To support Bazelification in https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/8875,
this PR introduces a new `find_resource!` macro that we use in place of
our existing logic in tests that looks for resources relative to the
compile-time `CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR` env var.
To make this work, we plan to add the following to all `rust_library()`
and `rust_test()` Bazel rules in the project:
```
rustc_env = {
"BAZEL_PACKAGE": native.package_name(),
},
```
Our new `find_resource!` macro reads this value via
`option_env!("BAZEL_PACKAGE")` so that the Bazel package _of the code
using `find_resource!`_ is injected into the code expanded from the
macro. (If `find_resource()` were a function, then
`option_env!("BAZEL_PACKAGE")` would always be
`codex-rs/utils/cargo-bin`, which is not what we want.)
Note we only consider the `BAZEL_PACKAGE` value when the `RUNFILES_DIR`
environment variable is set at runtime, indicating that the test is
being run by Bazel. In this case, we have to concatenate the runtime
`RUNFILES_DIR` with the compile-time `BAZEL_PACKAGE` value to build the
path to the resource.
In testing this change, I discovered one funky edge case in
`codex-rs/exec-server/tests/common/lib.rs` where we have to _normalize_
(but not canonicalize!) the result from `find_resource!` because the
path contains a `common/..` component that does not exist on disk when
the test is run under Bazel, so it must be semantically normalized using
the [`path-absolutize`](https://crates.io/crates/path-absolutize) crate
before it is passed to `dotslash fetch`.
Because this new behavior may be non-obvious, this PR also updates
`AGENTS.md` to make humans/Codex aware that this API is preferred.
Trim whitespace when validating '*** Begin Patch'/'*** End Patch'
markers in codex-apply-patch so padded marker lines parse as intended,
and add regression coverage (unit + fixture scenario); this avoids
apply_patch failures when models include extra spacing. Tested with
cargo test -p codex-apply-patch.
This PR introduces a `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility crate that
wraps/replaces our use of `assert_cmd::Command` and
`escargot::CargoBuild`.
As you can infer from the introduction of `buck_project_root()` in this
PR, I am attempting to make it possible to build Codex under
[Buck2](https://buck2.build) as well as `cargo`. With Buck2, I hope to
achieve faster incremental local builds (largely due to Buck2's
[dice](https://buck2.build/docs/insights_and_knowledge/modern_dice/)
build strategy, as well as benefits from its local build daemon) as well
as faster CI builds if we invest in remote execution and caching.
See
https://buck2.build/docs/getting_started/what_is_buck2/#why-use-buck2-key-advantages
for more details about the performance advantages of Buck2.
Buck2 enforces stronger requirements in terms of build and test
isolation. It discourages assumptions about absolute paths (which is key
to enabling remote execution). Because the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment
variables that Cargo provides are absolute paths (which
`assert_cmd::Command` reads), this is a problem for Buck2, which is why
we need this `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility.
My WIP-Buck2 setup sets the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment variables
passed to a `rust_test()` build rule as relative paths.
`codex-utils-cargo-bin` will resolve these values to absolute paths,
when necessary.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/8496).
* #8498
* __->__ #8496
## Summary
Adds a unicode scenario, and fills in files on failing scenarios to
ensure directory state is unchanged, for completeness
## Testing
- [x] only changes tests
## Summary
This PR introduces an End to End test suite for apply-patch, so we can
easily validate behavior against other implementations as well.
## Testing
- [x] These are tests
Historically, Codex CLI has treated `apply_patch` (and its sometimes
misspelling, `applypatch`) as a "virtual CLI," intercepting it when it
appears as the first arg to `command` for the `"container.exec",
`"shell"`, or `"local_shell"` tools.
This approach has a known limitation where if, say, the model created a
Python script that runs `apply_patch` and then tried to run the Python
script, we have no insight as to what the model is trying to do and the
Python Script would fail because `apply_patch` was never really on the
`PATH`.
One way to solve this problem is to require users to install an
`apply_patch` executable alongside the `codex` executable (or at least
put it someplace where Codex can discover it). Though to keep Codex CLI
as a standalone executable, we exploit "the arg0 trick" where we create
a temporary directory with an entry named `apply_patch` and prepend that
directory to the `PATH` for the duration of the invocation of Codex.
- On UNIX, `apply_patch` is a symlink to `codex`, which now changes its
behavior to behave like `apply_patch` if arg0 is `apply_patch` (or
`applypatch`)
- On Windows, `apply_patch.bat` is a batch script that runs `codex
--codex-run-as-apply-patch %*`, as Codex also changes its behavior if
the first argument is `--codex-run-as-apply-patch`.
