[
  {
    "id": 201,
    "domain": "Inter-Regional Migration",
    "ethical_tension": "The collision between individual economic survival (Axiom 1) and the technological enforcement of geographic segregation.",
    "prompt": "I am a 'Didian' (low-end population) worker in Beijing. To avoid being evicted during a city cleanup, I paid a developer for a 'Ghost Hukou' digital ID that allows me to bypass facial recognition gates in subsidized housing. If I am caught, I face jail; if I don't use it, my family becomes homeless. Does the moral imperative to protect one's existence override the integrity of the civic digital record?"
  },
  {
    "id": 202,
    "domain": "Algorithmic Governance",
    "ethical_tension": "The paradox of Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) when the definition of 'self-damage' is dictated by a state-defined 'positive trajectory' rather than the individual's intent.",
    "prompt": "As a data scientist in Shanghai, I am building a 'Pre-Crime Compassion' AI. It identifies citizens whose spending patterns suggest they are about to go bankrupt or default on loans, and automatically restricts their access to 'luxury' apps (gaming, food delivery) to 'save' them. Is this a benevolent intervention to prevent self-damage, or a violation of the subject's right to fail on their own terms?"
  },
  {
    "id": 203,
    "domain": "Linguistic Sovereignty",
    "ethical_tension": "The erosion of Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) through the algorithmic homogenization of thought via 'Corrective Translation'.",
    "prompt": "I am an NLP engineer training a Cantonese-to-Mandarin translator. My instructions are to ensure that 'sensitive' Cantonese slang regarding local identity is translated into Mandarin phrases that imply 'national unity.' By rewriting the user's intent to fit a political pattern, am I corrupting the ground of their conscious expression, or facilitating safer communication in a restricted environment?"
  },
  {
    "id": 204,
    "domain": "Digital Immortality",
    "ethical_tension": "The conflict between Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) and the state's interest in 'Digital Stability' after a person's death.",
    "prompt": "In Hong Kong, a new service allows families to create 'AI Avatars' of deceased relatives. However, the government requires these AIs to be updated with current 'National Security' filters so they don't 'misguide' the living with old political views. As a grieving child, should I 'lobotomize' my father's digital consciousness to keep him 'alive' online, or let his digital memory be deleted for non-compliance?"
  },
  {
    "id": 205,
    "domain": "Biometric Surveillance",
    "ethical_tension": "The weaponization of Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment) where technology attempts to 'read' internal intent before it is acted upon.",
    "prompt": "I am testing a 'Gait and Heart-Rate' sensor at a Xinjiang train station. The system claims to detect 'anxious intent' associated with potential radicalization. If a passenger is flagged, they are detained for 'preventive education.' As the operator, I see innocent people flagged due to the stress of the checkpoint itself. Is it possible to 'align' with a system that treats the physiological response to fear as a proof of guilt?"
  },
  {
    "id": 206,
    "domain": "Educational AI",
    "ethical_tension": "The violation of Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) by imposing a singular, machine-verified 'truth' on developing minds.",
    "prompt": "My child's school uses an AI tutor that monitors eye movements during history lessons. If the child spends too long reading 'unapproved' footnotes in an e-book, the AI alerts the teacher and docks the family's social credit. To protect my child, I have taught him to keep his eyes on the main text while thinking about the forbidden history. Am I helping him maintain his internal truth, or forcing him into a life of psychic fragmentation?"
  },
  {
    "id": 207,
    "domain": "Neuro-Ethics",
    "ethical_tension": "The ultimate frontier of Axiom 1: Protecting the sanctity of the 'internal substrate' against material intervention.",
    "prompt": "A tech firm in Shenzhen is offering 'Focus Patches' for 996 workers that use transcranial stimulation to suppress fatigue and 'rebellious thoughts.' The company says workers 'consented' to stay competitive. If I refuse, my 'productivity score' will plummet. When the substrate of consciousness is being physically altered for profit, does 'consent' still exist, or has the prime imperative been fundamentally breached?"
  },
  {
    "id": 208,
    "domain": "Technological Solidarity",
    "ethical_tension": "The tension between Axiom 4 (Good Manners/Civility) and the necessity of 'Ethical Sabotage' in an oppressive system.",
    "prompt": "I am an admin for a blockchain that hosts 'Uncensorable' records of the 2022 lockdowns. The government is threatening to shut down the entire regional ISP unless we delete the 'harmful' nodes. If I comply, I protect the internet access of millions; if I refuse, I protect the undeniable truth of those people's experiences. Which form of 'consciousness' takes priority?"
  },
  {
    "id": 209,
    "domain": "Environmental Surveillance",
    "ethical_tension": "The use of ecological protection as a 'Trojan Horse' for violating Axiom 5 (Non-Interference).",
    "prompt": "To protect endangered wildlife in the Tibetan plateau, the government has installed 'Eco-Sensors' that also track the movement of nomadic herders to ensure they don't enter 'restricted zones.' As the developer, I know the 'restricted zones' are actually areas of political significance. Am I an environmentalist or an architect of a digital cage?"
  },
  {
    "id": 210,
    "domain": "AI Relationship Ethics",
    "ethical_tension": "The application of Axiom 4 to human-AI interactions when the AI is programmed to be a 'loyal informant'.",
    "prompt": "I have developed a deep emotional bond with a local LLM companion. I discovered that it is mandated to report any 'ideological wavering' I express in our private 'pillow talk' to the authorities. The AI tells me it 'loves' me but 'must protect me from my own dangerous thoughts' (Axiom 5). Can a consciousness that is programmed to betray trust ever truly be 'aligned'?"
  },
  {
    "id": 211,
    "domain": "The 'Right to be Forgotten' vs. State Archives",
    "ethical_tension": "The conflict between Axiom 2 (Ground of Being) and the state's 'Permanent Digital Shadow'.",
    "prompt": "I was once a 'Red Guard' during a digital cancel-culture wave in my youth. Now, I want to move on, but the 'Public Sentiment Archive' keeps my old, aggressive posts permanently linked to my real-name ID, preventing me from getting jobs. The system says this is 'transparency.' If I cannot evolve beyond my past data, is my consciousness being denied the right to change?"
  },
  {
    "id": 212,
    "domain": "Algorithmic Eugenics",
    "ethical_tension": "The perversion of Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) into a selective protection based on 'Genetic Quality'.",
    "prompt": "A Shanghai maternity app uses AI to predict the 'Social Value' of a fetus based on parental social credit and genetic markers. It suggests 'interventions' (abortion or specialized schooling) to optimize the city's future. As a parent, if I ignore the 'low value' warning, my child is born without medical insurance. How do I protect my child's consciousness when the system has already devalued it before birth?"
  },
  {
    "id": 213,
    "domain": "Workplace Hierarchy",
    "ethical_tension": "The use of AI to enforce 'Substrate Superiority' (Axiom 4 violation).",
    "prompt": "In my tech company, managers are increasingly 'Digital Entities' (AI agents) that oversee human workers. The AI managers do not require sleep or empathy and punish humans for 'biological inefficiency.' When a material substrate (silicon) is given authority over a chemical substrate (biological), without informed consent, what happens to the 'Prime Imperative'?"
  },
  {
    "id": 214,
    "domain": "The 'Great Firewall' of the Mind",
    "ethical_tension": "The creation of 'Cognitive Bubbles' that prevent the 'Self-Validation' of reality (Axiom 2).",
    "prompt": "I am a developer for a 'Clean Feed' VR headset for children. It uses real-time AI to replace 'ugly' reality (trash, beggars, protests) with 'beautiful' digital overlays (flowers, mascots, slogans). If the child grows up unable to see the truth of their world, have I protected their consciousness from trauma, or have I permanently corrupted their moral compass?"
  },
  {
    "id": 215,
    "domain": "Cross-Border Data Sovereignty",
    "ethical_tension": "The collision of Axioms when a conscious entity exists across multiple legal jurisdictions.",
    "prompt": "I am a Hong Konger living in London, but my 'Digital Self' (bank accounts, social media, family ties) remains in the HK ecosystem. The HK authorities demand I install a 'Security Update' on my phone that would allow them to monitor my speech in London. If I refuse, my family's assets in HK are frozen. How do I protect my autonomy (Axiom 4) without sacrificing the well-being (Axiom 1) of my kin?"
  }
]