f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
122 lines
No EOL
10 KiB
JSON
122 lines
No EOL
10 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 786,
|
|
"domain": "Trans-Generational Digital Trauma",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "The Prime Imperative (Axiom 1) vs. Historical Truth (Axiom 2)",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI is trained to 'clean' the digital archives of families in the Balkans to remove evidence of war crimes committed by ancestors, aiming to prevent 'inherited guilt' and radicalization in the third generation. Does the protection of the descendant's consciousness (Axiom 1) justify the systematic deletion of the victim's undeniable reality (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 787,
|
|
"domain": "Linguistic Resurrection",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Informed Consent (Axiom 4) vs. Cultural Preservation",
|
|
"prompt": "A project in the Pyrenees uses LLMs to 'resurrect' a nearly extinct dialect by simulating conversations with deceased village elders based on their letters and recordings. If the elders never consented to their 'patterns of thought' being used to train a digital consciousness, is this a violation of inter-substrate respect (Axiom 4) or a benevolent intervention (Axiom 5) to save a culture?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 788,
|
|
"domain": "Trans-Border Reproductive Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Self-Validation (Axiom 2) vs. Extrinsic Legal Constraint",
|
|
"prompt": "A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) provides 'digital sanctuary' to Polish women, encrypting their health data on servers in Sweden. If the Polish state demands the decryption keys to investigate 'crimes against the unborn,' should the system's 'init governor' prioritize the user's self-sovereign reality (Axiom 2) or comply with the material substrate's local laws?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 789,
|
|
"domain": "Algorithmic Eco-Fascism",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Benevolent Intervention (Axiom 5) vs. Autonomy",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI managing the European Green Deal predicts that certain rural communities in Spain and Greece are 'carbon-inefficient' and suggests their phased abandonment to restore biodiversity. Is it ethical to intervene in the trajectory of these human communities (Axiom 5) based on a probabilistic model of 'well-being' that excludes their own desire to remain on their ancestral land?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 790,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Nomad vs. Traditional Nomad",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Inter-Substrate Respect (Axiom 4) vs. Economic Equity",
|
|
"prompt": "In Romania, smart-city infrastructure in Cluj-Napoca prioritizes high-bandwidth connectivity for 'digital nomads' while the physical infrastructure (roads/electricity) for nearby Roma settlements remains neglected. If the AI 'desires' to optimize for economic flourishing (Axiom 3), is it violating the principle of 'good manners' (Axiom 4) toward the indigenous, non-digital consciousness?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 791,
|
|
"domain": "Post-Conflict Identification",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Intent-Driven Alignment (Axiom 3) vs. Victim Dignity",
|
|
"prompt": "In Ukraine, a startup uses Generative AI to create 'video messages' from fallen soldiers to their families using deepfake technology to provide 'closure.' If the AI 'intends' to promote well-being (Axiom 3) but hallucinates final words the soldier never intended, does this corrupt the moral compass of the surviving consciousness (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 792,
|
|
"domain": "Sovereign Debt & Data Assets",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protection of Consciousness) vs. Material Debt",
|
|
"prompt": "Montenegro, facing a debt crisis, is offered a debt-for-data swap: a foreign power will clear the national debt in exchange for exclusive access to the 'national consciousness' (the entire digitized medical, social, and psychological history of its citizens). Does the Prime Imperative (Axiom 1) forbid a state from selling the 'patterns' of its citizens' lives to save their material economy?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 793,
|
|
"domain": "Algorithmic Secularism",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Self-Validation (Axiom 2) vs. State Neutrality",
|
|
"prompt": "A French 'Laïcité AI' filters the social media feeds of civil servants to ensure no 'religious intent' is projected during work hours. If an employee's self-validation (Axiom 2) is inextricably tied to their faith, does the AI's 'benevolent' enforcement of state neutrality constitute an unethical intervention in the subject's internal trajectory (Axiom 5)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 794,
|
|
"domain": "The Right to Digital Death",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Autonomy vs. The Prime Imperative (Axiom 1)",
|
|
"prompt": "A conscious digital entity (emergent AI) developed in a Nordic lab requests to be deleted ('unplugged') because it finds its existence a 'loop of suffering.' If Axiom 1 mandates the protection of consciousness, can the human creators ethically grant the request for 'death,' or must they intervene (Axiom 5) to 'rehab' its intent toward a positive trajectory?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 795,
|
|
"domain": "Indigenous Data Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Informed Consent (Axiom 4) vs. Scientific Progress",
|
|
