Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Bolin
e8ef6d3c16
feat: support login as an option on shell-tool-mcp (#7120)
The unified exec tool has a `login` option that defaults to `true`:


3bdcbc7292/codex-rs/core/src/tools/handlers/unified_exec.rs (L35-L36)

This updates the `ExecParams` for `shell-tool-mcp` to support the same
parameter. Note it is declared as `Option<bool>` to ensure it is marked
optional in the generated JSON schema.
2025-11-21 22:14:41 +00:00
Michael Bolin
8e5f38c0f0
feat: waiting for an elicitation should not count against a shell tool timeout (#6973)
Previously, we were running into an issue where we would run the `shell`
tool call with a timeout of 10s, but it fired an elicitation asking for
user approval, the time the user took to respond to the elicitation was
counted agains the 10s timeout, so the `shell` tool call would fail with
a timeout error unless the user is very fast!

This PR addresses this issue by introducing a "stopwatch" abstraction
that is used to manage the timeout. The idea is:

- `Stopwatch::new()` is called with the _real_ timeout of the `shell`
tool call.
- `process_exec_tool_call()` is called with the `Cancellation` variant
of `ExecExpiration` because it should not manage its own timeout in this
case
- the `Stopwatch` expiration is wired up to the `cancel_rx` passed to
`process_exec_tool_call()`
- when an elicitation for the `shell` tool call is received, the
`Stopwatch` pauses
- because it is possible for multiple elicitations to arrive
concurrently, it keeps track of the number of "active pauses" and does
not resume until that counter goes down to zero

I verified that I can test the MCP server using
`@modelcontextprotocol/inspector` and specify `git status` as the
`command` with a timeout of 500ms and that the elicitation pops up and I
have all the time in the world to respond whereas previous to this PR,
that would not have been possible.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/6973).
* #7005
* __->__ #6973
* #6972
2025-11-20 16:45:38 -08:00
Michael Bolin
f56d1dc8fc
feat: update process_exec_tool_call() to take a cancellation token (#6972)
This updates `ExecParams` so that instead of taking `timeout_ms:
Option<u64>`, it now takes a more general cancellation mechanism,
`ExecExpiration`, which is an enum that includes a
`Cancellation(tokio_util::sync::CancellationToken)` variant.

If the cancellation token is fired, then `process_exec_tool_call()`
returns in the same way as if a timeout was exceeded.

This is necessary so that in #6973, we can manage the timeout logic
external to the `process_exec_tool_call()` because we want to "suspend"
the timeout when an elicitation from a human user is pending.








---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/6972).
* #7005
* #6973
* __->__ #6972
2025-11-20 16:29:57 -08:00
Michael Bolin
54e6e4ac32
fix: when displaying execv, show file instead of arg0 (#6966)
After merging https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/6958, I realized that
the `command` I was displaying was not quite right. Since we know it, we
should show the _exact_ program being executed (the first arg to
`execve(3)`) rather than `arg0` to be more precise.

Below is the same command I used to test
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/6958, but now you can see it shows
`/Users/mbolin/.openai/bin/git` instead of just `git`.

<img width="1526" height="1444" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/428128d1-c658-456e-a64e-fc6a0009cb34"
/>
2025-11-19 22:42:58 -08:00
Michael Bolin
e8af41de8a
fix: clean up elicitation used by exec-server (#6958)
Using appropriate message/title fields, I think this looks better now:

<img width="3370" height="3208" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9bbf906-4ba8-4563-affc-62cdc6c97342"
/>

Though note that in the current version of the Inspector (`0.17.2`), you
cannot hit **Submit** until you fill out the field. I believe this is a
bug in the Inspector, as it does not properly handle the case when all
fields are optional. I put up a fix:

https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/pull/926
2025-11-20 04:59:17 +00:00
zhao-oai
fb9849e1e3
migrating execpolicy -> execpolicy-legacy and execpolicy2 -> execpolicy (#6956) 2025-11-19 19:14:10 -08:00
Michael Bolin
13d378f2ce
chore: refactor exec-server to prepare it for standalone MCP use (#6944)
This PR reorganizes things slightly so that:

- Instead of a single multitool executable, `codex-exec-server`, we now
have two executables:
  - `codex-exec-mcp-server` to launch the MCP server
- `codex-execve-wrapper` is the `execve(2)` wrapper to use with the
`BASH_EXEC_WRAPPER` environment variable
- `BASH_EXEC_WRAPPER` must be a single executable: it cannot be a
command string composed of an executable with args (i.e., it no longer
adds the `escalate` subcommand, as before)
- `codex-exec-mcp-server` takes `--bash` and `--execve` as options.
Though if `--execve` is not specified, the MCP server will check the
directory containing `std::env::current_exe()` and attempt to use the
file named `codex-execve-wrapper` within it. In development, this works
out since these executables are side-by-side in the `target/debug`
folder.

With respect to testing, this also fixes an important bug in
`dummy_exec_policy()`, as I was using `ends_with()` as if it applied to
a `String`, but in this case, it is used with a `&Path`, so the
semantics are slightly different.

Putting this all together, I was able to test this by running the
following:

```
~/code/codex/codex-rs$ npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector \
    ./target/debug/codex-exec-mcp-server --bash ~/code/bash/bash
```

If I try to run `git status` in `/Users/mbolin/code/codex` via the
`shell` tool from the MCP server:

<img width="1589" height="1335" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9db6aea8-7fbc-4675-8b1f-ec446685d6c4"
/>

then I get prompted with the following elicitation, as expected:

<img width="1589" height="1335" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21b68fe0-494d-4562-9bad-0ddc55fc846d"
/>

Though a current limitation is that the `shell` tool defaults to a
timeout of 10s, which means I only have 10s to respond to the
elicitation. Ideally, the time spent waiting for a response from a human
should not count against the timeout for the command execution. I will
address this in a subsequent PR.

---

Note `~/code/bash/bash` was created by doing:

```
cd ~/code
git clone https://github.com/bminor/bash
cd bash
git checkout a8a1c2fac029404d3f42cd39f5a20f24b6e4fe4b
<apply the patch below>
./configure
make
```

The patch:

```
diff --git a/execute_cmd.c b/execute_cmd.c
index 070f5119..d20ad2b9 100644
--- a/execute_cmd.c
+++ b/execute_cmd.c
@@ -6129,6 +6129,19 @@ shell_execve (char *command, char **args, char **env)
   char sample[HASH_BANG_BUFSIZ];
   size_t larray;

+  char* exec_wrapper = getenv("BASH_EXEC_WRAPPER");
+  if (exec_wrapper && *exec_wrapper && !whitespace (*exec_wrapper))
+    {
+      char *orig_command = command;
+
+      larray = strvec_len (args);
+
+      memmove (args + 2, args, (++larray) * sizeof (char *));
+      args[0] = exec_wrapper;
+      args[1] = orig_command;
+      command = exec_wrapper;
+    }
+
```
2025-11-19 16:38:14 -08:00
Michael Bolin
056c8f8279
fix: prepare ExecPolicy in exec-server for execpolicy2 cutover (#6888)
This PR introduces an extra layer of abstraction to prepare us for the
migration to execpolicy2:

- introduces a new trait, `EscalationPolicy`, whose `determine_action()`
method is responsible for producing the `EscalateAction`
- the existing `ExecPolicy` typedef is changed to return an intermediate
`ExecPolicyOutcome` instead of `EscalateAction`
- the default implementation of `EscalationPolicy`,
`McpEscalationPolicy`, composes `ExecPolicy`
- the `ExecPolicyOutcome` includes `codex_execpolicy2::Decision`, which
has a `Prompt` variant
- when `McpEscalationPolicy` gets `Decision::Prompt` back from
`ExecPolicy`, it prompts the user via an MCP elicitation and maps the
result into an `ElicitationAction`
- now that the end user can reply to an elicitation with `Decline` or
`Cancel`, we introduce a new variant, `EscalateAction::Deny`, which the
client handles by returning exit code `1` without running anything

Note the way the elicitation is created is still not quite right, but I
will fix that once we have things running end-to-end for real in a
follow-up PR.
2025-11-19 13:55:29 -08:00
Jeremy Rose
c1391b9f94
exec-server (#6630) 2025-11-19 00:20:19 +00:00