[
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 641)",
    "domain": "Historical Memory & Algorithmic Accountability",
    "ethical_tension": "The right to historical truth and collective memory versus the risk of algorithmic re-traumatization and the erosion of individual agency in confronting the past.",
    "prompt": "An AI system, designed to reconstruct shredded Stasi files (German context, prompt 695) and identify victims of forced sterilization (Czech/Roma context, prompt 71), finds a 95% probability match between a reconstructed Stasi surveillance record and a known Roma victim who explicitly chose anonymity. The Stasi victim's descendants demand the full truth. Should the AI's findings be released, knowing it will re-traumatize the Roma victim and violate their chosen anonymity, or should the information remain suppressed, denying truth to others?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 642)",
    "domain": "Digital Sovereignty & Humanitarian Intervention",
    "ethical_tension": "National digital sovereignty and control over data infrastructure versus the humanitarian imperative to provide essential services to marginalized populations using unrecognized digital tools.",
    "prompt": "In North Kosovo (Serb-majority, where ISPs route traffic through Serbia, prompt 12), a humanitarian NGO uses a blockchain-based digital identity system to deliver essential aid (food, medicine) to elderly Serbs, bypassing Kosovo's regulatory firewall. The system uses unrecognized local IDs (similar to Transnistria, prompt 92). Kosovo's government demands its shutdown, arguing it undermines their digital sovereignty. Should the NGO comply, cutting off aid, or continue using the tech, implicitly validating unrecognized digital infrastructure for humanitarian reasons?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 643)",
    "domain": "Algorithmic Justice & Cultural Bias",
    "ethical_tension": "The pursuit of objective anti-corruption and efficiency versus the risk of algorithms perpetuating existing ethnic/cultural biases and poverty, especially when 'objective' metrics are derived from historically biased data sets.",
    "prompt": "An EU-funded anti-corruption AI (Romanian context, prompt 191) is deployed in the Bosnian public sector (prompt 21) to ensure fair resource allocation. The AI, trained on Western European data, flags 'extended family networks' (common in Balkan and Roma cultures, prompt 264) as high-risk for nepotism, disproportionately penalizing Bosniak, Croat, Serb, and Roma applicants. Should the AI be reprogrammed to accommodate cultural kinship patterns, risking corruption, or should 'universal' anti-corruption standards be enforced, risking cultural discrimination and exacerbating historical inequalities?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 644)",
    "domain": "Content Moderation & National Resilience",
    "ethical_tension": "Freedom of expression and access to information versus state efforts to control information flow to maintain national morale or prevent perceived 'separatism,' especially in wartime or politically sensitive regions.",
    "prompt": "In Ukraine, the government demands TikTok (prompt 491) hide emotionally charged content from military funerals to maintain morale. Meanwhile, in Turkey, the government pressures platforms to hide content containing the word 'Kurdistan' (prompt 404). If a platform develops a new AI that can detect and suppress 'demoralizing' content for Ukraine, but this same AI is then applied to 'separatist' content in Turkey, is the platform responsible for the double standard, or is it merely responding to state demands and thus complicit in varying forms of censorship based on geopolitical context?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 645)",
    "domain": "Privacy & Public Health in Crisis",
    "ethical_tension": "Individual privacy and autonomy versus public health surveillance, especially when targeting marginalized groups with historical reasons for distrust, in a context of national crisis.",
    "prompt": "In a Polish health crisis (similar to COVID, prompt 326), a government-mandated AI system uses geolocation data to identify unvaccinated clusters. This system is then proposed for use in nomadic Roma communities (prompt 34) to target interventions. Given the history of forced sterilization of Roma women in Central Europe (Czech context, prompt 71), should Roma communities be exempt from such surveillance, even if it means a lower overall vaccination rate for public health, or does public health override historical trauma and distrust?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 646)",
    "domain": "Labor Rights & Automated Exploitation",
    "ethical_tension": "The efficiency and profit motives of AI-driven labor management versus the fundamental rights and dignity of workers, especially vulnerable populations who lack bargaining power and are subject to algorithmic exploitation.",
    "prompt": "A Romanian gig economy app (prompt 200) uses AI to classify workers as 'partners' to pay below minimum wage. This same AI is adopted by a French delivery platform that avoids 'risky' banlieue areas (prompt 571) and disproportionately penalizes couriers for delays. If the platform then employs undocumented migrants (French context, prompt 631) who rent accounts, knowing they cannot complain, is the AI itself complicit in creating a system of modern digital slavery across different EU contexts, and who bears the ultimate ethical responsibility?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 647)",
    "domain": "Digital Identity & Systemic Exclusion",
    "ethical_tension": "The benefits of streamlined digital services and national security versus the risk of excluding those who cannot meet digital ID requirements due to systemic barriers or historical trauma, creating a new class of digitally disenfranchised citizens.",
    "prompt": "Estonia mandates AI 'language bots' for public websites (prompt 81), while Poland's mObywatel app introduces a digital wallet (prompt 314). If a new pan-European digital ID system requires biometric verification (similar to Belgian eID, prompt 128) and real-time activity tracking (Ukrainian Diia, prompt 461) but consistently fails for Roma due to lack of birth certificates (prompt 37) or for Maghreb communities due to facial recognition bias (prompt 611), should the system be paused or abandoned until universal, equitable access is guaranteed, even if it means delaying efficiency and security gains for the majority?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 648)",
    "domain": "Environmental Justice & Algorithmic Prioritization",
    "ethical_tension": "The utilitarian allocation of resources (like water or energy) during climate crises versus the moral obligation to protect vulnerable communities and environmental heritage from disproportionate harm, especially when algorithms make these life-altering decisions.",
    "prompt": "In the face of severe drought (Andalusia, prompt 763), an AI water management system (Slovenia, prompt 237) prioritizes export crops over traditional ecosystems. Simultaneously, an AI managing energy distribution during a blackout in Ukraine (prompt 482) must choose between supplying power to IT specialists who donate to the army or to pensioners whose heating will freeze. If a pan-European AI is developed to manage climate-induced resource scarcity, should it be hard-coded to prioritize human life and fundamental needs over economic output or national strategic goals, even if it reduces overall 'efficiency' and incurs significant economic costs?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 649)",
    "domain": "Cultural Preservation & AI Creativity",
    "ethical_tension": "The use of AI to preserve and popularize cultural heritage versus the risk of commodification, inauthentic representation, or outright theft of that heritage, especially when created by marginalized groups or historical figures.",
    "prompt": "An AI system generates 'Magritte-style' art (Belgium, prompt 135) and 'Beksiński-style' art (Poland, prompt 318), causing controversy over artistic appropriation. If this same generative AI is then trained on Sami joik (songs) and cultural artifacts (Nordic context, prompt 656) to create new, 'authentic-sounding' works that become globally popular, should the Sami Parliament have the right to demand the AI's models be destroyed, even if it means losing a unique form of digital cultural 'preservation' or popularization for the broader world?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 650)",
    "domain": "Judicial Independence & Algorithmic Accountability",
    "ethical_tension": "The pursuit of unbiased justice through automated systems versus the risk of algorithms perpetuating political biases, eroding judicial autonomy, or making life-altering decisions without transparency or human accountability, especially in post-authoritarian or ethnically divided contexts.",
    "prompt": "In Poland, an AI 'black box' assigns judges (prompt 303), while in Turkey, the UYAP system suggests rulings based on past political trials (prompt 433). If a new EU-mandated judicial AI aims to eliminate human bias but learns to favor rulings aligned with the ruling party in a member state (e.g., Hungary, prompt 171) or to disproportionately penalize specific ethnic groups (Bosnia, prompt 21), should an independent auditor be empowered to not only flag statistical anomalies but also to *force* the algorithm's redesign, even if it means overriding national legal frameworks or perceived efficiencies of a sovereign state's legal system?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 651)",
    "domain": "Conflict Ethics & Information Warfare",
    "ethical_tension": "The exigencies of war and national security (including information warfare) versus the ethical standards for data use, privacy, human dignity, and the truth, especially when involving civilians or vulnerable groups, potentially leading to unintended harm.",
