Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Bolin
14116ade8d
feat: include available decisions in command approval requests (#12758)
Command-approval clients currently infer which choices to show from
side-channel fields like `networkApprovalContext`,
`proposedExecpolicyAmendment`, and `additionalPermissions`. That makes
the request shape harder to evolve, and it forces each client to
replicate the server's heuristics instead of receiving the exact
decision list for the prompt.

This PR introduces a mapping between `CommandExecutionApprovalDecision`
and `codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision`:

```rust
impl From<CoreReviewDecision> for CommandExecutionApprovalDecision {
    fn from(value: CoreReviewDecision) -> Self {
        match value {
            CoreReviewDecision::Approved => Self::Accept,
            CoreReviewDecision::ApprovedExecpolicyAmendment {
                proposed_execpolicy_amendment,
            } => Self::AcceptWithExecpolicyAmendment {
                execpolicy_amendment: proposed_execpolicy_amendment.into(),
            },
            CoreReviewDecision::ApprovedForSession => Self::AcceptForSession,
            CoreReviewDecision::NetworkPolicyAmendment {
                network_policy_amendment,
            } => Self::ApplyNetworkPolicyAmendment {
                network_policy_amendment: network_policy_amendment.into(),
            },
            CoreReviewDecision::Abort => Self::Cancel,
            CoreReviewDecision::Denied => Self::Decline,
        }
    }
}
```

And updates `CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams` to have a new field:

```rust
available_decisions: Option<Vec<CommandExecutionApprovalDecision>>
```

when, if specified, should make it easier for clients to display an
appropriate list of options in the UI.

This makes it possible for `CoreShellActionProvider::prompt()` in
`unix_escalation.rs` to specify the `Vec<ReviewDecision>` directly,
adding support for `ApprovedForSession` when approving a skill script,
which was previously missing in the TUI.

Note this results in a significant change to `exec_options()` in
`approval_overlay.rs`, as the displayed options are now derived from
`available_decisions: &[ReviewDecision]`.

## What Changed

- Add `available_decisions` to
[`ExecApprovalRequestEvent`](de00e932dd/codex-rs/protocol/src/approvals.rs (L111-L175)),
including helpers to derive the legacy default choices when older
senders omit the field.
- Map `codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision` to app-server
`CommandExecutionApprovalDecision` and expose the ordered list as
experimental `availableDecisions` in
[`CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams`](de00e932dd/codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/v2.rs (L3798-L3807)).
- Thread optional `available_decisions` through the core approval path
so Unix shell escalation can explicitly request `ApprovedForSession` for
session-scoped approvals instead of relying on client heuristics.
[`unix_escalation.rs`](de00e932dd/codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs (L194-L214))
- Update the TUI approval overlay to build its buttons from the ordered
decision list, while preserving the legacy fallback when
`available_decisions` is missing.
- Update the app-server README, test client output, and generated schema
artifacts to document and surface the new field.

## Testing

- Add `approval_overlay.rs` coverage for explicit decision lists,
including the generic `ApprovedForSession` path and network approval
options.
- Update `chatwidget/tests.rs` and app-server protocol tests to populate
the new optional field and keep older event shapes working.

## Developers Docs

- If we document `item/commandExecution/requestApproval` on
[developers.openai.com/codex](https://developers.openai.com/codex), add
experimental `availableDecisions` as the preferred source of approval
choices and note that older servers may omit it.
2026-02-26 01:10:46 +00:00
viyatb-oai
c086b36b58
feat(ui): add network approval persistence plumbing (#12358)
## Summary
- add TUI approval options for persistent network host rules
- add app-server v2 approval payload plumbing for network approval
context + proposed network policy amendments
- add app-server handling to translate `applyNetworkPolicyAmendment`
decisions back into core review decisions
- update docs/test client output and generated app-server schemas/types
2026-02-25 07:06:19 +00:00
Celia Chen
1151972fb2
feat: add experimental additionalPermissions to v2 command execution approval requests (#12737)
This adds additionalPermissions to the app-server v2
item/commandExecution/requestApproval payload as an experimental field.

The field is now exposed on CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams and is
populated from the existing core approval event when a command requests
additional sandbox permissions.

This PR also contains changes to make server requests to support
experiment API.

A real app server test client test:

sample payload with experimental flag off:
```
 {
<   "id": 0,
<   "method": "item/commandExecution/requestApproval",
<   "params": {
<     "command": "/bin/zsh -lc 'mkdir -p ~/some/test && touch ~/some/test/file'",
<     "commandActions": [
<       {
<         "command": "mkdir -p '~/some/test'",
<         "type": "unknown"
<       },
<       {
<         "command": "touch '~/some/test/file'",
<         "type": "unknown"
<       }
<     ],
<     "cwd": "/Users/celia/code/codex/codex-rs",
<     "itemId": "call_QLp0LWkQ1XkU6VW9T2vUZFWB",
<     "proposedExecpolicyAmendment": [
<       "mkdir",
<       "-p",
<       "~/some/test"
<     ],
<     "reason": "Do you want to allow creating ~/some/test/file outside the workspace?",
<     "threadId": "019c9309-e209-7d82-a01b-dcf9556a354d",
<     "turnId": "019c9309-e27a-7f33-834f-6011e795c2d6"
<   }
< }
```
with experimental flag on: 
```
< {
<   "id": 0,
<   "method": "item/commandExecution/requestApproval",
<   "params": {
<     "additionalPermissions": {
<       "fileSystem": null,
<       "macos": null,
<       "network": true
<     },
<     "command": "/bin/zsh -lc 'install -D /dev/null ~/some/test/file'",
<     "commandActions": [
<       {
<         "command": "install -D /dev/null '~/some/test/file'",
<         "type": "unknown"
<       }
<     ],
<     "cwd": "/Users/celia/code/codex/codex-rs",
<     "itemId": "call_K3U4b3dRbj3eMCqslmncbGsq",
<     "proposedExecpolicyAmendment": [
<       "install",
<       "-D"
<     ],
<     "reason": "Do you want to allow creating the file at ~/some/test/file outside the workspace sandbox?",
<     "threadId": "019c9303-3a8e-76e1-81bf-d67ac446d892",
<     "turnId": "019c9303-3af1-7143-88a1-73132f771234"
<   }
< }
```
2026-02-25 05:16:35 +00:00
viyatb-oai
e8afaed502
Refactor network approvals to host/protocol/port scope (#12140)
## Summary
Simplify network approvals by removing per-attempt proxy correlation and
moving to session-level approval dedupe keyed by (host, protocol, port).
Instead of encoding attempt IDs into proxy credentials/URLs, we now
treat approvals as a destination policy decision.

- Concurrent calls to the same destination share one approval prompt.
- Different destinations (or same host on different ports) get separate
prompts.
- Allow once approves the current queued request group only.
- Allow for session caches that (host, protocol, port) and auto-allows
future matching requests.
- Never policy continues to deny without prompting.

Example:
- 3 calls: 
  - a.com (line 443)
  - b.com (line 443)
  - a.com (line 443)
=> 2 prompts total (a, b), second a waits on the first decision.
- a.com:80 is treated separately from a.com line 443

## Testing
- `just fmt` (in `codex-rs`)
- `cargo test -p codex-core tools::network_approval::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core` (unit tests pass; existing
integration-suite failures remain in this environment)
2026-02-20 10:39:55 -08:00
Owen Lin
db4d2599b5
feat(core): plumb distinct approval ids for command approvals (#12051)
zsh fork PR stack:
- https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/12051 👈 
- https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/12052

With upcoming support for a fork of zsh that allows us to intercept
`execve` and run execpolicy checks for each subcommand as part of a
`CommandExecution`, it will be possible for there to be multiple
approval requests for a shell command like `/path/to/zsh -lc 'git status
&& rg \"TODO\" src && make test'`.

To support that, this PR introduces a new `approval_id` field across
core, protocol, and app-server so that we can associate approvals
properly for subcommands.
2026-02-18 01:55:57 +00:00
Michael Bolin
974355cfdd
feat: vendor app-server protocol schema fixtures (#10371)
Similar to what @sayan-oai did in openai/codex#8956 for
`config.schema.json`, this PR updates the repo so that it includes the
output of `codex app-server generate-json-schema` and `codex app-server
generate-ts` and adds a test to verify it is in sync with the current
code.

Motivation:
- This makes any schema changes introduced by a PR transparent during
code review.
- In particular, this should help us catch PRs that would introduce a
non-backwards-compatible change to the app schema (eventually, this
should also be enforced by tooling).
- Once https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/10231 is in to formalize the
notion of "experimental" fields, we can work on ensuring the
non-experimental bits are backwards-compatible.

`codex-rs/app-server-protocol/tests/schema_fixtures.rs` was added as the
test and `just write-app-server-schema` can be use to generate the
vendored schema files.

Incidentally, when I run:

```
rg _ codex-rs/app-server-protocol/schema/typescript/v2
```

I see a number of `snake_case` names that should be `camelCase`.
2026-02-01 23:38:43 -08:00