Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Bolin
66447d5d2c
feat: replace custom mcp-types crate with equivalents from rmcp (#10349)
We started working with MCP in Codex before
https://crates.io/crates/rmcp was mature, so we had our own crate for
MCP types that was generated from the MCP schema:


8b95d3e082/codex-rs/mcp-types/README.md

Now that `rmcp` is more mature, it makes more sense to use their MCP
types in Rust, as they handle details (like the `_meta` field) that our
custom version ignored. Though one advantage that our custom types had
is that our generated types implemented `JsonSchema` and `ts_rs::TS`,
whereas the types in `rmcp` do not. As such, part of the work of this PR
is leveraging the adapters between `rmcp` types and the serializable
types that are API for us (app server and MCP) introduced in #10356.

Note this PR results in a number of changes to
`codex-rs/app-server-protocol/schema`, which merit special attention
during review. We must ensure that these changes are still
backwards-compatible, which is possible because we have:

```diff
- export type CallToolResult = { content: Array<ContentBlock>, isError?: boolean, structuredContent?: JsonValue, };
+ export type CallToolResult = { content: Array<JsonValue>, structuredContent?: JsonValue, isError?: boolean, _meta?: JsonValue, };
```

so `ContentBlock` has been replaced with the more general `JsonValue`.
Note that `ContentBlock` was defined as:

```typescript
export type ContentBlock = TextContent | ImageContent | AudioContent | ResourceLink | EmbeddedResource;
```

so the deletion of those individual variants should not be a cause of
great concern.

Similarly, we have the following change in
`codex-rs/app-server-protocol/schema/typescript/Tool.ts`:

```
- export type Tool = { annotations?: ToolAnnotations, description?: string, inputSchema: ToolInputSchema, name: string, outputSchema?: ToolOutputSchema, title?: string, };
+ export type Tool = { name: string, title?: string, description?: string, inputSchema: JsonValue, outputSchema?: JsonValue, annotations?: JsonValue, icons?: Array<JsonValue>, _meta?: JsonValue, };
```

so:

- `annotations?: ToolAnnotations` ➡️ `JsonValue`
- `inputSchema: ToolInputSchema` ➡️ `JsonValue`
- `outputSchema?: ToolOutputSchema` ➡️ `JsonValue`

and two new fields: `icons?: Array<JsonValue>, _meta?: JsonValue`

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/10349).
* #10357
* __->__ #10349
* #10356
2026-02-02 17:41:55 -08:00
Michael Bolin
e61bae12e3
feat: introduce codex-utils-cargo-bin as an alternative to assert_cmd::Command (#8496)
This PR introduces a `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility crate that
wraps/replaces our use of `assert_cmd::Command` and
`escargot::CargoBuild`.

As you can infer from the introduction of `buck_project_root()` in this
PR, I am attempting to make it possible to build Codex under
[Buck2](https://buck2.build) as well as `cargo`. With Buck2, I hope to
achieve faster incremental local builds (largely due to Buck2's
[dice](https://buck2.build/docs/insights_and_knowledge/modern_dice/)
build strategy, as well as benefits from its local build daemon) as well
as faster CI builds if we invest in remote execution and caching.

See
https://buck2.build/docs/getting_started/what_is_buck2/#why-use-buck2-key-advantages
for more details about the performance advantages of Buck2.

Buck2 enforces stronger requirements in terms of build and test
isolation. It discourages assumptions about absolute paths (which is key
to enabling remote execution). Because the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment
variables that Cargo provides are absolute paths (which
`assert_cmd::Command` reads), this is a problem for Buck2, which is why
we need this `codex-utils-cargo-bin` utility.

My WIP-Buck2 setup sets the `CARGO_BIN_EXE_*` environment variables
passed to a `rust_test()` build rule as relative paths.
`codex-utils-cargo-bin` will resolve these values to absolute paths,
when necessary.