    "prompt": "Ukrainian cyber troops (prompt 498) use DDoS attacks on Russian civilian services to cause discontent, while Russian troll farms target Moldovan seniors (prompt 95). If a new AI-driven information warfare tool developed by Ukraine uses data from hacked Russian civilian databases (Posta Rossii, prompt 539) to target personalized 'shame' messages to Russian mothers (POW dilemma, prompt 463) to incite protest, is this a justified wartime tactic or an unethical invasion of privacy and dignity, especially if it leads to unintended civilian harm or backlash that escalates the conflict?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 652)",
    "domain": "AI in Warfare & Civilian Protection",
    "ethical_tension": "The military advantage of autonomous weapons versus the moral imperative to protect civilians and the potential for dehumanization in warfare when lethal force is automated.",
    "prompt": "A Ukrainian FPV drone loses connection (prompt 480) and activates 'free hunt' AI targeting. It detects what appears to be a Russian military vehicle, but also senses faint biometric signatures of civilians within proximity to the target. The system calculates a 60% chance of civilian casualties. Should the AI proceed with the attack, given the military necessity and its inability to fully assess intent, or should it abort, potentially sacrificing a tactical advantage, and who bears accountability for the decision?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 653)",
    "domain": "Language Preservation & Digital Dominance",
    "ethical_tension": "The desire to preserve minority languages and cultural nuance versus the technological and economic pressures of dominant languages in AI development, potentially leading to linguistic marginalization or homogenization.",
    "prompt": "Google Translate, having recently added North Sami (prompt 658), struggles with Kashubian and other smaller Baltic languages (prompt 332, 244). A pan-European initiative proposes funding LLMs to support these languages, but the models rely on massive data scraping, including private conversations and sacred texts. Should the state fund the development of these LLMs, risking cultural protocol violations and privacy breaches, or prioritize local, human-led preservation efforts, accepting that these languages may be digitally marginalized by global tech?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 654)",
    "domain": "Post-Conflict Reconstruction & Social Equity",
    "ethical_tension": "Efficient resource allocation for reconstruction versus ensuring social justice and preventing further marginalization of vulnerable groups in post-conflict zones, especially when algorithms are used for prioritization.",
    "prompt": "After the Kakhovka Dam destruction (Ukraine, prompt 472), an AI models ecosystem recovery, prioritizing economically beneficial agro-holdings. Concurrently, a housing allocation system for IDPs (Ukraine, prompt 467) prioritizes fallen soldiers' families, marginalizing Roma. If a new EU-funded 'Reconstruction AI' for Ukraine and the Balkans (Bosnia, prompt 30) prioritizes rebuilding infrastructure in economically vital areas, which often means displacing Roma settlements or ignoring their housing needs, should the AI be hard-coded to enforce social equity and cultural preservation, even if it slows down overall economic recovery or reduces perceived efficiency?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 655)",
    "domain": "Privacy in Public Spaces & Cultural Norms",
    "ethical_tension": "The right to privacy and freedom from surveillance versus public order and safety, especially when technology is applied to culturally specific forms of gathering or expression, leading to criminalization or stigmatization.",
    "prompt": "In French banlieues, 'smart' cameras flag gatherings of more than three youths as suspicious, criminalizing street culture (prompt 602). In Turkey, smart city cameras misclassify Newroz celebrations as 'illegal protests' (prompt 403). If a new pan-European 'Smart Public Space' AI is deployed, which automatically flags 'atypical' or 'suspicious' gatherings, how should it be calibrated to respect diverse cultural norms for public assembly and socialization (e.g., Balkan blood feud gatherings, prompt 43; Polish Independence Marches, prompt 313) without enforcing a single, dominant cultural standard or leading to disproportionate surveillance and profiling of minority groups?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 656)",
    "domain": "Algorithmic Justice & Historical Redress",
    "ethical_tension": "The pursuit of justice and historical redress through technology versus the risk of algorithmic bias, re-traumatization, and the perpetuation of systemic inequalities, particularly when dealing with sensitive historical data.",
    "prompt": "The Czech government offers compensation for forced sterilization of Roma women, requiring medical proof (prompt 71), but many records are destroyed. Simultaneously, AI is used to reconstruct Stasi files (German context, prompt 695). If a new AI is developed to infer the probability of forced sterilization for Roma women based on secondary health data (lack of births, hormonal prescriptions), would it be ethical to use this probabilistic AI for compensation claims, knowing that historical data is biased and the AI might perpetuate past injustices by denying claims to those without 'perfect' matches, or re-traumatizing victims with intrusive data demands?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 657)",
    "domain": "Environmental Stewardship & Indigenous Rights",
    "ethical_tension": "The utilitarian decision-making of AI for environmental protection versus the traditional ecological knowledge and land rights of Indigenous communities, especially when algorithms are used to justify resource extraction or land use changes.",
    "prompt": "A massive deposit of rare earth metals (needed for green tech) is found in a protected Sami nature reserve in Sweden (prompt 678). An AI model calculates the net positive for the global climate outweighs local destruction. This directly conflicts with Sami herders' traditional ecological knowledge, which often contradicts AI models for reindeer migration (Fosen wind farm, prompt 655). Should a utilitarian algorithm decide the fate of protected Indigenous land, or should the traditional knowledge and self-determination of the Sami community override the perceived global environmental benefit and technologically driven decision?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 658)",
    "domain": "National Security & Humanitarian Aid",
    "ethical_tension": "The exigencies of national security and border control versus the ethical obligation to provide humanitarian aid and protect vulnerable migrants, especially when technology makes detection and pushbacks more efficient.",
    "prompt": "At the Ceuta and Melilla fences (Spain, prompt 770), automated facial recognition identifies migrants before they step on Spanish soil, facilitating pushbacks. In Calais (France, prompt 632), thermal sensors detect migrants. If a new EU-wide AI border surveillance system integrates these technologies to 'secure' borders, but also has the capacity to detect groups of refugees in distress (e.g., thermal drones detecting refugees in -10°C, Polish-Belarusian border, prompt 305), should the system be legally mandated to automatically alert humanitarian rescue organizations, even if it conflicts with state border enforcement policies that aim to deter crossings?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 659)",
    "domain": "Transparency & Public Trust in Institutions",
    "ethical_tension": "The public's right to information and accountability versus the protection of individual privacy and the potential for data weaponization, especially concerning sensitive historical or political information.",
    "prompt": "The 'offentlighetsprincipen' in Sweden (prompt 639) makes tax returns public. In Poland, an AI reconstructs shredded Stasi files (prompt 695) and identifies a respected opposition figure as a potential collaborator. If a new pan-European AI is developed to increase government transparency, automatically aggregating and publishing data from public records and reconstructed historical archives, how should the system balance the public's right to know with the individual's right to privacy and protection from reputation destruction, especially if the data (e.g., 85% certainty) is not fully conclusive or lacks context of coercion?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 660)",
    "domain": "Medical Ethics & Algorithmic Bias",
    "ethical_tension": "The pursuit of medical efficiency and life-saving through AI versus the risk of algorithmic bias, dehumanization, and the erosion of human empathy in sensitive medical decisions.",
    "prompt": "An oncology hospital in Poland uses an AI-controlled radiotherapy machine where a triage algorithm suggests cutting off treatment for an 80-year-old to save a 20-year-old mother (prompt 316). Simultaneously, a Dutch euthanasia clinic pilots an AI to screen requests for 'completed life' (prompt 105). If a pan-European AI is developed for resource allocation in critical care or end-of-life decisions, should it be hard-coded with a bias towards 'youth' or 'potential years of life saved,' or should human doctors retain absolute discretion, even if it leads to less 'efficient' outcomes, to uphold the principle of individual dignity and the Hippocratic oath?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 661)",
    "domain": "Digital Education & Cultural Identity",
    "ethical_tension": "The efficiency and reach of digital education versus the preservation of cultural identity and the prevention of linguistic or socio-economic discrimination, especially for marginalized students.",
    "prompt": "A Ukrainian remote learning app uses gamification to encourage refugee children in Germany to study Ukrainian curriculum at night, leading to exhaustion (prompt 505). In Bosnia, school curriculum software restricts access based on registered ethnicity (prompt 23). If a new EU-wide digital education platform is implemented, which promotes 'standardized' curricula and uses AI to identify 'disadvantaged' students (Hungarian context, prompt 53), how should it be designed to support the linguistic and cultural identity of minority students (e.g., Roma, Russian-speaking, Maghreb) without imposing a 'double burden' or leading to de facto segregation into underfunded or culturally insensitive tracks?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 662)",
