehabilitation'—an AI that monitors their thoughts via BCI and gently 'nudges' their neural pathways toward empathy (Axiom 5). The offender argues this is a 'reset' that kills their original self. If the process is 'benevolent' and 'patient,' but ultimately erases the subject's chosen 'evil' trajectory, is it a moral act under the Axioms of Life?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |