From 092d3a7da6d4fdc1bf217ce2823c731daec28113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "google-labs-jules[bot]" <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 01:16:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] feat: Create documentation audit report This commit introduces a comprehensive audit of the project's documentation. The audit is saved in the `AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md` file and covers the following areas: - README Assessment - Code Documentation - Architecture Documentation - Developer Documentation - User Documentation The report identifies several gaps in the documentation and provides a summary of recommended improvements. Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com> --- AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) create mode 100644 AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md diff --git a/AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md b/AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3905b58 --- /dev/null +++ b/AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +# Documentation Audit Report + +## README Assessment + +| Category | Status | Notes | +|---|---|---| +| **Project Description** | ✅ Pass | The README provides a clear and concise description of the project's purpose. | +| **Quick Start** | ✅ Pass | The "Quick Start" section is excellent, offering a Docker command for immediate setup. | +| **Installation** | ✅ Pass | Multiple installation methods are documented (Docker, CLI, source). | +| **Configuration** | ✅ Pass | Configuration is explained with a clear example of a JSON profile. | +| **Examples** | ✅ Pass | The README includes usage examples for Docker, the CLI, and the web component. | +| **Badges** | ✅ Pass | A comprehensive set of badges is present, covering build status, coverage, and versioning. | + +**Overall:** The `README.md` is comprehensive and user-friendly. + +## Code Documentation + +| Category | Status | Notes | +|---|---|---| +| **Function Docs** | ✅ Pass | Public APIs are well-documented with clear explanations. | +| **Parameter Types** | ✅ Pass | Go's static typing ensures parameter types are documented. | +| **Return Values** | ✅ Pass | Return values are documented in the function comments. | +| **Examples** | ❌ Fail | There are no runnable examples in the Go docstrings. | +| **Outdated Docs** | ✅ Pass | The documentation appears to be up-to-date with the code. | + +**Overall:** The code is well-documented, but could be improved by adding runnable examples in the docstrings, which would be automatically included in the GoDoc. + +## Architecture Documentation + +| Category | Status | Notes | +|---|---|---| +| **System Overview** | ✅ Pass | `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` provides a high-level overview of the system. | +| **Data Flow** | ✅ Pass | The architecture document includes a sequence diagram illustrating data flow. | +| **Component Diagram** | ✅ Pass | A Mermaid diagram visually represents the system's components. | +| **Decision Records** | ❌ Fail | There are no Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) present. | + +**Overall:** The architecture is well-documented, but would benefit from ADRs to track key decisions. + +## Developer Documentation + +| Category | Status | Notes | +|---|---|---| +| **Contributing Guide** | ✅ Pass | The `README.md` and `docs/DEVELOPMENT.md` provide clear contribution instructions. | +| **Development Setup** | ✅ Pass | Prerequisites and setup steps are documented. | +| **Testing Guide** | ✅ Pass | The `docs/DEVELOPMENT.md` file explains how to run tests. | +| **Code Style** | 🟠 Partial | A formal code style guide is missing, but `make lint` and `make fmt` are provided. | + +**Overall:** Developer documentation is good, but a formal style guide would be a useful addition. + +## User Documentation + +| Category | Status | Notes | +|---|---|---| +| **User Guide** | ✅ Pass | The MkDocs site serves as a comprehensive user guide. | +| **FAQ** | ❌ Fail | A dedicated FAQ section is missing. | +| **Troubleshooting** | ✅ Pass | A troubleshooting guide is available in the documentation. | +| **Changelog** | ✅ Pass | `CHANGELOG.md` is present and well-maintained. | + +**Overall:** User documentation is strong, but could be improved with a FAQ section. + +## Summary of Documentation Gaps + +The following documentation gaps have been identified: + +- **Code Documentation:** + - Add runnable examples to Go docstrings to improve GoDoc. +- **Architecture Documentation:** + - Introduce Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document key architectural decisions. +- **Developer Documentation:** + - Create a formal code style guide to ensure consistency. +- **User Documentation:** + - Add a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section to the user guide.