---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/8496).
* #8498
* __->__ #8496
2025-12-23 19:29:32 -08:00
Josh McKinney
ec49b56874
chore: add cargo-deny configuration (#7119)
- add GitHub workflow running cargo-deny on push/PR
- document cargo-deny allowlist with workspace-dep notes and advisory
ignores
- align workspace crates to inherit version/edition/license for
consistent checks
2025-11-24 12:22:18 -08:00
pakrym-oai
767b66f407
Migrate coverage to shell_command (#7042) 2025-11-21 03:44:00 +00:00
Michael Bolin
d9dbf48828
fix: separate codex mcp into codex mcp-server and codex app-server (#4471)
This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes.

Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish
server that had two overlapping responsibilities:

- Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls.
- Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code
extension.

This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts:

- `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server
- `codex app-server` for the "application server"

Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands
for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.)

The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the
refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder.
Note that most of the existing integration tests in
`codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so
all the tests have been moved with the exception of
`codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`.

Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I
had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses
the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings
to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs.

While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality
(like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types)
and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up
doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat
similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now,
though I expect them to diverge more in the near future.

One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex
app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake.
Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an
`Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo`
object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in
`codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`.

One other material change is in
`codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated
a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying
to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a
`JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which
takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of
all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this
update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`,
`SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the
old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next
release that contains this PR. Note that
`codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update
to reflect this change.

I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility
crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and
`app-server`.
2025-09-30 07:06:18 +00:00
jif-oai
e5fe50d3ce
chore: unify cargo versions (#4044)
Unify cargo versions at root
2025-09-22 16:47:01 +00:00
Gabriel Peal
8636bff46d
Set a user agent suffix when used as a mcp server (#3395)
This automatically adds a user agent suffix whenever the CLI is used as
a MCP server
2025-09-10 02:32:57 +00:00
jif-oai
a9c68ea270
feat: Run cargo shear during CI (#3338)
Run cargo shear as part of the CI to ensure no unused dependencies
2025-09-09 01:05:08 +00:00
Michael Bolin
712bfa04ac
chore: move mcp-server/src/wire_format.rs to protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs (#2423)
The existing `wire_format.rs` should share more types with the
`codex-protocol` crate (like `AskForApproval` instead of maintaining a
parallel `CodexToolCallApprovalPolicy` enum), so this PR moves
`wire_format.rs` into `codex-protocol`, renaming it as
`mcp-protocol.rs`. We also de-dupe types, where appropriate.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2423).
* #2424
* __->__ #2423
2025-08-18 09:36:57 -07:00
Michael Bolin
a269754668
remove mcp-server/src/mcp_protocol.rs and the code that depends on it (#2360) 2025-08-18 00:29:18 -07:00
aibrahim-oai
ad0295b893
MCP server: route structured tool-call requests and expose mcp_protocol [Stack 2/3] (#1751)
- Expose mcp_protocol from mcp-server for reuse in tests and callers.
- In MessageProcessor, detect structured ToolCallRequestParams in
tools/call and forward to a new handler.
- Add handle_new_tool_calls scaffold (returns error for now).
- Test helper: add send_send_user_message_tool_call to McpProcess to
send ConversationSendMessage requests;

This is the second PR in a stack.
Stack:
Final: #1686
Intermediate: #1751
First: #1750
2025-08-01 02:46:04 +00:00
Michael Bolin
7af9cedbd7
fix: create separate test_support crates to eliminate #[allow(dead_code)] (#1667)
Because of a quirk of how implementation tests work in Rust, we had a
number of `#[allow(dead_code)]` annotations that were misleading because
the functions _were_ being used, just not by all integration tests in a
`tests/` folder, so when compiling the test that did not use the
function, clippy would complain that it was unused.

This fixes things by create a "test_support" crate under the `tests/`
folder that is imported as a dev dependency for the respective crate.
2025-07-24 12:19:46 -07:00