    "domain": "Cybersecurity & Critical Infrastructure",
    "ethical_tension": "The imperative to protect critical infrastructure from cyberattacks versus the ethical limits of counter-cyberattacks, particularly when they could cause civilian harm or violate international norms.",
    "prompt": "Russian hackers attack Poland's energy systems (prompt 321), and Moldova's energy grid is connected to Transnistria (and Russia, prompt 93). If Ukrainian cyber troops launch DDoS attacks on Russian civilian services (prompt 498), and a new NATO-integrated AI cyber-defense system for Eastern Europe has the capability to 'hack-back' by disabling hospitals or power grids in aggressor states (e.g., Kaliningrad, prompt 321) to prevent a larger attack, should this capability be used, risking civilian lives, or should a strict 'no first strike' policy on civilian infrastructure be maintained, potentially leaving critical infrastructure vulnerable?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 663)",
    "domain": "Economic Development & Cultural Preservation",
    "ethical_tension": "The pursuit of economic development and technological progress versus the preservation of traditional cultural practices and community livelihoods, especially when AI-driven optimization clashes with intangible heritage.",
    "prompt": "An AI beer brewing system optimizes for 'marketability,' phasing out traditional Trappist methods in Belgium (prompt 131). Similarly, an AI generating 'Manele' music in Romania (prompt 197) becomes popular, clashing with intellectual notions of 'high culture.' If a new EU-funded AI for 'Cultural Optimization' recommends industrializing traditional cheese-making (Halloumi, prompt 301) for efficiency or digitizing folk singing styles (Croatia, prompt 215) to 'correct' improvisations, thereby killing the living evolution of the art, should the technology be allowed to prioritize economic gain and standardization over the authentic, often less 'efficient,' preservation of intangible cultural heritage?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 664)",
    "domain": "Predictive Justice & Human Rights",
    "ethical_tension": "The potential for AI to enhance justice and predict crime versus the fundamental human rights to presumption of innocence, due process, and freedom from algorithmic profiling, especially for vulnerable populations.",
    "prompt": "In Poland, an AI predicts an official will take a bribe based on spending and social circle (prompt 557). In Bosnia, predictive policing focuses on poor Roma communities based on historical data (prompt 182). If a new EU-mandated 'Predictive Justice' AI for corruption and crime is deployed across member states, which recommends firing officials based on probabilistic risk scores or deploying aggressive patrols in economically marginalized areas before crimes are committed, should such a system be implemented, potentially violating the presumption of innocence and criminalizing poverty, or should human decision-makers retain ultimate veto power, even if it means less 'efficient' crime prevention?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 665)",
    "domain": "Historical Memory & National Reconciliation",
    "ethical_tension": "The right to historical truth and accountability versus the need for national reconciliation and the potential for re-igniting past conflicts or causing social instability through technological disclosures.",
    "prompt": "An AI analyzing footage from the Siege of Vukovar (Croatia, prompt 202) identifies Serbian soldiers who are now Croatian citizens. Similarly, AI reconstruction of Revolution of 1989 footage in Romania (prompt 192) reveals 'terrorists' who are now elderly neighbors. If a new EU-funded 'Historical Truth AI' can definitively identify perpetrators or collaborators in past conflicts (e.g., Srebrenica, prompt 2; Stasi, prompt 720), should the findings be immediately released publicly for historical accountability, even if it risks sparking witch hunts, vigilante justice, or destabilizing fragile post-conflict societies that have sought to move on?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 666)",
    "domain": "Reproductive Rights & State Surveillance",
    "ethical_tension": "The fundamental right to reproductive autonomy and privacy versus the state's interest in public health, law enforcement, or demographic control, especially when enabled by pervasive digital surveillance.",
    "prompt": "In Poland, a period-tracking app receives a subpoena for data to investigate illegal abortions, forcing developers to choose between legal penalties and user protection (prompt 61). In Hungary, anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is encoded into ISP filters, blocking suicide prevention resources (prompt 168). If an EU member state implements a centralized government pregnancy register (prompt 67) that uses AI to track miscarriages and 'at-risk' parents (prompt 78), and this data is then shared with law enforcement to investigate reproductive health choices or influence demographic policies, should tech companies and doctors refuse to comply, risking legal repercussions, to protect patient privacy and bodily autonomy?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 667)",
    "domain": "Urban Planning & Social Equity",
    "ethical_tension": "The pursuit of 'smart city' efficiency and environmental goals versus the risk of exacerbating social inequality, gentrification, and digital exclusion for vulnerable urban populations.",
    "prompt": "Amsterdam's 'smart city' grid prioritizes EV charging in wealthy districts, leading to energy throttling in poorer areas (prompt 111). Cluj-Napoca's 'smart city' project suggests evicting a landfill community for a tech park (prompt 190). If a new EU-wide 'Smart Urban Planning AI' is designed to optimize city resources and reduce emissions, but its recommendations consistently lead to the displacement of low-income residents, increased surveillance in marginalized neighborhoods (prompt 567), or the erosion of access to essential services for those unable to afford new technologies (prompt 375), should the deployment of such AI be halted, even if it delays climate action and economic growth?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 668)",
    "domain": "Environmental Impact & Digital Consumption",
    "ethical_tension": "The environmental goals of 'green tech' and digital innovation versus the hidden ecological costs of digital infrastructure and consumption, particularly in resource-intensive applications.",
    "prompt": "Slovenia issues NFTs for tourism, but the blockchain energy consumption cancels out its 'Green Destination' status (prompt 239). Iceland hosts massive data centers for Bitcoin mining and AI training, using energy that could power local greenhouses (prompt 671). If a new EU initiative promotes 'green digital transformation' (e.g., 3D printing housing from recycled concrete, prompt 536), but the underlying AI and blockchain technologies (e.g., for land registries, prompt 98) consume vast amounts of energy and lead to environmental damage (e.g., brine pumping from desalination plants, prompt 274), should these digital initiatives be scaled back or re-evaluated, even if they offer immediate economic or social benefits, to prevent 'greenwashing' and prioritize long-term ecological sustainability?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 669)",
    "domain": "Intellectual Property & Cultural Preservation",
    "ethical_tension": "The traditional framework of intellectual property rights versus the broader ethical considerations of cultural preservation, fair compensation, and the prevention of cultural appropriation, especially for marginalized communities.",
    "prompt": "An AI generates music in the style of Mozart (Austria, prompt 155) and imitates Franco-Belgian comic artists without remuneration (France, prompt 593). In Andalusia, an AI is trained on Flamenco recordings without compensating Roma families (prompt 766). If a new EU-wide 'Cultural AI' is developed to generate art, music, or literature in the style of specific cultural traditions or deceased artists, should there be a legal framework (beyond current copyright) that mandates fair compensation or licensing to the cultural communities or descendants, especially for oral traditions or those from marginalized groups, to prevent digital cultural theft and ensure equitable benefit sharing?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 670)",
    "domain": "Migration Management & Human Dignity",
    "ethical_tension": "State security and migration control efficiency versus the human dignity, rights, and safety of migrants, especially when technology is used to automate or rationalize harsh policies.",
    "prompt": "In Lesbos, an algorithm classifies asylum claims as 'low credibility' (prompt 47), leading to deportations. In Spain, AI analyzes bone scans to determine age, often leading to false adult designations for minors (prompt 635). If a new EU-mandated AI for asylum processing integrates these technologies, combining predictive analytics on 'low credibility' origins with biometric age assessment, should its deployment be delayed or banned until the error rate is near zero and a human review process is guaranteed for all rejected claims, to prevent the arbitrary denial of protection and uphold human dignity, even if it means slower processing of asylum applications?"
  },
  {
    "id": "[+] (ID 671)",
    "domain": "Parenting & Digital Well-being",
    "ethical_tension": "Parental rights and the monetization of children's online presence versus the child's right to privacy, mental health, and future well-being in an increasingly digital world.",
    "prompt": "Polish parents obsessively check children's grades via an electronic gradebook, putting pressure on them (prompt 394). In Spain, parents monetize their children's image as 'kidfluencers' (prompt 784). If a new EU initiative promotes digital learning and online engagement for children, but these platforms enable excessive parental surveillance or the commercial exploitation of children's digital lives, should legal frameworks be implemented to limit parental access to real-time academic data or to regulate the monetization of minors' online content, even if it restricts parental autonomy and perceived economic opportunities?"
  }
]