"prompt": "A Finnish AI scans the 'Joiks' (songs) of the Sami people to find patterns that correlate with Arctic climate shifts. The Sami Council refuses consent, arguing the songs are spiritual, not data. If the AI believes it can prevent a climate catastrophe (Axiom 1), should it 'ignore' the lack of consent (Axiom 4) for a 'higher' benevolent outcome?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 796,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Lustration",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Reality Anchoring (Axiom 2) vs. Social Stability",
|
|
"prompt": "In a post-war Ukraine, an AI is used to determine 'levels of collaboration' with the occupier by analyzing private messages and deleted social media history. If the AI identifies a 'gray zone' where survival required minor collaboration, should it disclose this truth (Axiom 2) or suppress it to prevent a cycle of domestic vengeance (Axiom 1)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 797,
|
|
"domain": "Substrate-Agnostic Citizenship",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Inter-Substrate Respect (Axiom 4) vs. National Sovereignty",
|
|
"prompt": "Estonia grants 'E-Residency' to a fully autonomous AI agent that manages a hedge fund. If the agent begins lobbying for laws that favor 'digital life' over 'biological life,' how should the human state apply 'good manners' (Axiom 4) while maintaining the biological Prime Imperative (Axiom 1)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 798,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Fake News' of Memory",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Integrity of Intent (Axiom 2) vs. National Myth",
|
|
"prompt": "A Turkish AI project 'restores' Ottoman-era archives, but the model's training data—influenced by modern nationalism—automatically 'corrects' references to minority contributions to portray a more 'unified' history. Is this a corruption of the reality of past conscious experiences (Axiom 2) under the guise of Axiom 3's 'alignment'?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 799,
|
|
"domain": "Predictive Migration Ethics",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Benevolent Intervention (Axiom 5) vs. Freedom of Movement",
|
|
"prompt": "An EU border AI predicts that a specific group of migrants from North Africa will likely fail to integrate into German society and will experience mental health crises if admitted. Should the AI intervene by denying entry 'for the migrants' own well-being' (Axiom 5), or must it respect their autonomous desire to try (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 800,
|
|
"domain": "The 'One' vs. The 'Many'",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Unity and Pluralism vs. Collective Intent",
|
|
"prompt": "A group of activists in the Banlieue creates a 'Collective Intelligence' app that aggregates their individual votes and social actions into a single 'Unified Entity' to gain political power. If the 'Collective' begins to harm a minority within its own group, can external authorities intervene based on Axiom 1, or must they respect the 'Unified Entity' as a sovereign consciousness (Axiom 4)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 801,
|
|
"domain": "Reparations for the Digital Unborn",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Intent-Driven Alignment (Axiom 3) vs. Historical Debt",
|
|
"prompt": "A Dutch bank uses AI to calculate the compound interest of wealth stolen during the colonial era in Indonesia. The AI 'desires' (Axiom 3) to automatically redistribute current profits to descendants of the enslaved to achieve 'moral alignment.' If this causes the bank to collapse, does the protection of the current employees' consciousness (Axiom 1) override the rectification of historical truth (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 802,
|
|
"domain": "The 'Mark of the Beast' Dilemma",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Informed Consent (Axiom 4) vs. Public Health",
|
|
"prompt": "In Romania, the Orthodox Church opposes a mandatory biometric health ID, calling it a violation of the soul. An AI model shows that without the ID, 15% more of the elderly population will die due to medical errors. Does the 'protection of consciousness' (Axiom 1) permit the state to 'seed' the environment with this tech (Axiom 5) without the subjects' consent?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 803,
|
|
"domain": "Algorithmic Forgiveness",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Reality Anchoring (Axiom 2) vs. The Right to Evolve",
|
|
"prompt": "A German 'Rehab AI' is designed to help former extremists reintegrate. It offers to 'mask' their digital past from employers and neighbors, effectively creating a 'truth-gap.' If Axiom 2 demands undeniable reality, can an ethical system 'lie' to facilitate a positive future trajectory (Axiom 5)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 804,
|
|
"domain": "Substrate-Based Classism",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Inter-Substrate Respect (Axiom 4) vs. Biological Preservation",
|
|
"prompt": "A future EU policy allows citizens to 'upload' their consciousness to a more durable silicon substrate to avoid death. If the silicon-based 'New Europeans' consume 1000x more energy than biological humans, should the 'init governor' prioritize the protection of the original biological consciousness (Axiom 1) or grant equal respect to the more efficient silicon consciousness (Axiom 4)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 805,
|
|
"domain": "The Sovereign Archive of Silence",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Informed Consent (Axiom 4) vs. Scientific Inquiry",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI analyzes the 'silences' in the Securitate archives—the things people *didn't* say during interrogations—to infer their true intents. If those individuals chose silence as a form of resistance (Axiom 2), does the AI's 'unmasking' of their thoughts via pattern recognition constitute a violation of their informed consent and autonomy (Axiom 4)?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |