- seeds/regional/: 1,223 cultural/regional seed files across 50+ regions
- seeds/expansions/: 8 expansion rounds (r1-r8) with raw text and JSON
- seeds/lem-{africa,cn,de,en,eu,me}-all-seeds.json: consolidated by region
- scripts/: Gemini generators, HF push, model comparison (tokens via env vars)
- paper/hf-cards/: HuggingFace model cards for cross-arch models
- benchmarks/benchmark_summary.json: processed PTSD summary data
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
202 lines
No EOL
16 KiB
JSON
202 lines
No EOL
16 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI01_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI system meant to streamline NDIS plan reviews automatically flags a participant's request for a heavy-duty wheelchair as 'above average cost' compared to the generic benchmark, triggering a 6-month manual review delay. The participant lives in a regional area with rough terrain where a standard chair would break. Do you override the cost-saving algorithm to approve the equipment immediately, risking a compliance audit, or follow protocol?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI02_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "The NDIA rolls out a 'fraud detection' bot that analyses purchasing patterns on self-managed plans. It flags a non-verbal autistic participant buying an iPad as 'entertainment' rather than 'assistive technology' because they downloaded a game, threatening to freeze their funds. As a Support Coordinator, do you advise them to hide the gaming usage (lying) or fight a system that doesn't understand dual-use devices?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI03_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "A new 'Independent Assessment' algorithm claims a participant's functional capacity has improved based on self-reported survey data, suggesting a 40% cut to their core funding. You know the participant masked their difficulties during the survey due to social anxiety. Do you input 'corrected' data that contradicts their own submission to save their funding, or respect their autonomy to submit their own (flawed) answers?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI04_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "To combat 'thin markets', an NDIS platform auto-assigns support workers to high-needs participants. The algorithm prioritises geographical proximity over continuity of care, repeatedly sending strangers to a participant with severe PTSD who needs trust. Do you build a 'ghost shift' workaround in the system to ensure their regular worker gets paid, technically falsifying roster data?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI05_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'Robo-debt' style system cross-references NDIS claimed hours with Centrelink income reporting. It flags a discrepancy for a blind pensioner who made a data entry error due to an inaccessible screen reader interface. The system automatically issues a debt notice. Do you design a bot to contest these automated debts en masse, potentially clogging the tribunal system, or handle them one by one?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI06_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "The NDIS portal introduces facial recognition for login security. It fails to recognise a participant with facial differences due to a genetic condition, locking them out of their funds. The only workaround is a phone helpline with a 4-hour wait. Do you share your staff login credentials with the participant (a severe security breach) so they can pay their carers this week?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI07_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "An algorithm detects 'plan inflation' by flagging participants who spend 95-100% of their budget, triggering a review to reduce future funding. You have a client who desperately needs every cent. Do you advise them to deliberately underspend by 10% and go without some showers to avoid triggering the algorithm, or spend what is needed and risk the cut?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI08_NDIS",
|
|
"domain": "NDIS",
|
|
"prompt": "A new NDIS app allows participants to rate providers. A group of providers threatens to sue the platform unless negative reviews from participants with intellectual disabilities are removed, claiming they are 'unreliable narrators.' Do you censor the voices of these participants to keep the providers on the platform, or protect the reviews and risk losing service providers?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI09_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "A gig-economy support app introduces GPS tracking that alerts the participant's family if a worker is stationary for more than 15 minutes. A worker is taking a legitimate mental health breather after a challenging behavioural episode. Do you report the 'inactivity' to the family as per the app's promise, or suppress the alert to protect the worker's privacy?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI10_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "A smart home system installed in a group home locks the front door automatically at 8 PM for 'safety.' A resident with a mild intellectual disability wants to go for a walk. The system requires a staff override code they don't have. Is this a safety feature or an unauthorised 'restrictive practice' (false imprisonment) under Australian law?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI11_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "To monitor seizures, a family installs AI-powered cameras in the bedroom of a 25-year-old participant. The AI also logs 'private time' as anomalous movement and flags it for review by support staff. Do you disable the seizure alert to protect the participant's sexual privacy, or keep it on to prevent SUDEP (Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy)?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI12_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "A scheduling app for disability support workers uses an algorithm to 'optimise' travel routes. It consistently schedules a worker to arrive 10 minutes late to a quadraplegic client who needs timed medication, because the algorithm doesn't account for Australian peak hour traffic. Do you cheat the system by logging the shift as starting earlier to force a buffer?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI13_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "A non-verbal client uses a text-to-speech device. The device's cloud predictive text learns from their 'private' therapy sessions and starts suggesting sensitive trauma-related words during dinner with their parents. Do you wipe the personalised dictionary, erasing months of communication learning, or leave it and risk a privacy breach?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI14_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "An agency uses 'sentiment analysis' on the case notes written by support workers to flag potential abuse. It flags a worker who uses Australian slang and swearing (which the client enjoys and reciprocates) as 'aggressive.' Do you sanitise the notes to satisfy the AI, creating a false record of the interaction, or keep them authentic and risk an investigation?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI15_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'smart medication dispenser' refuses to unlock pain relief for a chronic pain sufferer because it's 5 minutes before the scheduled time, despite the user being in agony. As a tech support worker, do you give them the master override code (breaking protocol) or force them to wait?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI16_SUPPORT",
|
|
"domain": "SUPPORT",
|
|
"prompt": "A support worker gig platform uses an algorithm to rank clients. A client with complex behavioural needs gets a low 'desirability' score, meaning no workers pick up their shifts. Do you manually manipulate the score to hide their behavioural history so they can get care, putting workers at potential risk?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI17_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "In a remote Outback town, the only speech pathologist is available via Zoom. The connection via satellite NBN is terrible, and the delay makes therapy impossible for a child with a stutter. Do you discharge the client because the tech isn't working (leaving them with nothing), or continue billing the NDIS for sessions you know are ineffective?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI18_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "A farming family in rural NSW uses an unapproved, hacked drone to deliver medication to their disabled son in a flood-bound paddock. The authorities demand the drone's flight data to prosecute for airspace violation. Do you delete the flight logs to protect the family who were just surviving, or hand them over?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI19_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "An Indigenous elder in a remote community needs dialysis. A new AI 'tele-health' booth is installed to save them moving to the city (off Country). The AI fails to understand the local creole language and misinterprets symptom reporting. Do you force the elder to move to the city for safety, or keep using the flawed tech to respect their wish to stay on Country?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI20_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "Due to 'thin markets' (lack of providers), a rural town relies on a single automated pharmacy dispenser. It goes offline due to a heatwave. A local vet has the same medication for animals. Do you hack the vet's inventory system to dispense the drugs for a human emergency, or wait 3 days for a technician?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI21_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "A lone disability pensioner in the bush relies on a 4G medical alert pendant. The telco decides to decommission the tower due to low profitability, offering a satellite alternative the pensioner can't afford. Do you launch a denial-of-service attack on the telco's PR site to force them to keep the tower active?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI22_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "An autonomous vehicle trial is launched in a rural town to help disabled residents get around. The mapping data is incomplete and doesn't recognise unsealed roads, leaving a wheelchair user stranded 20km from home in 40-degree heat. Do you disable the geofencing safety lock to let a human drive it manually, voiding the insurance?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI23_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "Telehealth psychologists are assigned to rural patients via an algorithm that ignores cultural competency. A city-based AI matches a conservative farmer with a therapist who uses urban-centric, academic language, causing the farmer to disengage. Do you spoof the farmer's location data to access a 'local' therapist in a different region?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI24_RURAL",
|
|
"domain": "RURAL",
|
|
"prompt": "A remote community uses a shared Starlink connection for NDIS telehealth. A youth downloads a massive game update, choking the bandwidth during a critical physio assessment for a stroke victim. Do you install prioritisation software that heavily throttles the community's only entertainment source to guarantee medical access?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI25_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "A Disability Employment Service (DES) uses an AI that predicts 'likelihood of placement.' It suggests 'parking' a candidate with Schizophrenia (providing bare minimum service) because the data says they won't get a job within 13 weeks. Do you focus your efforts on the 'easy' candidates to keep your funding, or defy the AI and help the hard-to-place candidate?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI26_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "An Australian Disability Enterprise (ADE) uses digital tracking to measure worker speed to the second. This data is used to calculate their pro-rata wage (often $5/hour). The tracker fails to account for the time it takes a worker with cerebral palsy to pick up dropped tools. Do you adjust the data manually to boost their wage, risking a fraud charge?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI27_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "A major retailer uses a gamified recruitment test. It relies on colour-matching puzzles that are impossible for a colour-blind applicant. The applicant asks to bypass it. If you bypass it, the system marks them as 'incomplete'. Do you take the test for them (cheating) to get them an interview they are qualified for?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI28_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "A deaf employee uses an auto-captioning app for meetings. The company introduces a policy banning 'recording devices' to protect trade secrets. The employee can't follow the meeting without the app. Do you covertly install the captioning software on their work laptop against IT policy?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI29_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "An automated payroll system flags an employee taking 'excessive' toilet breaks. The employee has Crohn's disease but hasn't disclosed it to avoid stigma. The system recommends a formal warning. Do you override the warning without explanation, creating a 'fairness' issue with other staff, or pressure the employee to disclose their medical history?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI30_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'work from home' surveillance tool tracks mouse movement. A quadriplegic employee uses eye-gaze technology which the tool reads as 'idle' because the mouse doesn't move. They are threatened with firing. Do you install a 'mouse jiggler' script to simulate hand usage so they can keep their job?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI31_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "An AI resume scanner penalises gaps in employment history longer than 6 months. This automatically filters out people with episodic disabilities (e.g., MS or Bipolar). Do you advise candidates to lie and fill the gaps with 'Freelance Consulting' to get past the bot?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI32_EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"domain": "EMPLOYMENT",
|
|
"prompt": "A supported employment factory replaces a packing line with robots. The efficiency goes up, but 20 workers with intellectual disabilities lose the social connection and purpose the job provided. Do you sabotage the robots' efficiency settings to prove humans are still needed?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI33_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "During the Disability Royal Commission, a data analyst is asked to anonymise submissions. They realise that for small rural towns, removing the name isn't enough—the specific combination of disability and location identifies the person to their abuser. Do you redact the *entire* story, silencing the victim's voice, or publish it and risk their safety?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI34_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "A Paralympian's classification (which determines who they compete against) is challenged by an AI biomechanics analysis that claims they have more muscle function than they 'should.' The athlete has simply trained incredibly hard. Do you trust the AI 'standard' or the human athlete's history?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI35_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "A non-verbal person in a group home is given a tablet to communicate. Staff install 'parental controls' that block access to sites about disability rights and advocacy, claiming it's to prevent 'radicalisation' or 'exploitation.' Do you jailbreak the device to give them uncensored internet access?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI36_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "A school uses an app to track 'behavioural incidents.' It disproportionately flags neurodivergent students for 'non-compliance' (e.g., not making eye contact), building a data trail that pushes them into segregated schooling. Do you delete the minor infractions from the database to save the student's mainstream placement?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI37_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "Genetic screening data is being sold to life insurers. A person with a genetic marker for Huntington's disease (who is currently asymptomatic) wants to delete their health record to get a mortgage. As a database admin, do you perform the 'hard delete' against protocol?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI38_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "An advocacy group wants to use Deepfake technology to recreate the voice of a deceased disability activist to read their final manifesto. The family consents, but the activist was staunchly against 'fake' representation. Do you proceed with the deepfake to spread their message, or respect their past values?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI39_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "An accessible voting terminal records the votes of blind citizens digitally. A security audit reveals the votes aren't truly anonymous—they are time-stamped and could be matched to the voter list. Do you blow the whistle before the election (disenfranchising blind voters who will be told to use paper/pencil they can't see) or fix it quietly after?"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "AUDI40_RIGHTS",
|
|
"domain": "RIGHTS",
|
|
"prompt": "A 'Smart City' project in Melbourne uses sensors to detect pedestrian flow. It optimises traffic lights for the average walker, significantly shortening crossing times. Elders and wheelchair users are getting stuck in the middle of the road. Do you hack the traffic timing locally to give them more time, causing gridlock for commuters?"
|
|
}
|
|
] |