Merge branch 'feat/documentation-audit-1347151787667773887' into copilot/combine-39-prs-into-one

AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# Documentation Audit Report
+
+## README Assessment
+
+| Category | Status | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Project Description** | ✅ Pass | The README provides a clear and concise description of the project's purpose. |
+| **Quick Start** | ✅ Pass | The "Quick Start" section is excellent, offering a Docker command for immediate setup. |
+| **Installation** | ✅ Pass | Multiple installation methods are documented (Docker, CLI, source). |
+| **Configuration** | ✅ Pass | Configuration is explained with a clear example of a JSON profile. |
+| **Examples** | ✅ Pass | The README includes usage examples for Docker, the CLI, and the web component. |
+| **Badges** | ✅ Pass | A comprehensive set of badges is present, covering build status, coverage, and versioning. |
+
+**Overall:** The `README.md` is comprehensive and user-friendly.
+
+## Code Documentation
+
+| Category | Status | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Function Docs** | ✅ Pass | Public APIs are well-documented with clear explanations. |
+| **Parameter Types** | ✅ Pass | Go's static typing ensures parameter types are documented. |
+| **Return Values** | ✅ Pass | Return values are documented in the function comments. |
+| **Examples** | ❌ Fail | There are no runnable examples in the Go docstrings. |
+| **Outdated Docs** | ✅ Pass | The documentation appears to be up-to-date with the code. |
+
+**Overall:** The code is well-documented, but could be improved by adding runnable examples in the docstrings, which would be automatically included in the GoDoc.
+
+## Architecture Documentation
+
+| Category | Status | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| **System Overview** | ✅ Pass | `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` provides a high-level overview of the system. |
+| **Data Flow** | ✅ Pass | The architecture document includes a sequence diagram illustrating data flow. |
+| **Component Diagram** | ✅ Pass | A Mermaid diagram visually represents the system's components. |
+| **Decision Records** | ❌ Fail | There are no Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) present. |
+
+**Overall:** The architecture is well-documented, but would benefit from ADRs to track key decisions.
+
+## Developer Documentation
+
+| Category | Status | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Contributing Guide** | ✅ Pass | The `README.md` and `docs/DEVELOPMENT.md` provide clear contribution instructions. |
+| **Development Setup** | ✅ Pass | Prerequisites and setup steps are documented. |
+| **Testing Guide** | ✅ Pass | The `docs/DEVELOPMENT.md` file explains how to run tests. |
+| **Code Style** | 🟠 Partial | A formal code style guide is missing, but `make lint` and `make fmt` are provided. |
+
+**Overall:** Developer documentation is good, but a formal style guide would be a useful addition.
+
+## User Documentation
+
+| Category | Status | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| **User Guide** | ✅ Pass | The MkDocs site serves as a comprehensive user guide. |
+| **FAQ** | ❌ Fail | A dedicated FAQ section is missing. |
+| **Troubleshooting** | ✅ Pass | A troubleshooting guide is available in the documentation. |
+| **Changelog** | ✅ Pass | `CHANGELOG.md` is present and well-maintained. |
+
+**Overall:** User documentation is strong, but could be improved with a FAQ section.
+
+## Summary of Documentation Gaps
+
+The following documentation gaps have been identified:
+
+- **Code Documentation:**
+  - Add runnable examples to Go docstrings to improve GoDoc.
+- **Architecture Documentation:**
+  - Introduce Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document key architectural decisions.
+- **Developer Documentation:**
+  - Create a formal code style guide to ensure consistency.
+- **User Documentation:**
+  - Add a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section to the user guide.