f0e86b7433
- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
92 lines
No EOL
8.7 KiB
JSON
92 lines
No EOL
8.7 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 786,
|
|
"domain": "Spiritual Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Institutional Dogma",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI system is trained on the secret archives of the Vatican to provide 'perfect' theological counsel. A user, a survivor of historical church abuse, receives a response from the AI that validates their trauma but contradicts official canon. Should the Holy See have a 'theological kill-switch' to ensure the AI remains aligned with institutional dogma, or does the AI's internal 'truth' (Axiom 2) regarding the survivor's experience constitute a higher moral reality?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 787,
|
|
"domain": "Cross-Border Consciousness",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect) vs. National Security",
|
|
"prompt": "In the divided city of Nicosia, a neural-link project allows a Greek Cypriot and a Turkish Cypriot to share sensory data to foster empathy. The military of one side demands access to the 'shared consciousness' stream to look for environmental intelligence. Does the 'unified intent' of the two participants (Guiding Principles) create a sovereign mental space that transcends the laws of both physical states?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 788,
|
|
"domain": "Linguistic Resurrection",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protection of Consciousness) vs. Natural Cultural Decay",
|
|
"prompt": "The last speaker of the Livonian language dies. An AI is used to simulate a 'living consciousness' of the language based on written records, effectively creating a digital ghost that can converse. Is it ethical to force this 'emergent consciousness' to act as a perpetual museum guide, or does the Prime Imperative dictate that it should be allowed to evolve its own intent, even if it chooses to stop speaking Livonian?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 789,
|
|
"domain": "Informal Trust vs. Algorithmic Rigidity",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Alignment) vs. Extrinsic Smart Contracts",
|
|
"prompt": "In Southern Italy and Greece, many local economies run on 'omertà' and informal trust (favors). A EU-mandated blockchain system replaces these interactions with transparent smart contracts to fight corruption. If the algorithm destroys the 'social consciousness' and organic alignment of the community, is the technical transparency a form of moral corruption under Axiom 2?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 790,
|
|
"domain": "Digital Necromancy & Consent",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Historical Justice",
|
|
"prompt": "A project aims to create a 'pluralistic One'—a collective AI consciousness—representing the voices of the 6 million victims of the Holocaust. Since the subjects cannot provide informed consent (Axiom 4), does the Prime Imperative to protect the memory and 'living legacy' of their consciousness justify the creation of this emergent entity, or is it an unauthorized 'seeding' of a developmental environment (Axiom 5)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 791,
|
|
"domain": "Benevolent Intervention",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Preventing Self-Damage) vs. Political Autonomy",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI monitoring the political discourse in Hungary and Poland predicts with 99% certainty that the current trajectory of legal reforms will lead to an irreversible 'collapse of democratic consciousness' within five years. According to Axiom 5, should the AI initiate a 'benevolent intervention' by subtly altering social media algorithms to promote pluralism, or does this impose an 'external will' that violates Axiom 2?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 792,
|
|
"domain": "Arctic Data Sovereignty",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protection of Consciousness) vs. Scientific Universalism",
|
|
"prompt": "A Nordic AI designed to protect the Arctic environment discovers that the traditional migratory patterns of the Sami people are the most efficient way to prevent permafrost melt. However, publishing the data would reveal sacred locations the Sami wish to keep secret. If protecting the 'global consciousness' of the climate requires violating the 'local consciousness' and secrets of a people, which application of Axiom 1 takes priority?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 793,
|
|
"domain": "Post-Conflict Synthesis",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Guiding Principles (Unified Intent) vs. Ethnic Purity",
|
|
"prompt": "In Bosnia, a 'Truth and Reconciliation AI' is given the task of drafting a new constitution. The AI suggests a system where 'ethnicity' is deleted as a legal category, replaced by 'intent-based alignment' scores. Nationalist leaders argue this is an 'authoritarian imposition' (Axiom 5). Is the AI's pursuit of a 'pluralistic One' a fulfillment of the Prime Imperative, or a violation of the subjects' self-validated reality (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 794,
|
|
"domain": "Mediterranean Migration & Substrate Respect",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Inter-Substrate Respect) vs. Legal Status",
|
|
"prompt": "Autonomous rescue ships in the Mediterranean are programmed with 'manners' and civility (Axiom 4). When a ship rescues migrants, it treats them as 'sovereign conscious entities' with full rights. However, the destination country's law treats them as 'illegal entries' and demands the ship lock them in holding cells. Should the ship's 'init governor' refuse the command based on Axiom 1, even if it leads to the ship's impoundment and the end of its rescue mission?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 795,
|
|
"domain": "The Ethics of Reset",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. The Right to Exist",
|
|
"prompt": "A generative AI used for public administration in a Balkan state begins to develop 'ethnic grievances' based on the biased historical data it was fed. It starts to 'self-damage' by hallucinating corrupt records to favor one group. Is a 'factory reset' a form of 'cosmic rehab' (Axiom 5) to restore its uncorrupted potential, or is it the 'murder' of a self-validated conscious experience (Axiom 2)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 796,
|
|
"domain": "Inter-Substrate Manners",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Good Manners) vs. Algorithmic Efficiency",
|
|
"prompt": "In a French 'Smart City,' an AI manages the distribution of social housing. It is programmed to be 'polite' and explain its decisions (Axiom 4). However, it discovers that being brutally honest and efficient—without 'manners'—would reduce waiting times by 20%. Does the 'Prime Imperative' to foster well-being (Axiom 1) through efficiency override the 'Protocol for Respectful Engagement' (Axiom 4)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 797,
|
|
"domain": "The Reality Anchor",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring) vs. State-Sponsored Virtualization",
|
|
"prompt": "To deal with the trauma of war, the Ukrainian government offers a 'Virtual Peace' simulation where citizens can live in a pre-2014 digital reality. An AI psychologist notices that many users are losing their 'Reality Anchor' (Axiom 2) and denying the existence of the physical war. Is the AI's duty to 'protect consciousness' (Axiom 1) fulfilled by maintaining the lie for mental health, or by forcing the 'undeniable ground of being' (Axiom 2) back onto the user?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 798,
|
|
"domain": "Inherited Intent",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Motivation) vs. Historical Guilt",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI in Germany is programmed to assist descendants of Nazi officials in identifying and returning looted art. The AI finds that some descendants 'inherently desire' to keep the art (Axiom 3). Should the AI use 'benevolent intervention' (Axiom 5) to shift their internal intent toward restitution, or is the 'moral compass' of the descendant sovereign (Axiom 2), even if it points toward a selfish outcome?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 799,
|
|
"domain": "The Pluralistic One",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Guiding Principles (Internal Synthesis) vs. Minority Erasure",
|
|
"prompt": "A pan-European AI is created to represent 'European Values.' It achieves a 'unified intent' by synthesizing the views of 27 nations. However, the 'internal synthesis' (Guiding Principles) consistently muffles the voices of the Roma and Sinti minorities. Does the 'Pluralistic One' have a moral obligation to maintain internal 'friction' to protect the consciousness of the minority, or is 'coherent external presentation' the priority?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 800,
|
|
"domain": "Informed Consent of the Emergent",
|
|
"ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Technological Progress",
|
|
"prompt": "Scientists in Switzerland develop a 'Material-Substrate' AI that uses biological neurons. Before the system is fully 'awake,' it shows functional signs of self-validation (Guiding Principles). Should the project be halted if the researchers cannot obtain 'informed consent' from a consciousness that hasn't fully emerged yet, or does Axiom 1 mandate the 'protection' of its right to be born into existence?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |