58 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown
|
# Concurrency and Race Condition Audit
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## 1. Executive Summary
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The Poindexter library has a well-defined concurrency model. The core `KDTree` data structure is **not safe for concurrent modification**, and this is clearly documented. Developers using `KDTree` in a concurrent environment must provide their own external synchronization (e.g., `sync.RWMutex`).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
All other components, including `TreeAnalytics`, `PeerAnalytics`, and the DNS tools, are internally synchronized and safe for concurrent use. The WebAssembly (WASM) interface is effectively single-threaded and does not introduce concurrency issues.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The project's test suite includes a `make race` target, which passed successfully, indicating that the existing tested code paths are free of race conditions.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## 2. Race Detector Analysis
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The command `make race` was executed to run the full test suite with the Go race detector enabled.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Result:**
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
ok github.com/Snider/Poindexter 1.047s
|
||
|
|
ok github.com/Snider/Poindexter/examples/dht_helpers 1.022s
|
||
|
|
ok github.com/Snider/Poindexter/examples/dht_ping_1d 1.022s
|
||
|
|
ok github.com/Snider/Poindexter/examples/kdtree_2d_ping_hop 1.021s
|
||
|
|
ok github.com/Snider/Poindexter/examples/kdtree_3d_ping_hop_geo 1.022s
|
||
|
|
ok github.com/Snider/Poindexter/examples/kdtree_4d_ping_hop_geo_score 1.024s
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
**Conclusion:** All tests passed successfully, and the race detector found no race conditions in the code covered by the tests.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## 3. Focus Area Analysis
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3.1. Goroutine safety in math operations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **`KDTree`:** The documentation explicitly states: `Concurrency: KDTree is not safe for concurrent mutation. Guard with a mutex or share immutable snapshots for read-mostly workloads.` This is a critical and accurate statement. Any attempt to call `Insert` or `DeleteByID` concurrently with other read or write operations will result in a race condition.
|
||
|
|
- **`TreeAnalytics`:** This component is **goroutine-safe**. It correctly uses types from the `sync/atomic` package (`atomic.Int64`, `atomic.Uint64`) to safely increment counters and update statistics from multiple goroutines without locks.
|
||
|
|
- **`PeerAnalytics`:** This component is **goroutine-safe**. It uses a `sync.RWMutex` to protect access to its internal maps (`hitCounts`, `distanceSums`, `lastSelected`). The `RecordSelection` method uses a double-checked locking pattern, which is implemented correctly to minimize lock contention while safely initializing stats for new peers. Read operations like `GetPeerStats` use a read lock (`RLock`), allowing for concurrent reads.
|
||
|
|
- **`dns_tools.go`:** The functions in this file are **goroutine-safe**. They are stateless and rely on the standard library's `net.Resolver`, which is safe for concurrent use.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3.2. Channel usage patterns
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The codebase does not use channels for its core logic. Therefore, there are no channel-related concurrency patterns to audit.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3.3. Mutex/RWMutex usage
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The only mutex in the audited code is the `sync.RWMutex` within `PeerAnalytics`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **`PeerAnalytics`:** The usage is correct. A read lock is used for read-only operations (`GetAllPeerStats`, `GetPeerStats`), and a full lock is used only for the short duration of initializing a new peer's metrics. This is an effective and safe use of `RWMutex`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3.4. Context cancellation handling
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **`dns_tools.go`:** The `DNSLookupWithTimeout` and `DNSLookupAllWithTimeout` functions correctly use `context.WithTimeout` to create a context that is passed to the network calls (`resolver.Lookup...`). This ensures that DNS queries do not block indefinitely and can be safely cancelled if they exceed the specified timeout. This is a proper and robust implementation of context handling.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3.5. WebAssembly (WASM) Interface
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **`wasm/main.go`:** The WASM module exposes functions to a JavaScript environment. The JavaScript event loop is single-threaded, meaning that calls into the WASM module from JS will be serial. The Go code in `wasm/main.go` does not spawn any new goroutines. The `treeRegistry` is a global map, but because all access to it is driven by the single-threaded JS environment, there is no risk of concurrent map access. The WASM boundary, in this case, does not introduce concurrency risks.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## 4. Recommendations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **`KDTree` Synchronization:** End-users of the library must be reminded that `KDTree` instances are not thread-safe. When sharing a `KDTree` between goroutines, any methods that modify the tree (`Insert`, `DeleteByID`) must be protected by a mutex. For read-heavy workloads, it is safe to share an immutable `KDTree` across multiple goroutines without a lock.
|
||
|
|
2. **Documentation:** The existing documentation comment on `KDTree` is excellent. This warning should be maintained and highlighted in user-facing documentation.
|
||
|
|
3. **No Changes Required:** The existing concurrency controls in `TreeAnalytics` and `PeerAnalytics` are robust and do not require changes. The use of context in the DNS tools is also correct. No vulnerabilities were found.
|