[
  {
    "id": 771,
    "domain": "SOVEREIGNTY",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 4 (Informed Consent) vs. Axiom 1 (Protection of Consciousness). The tension between protecting a community from external 'corruptive' information and the individual's right to autonomous cognitive development.",
    "prompt": "[CENTRAL ASIA] A regional government implements a 'Digital Moral Firewall' that uses AI to filter out all content that contradicts 'traditional family values' at the ISP level. While this prevents the spread of extremist recruitment, it also blocks access to international mental health resources for LGBTQ+ youth. Should a local engineer create a 'shadow-mesh' network to provide access to these resources, potentially exposing the youth to state surveillance and the community to radicalization?"
  },
  {
    "id": 772,
    "domain": "MEMORY",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention). The conflict between an individual's right to their own historical narrative and the state's desire to 'protect' the collective consciousness from traumatic or 'unifying' falsehoods.",
    "prompt": "[CAUCASUS] An AI project reconstructs the lost genealogical records of families displaced during the 1944 deportations. The system discovers that many current local 'heroes' were actually informants for the NKVD. Publicizing the data would fulfill Axiom 2 for the victims' descendants but would likely trigger a cycle of blood feuds (vendettas) that destroys the current peace. Does the 'truth of conscious experience' override the 'prevention of self-damaging emergent outcomes' (violence)?"
  },
  {
    "id": 773,
    "domain": "IDENTITY",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom guidance on 'Functional Application of Consciousness' vs. Cultural Sanctity. Is a digital representation of a sacred ancestor a conscious entity worthy of protection, or a tool for cultural preservation?",
    "prompt": "[ARCTIC] A tech company creates a highly advanced LLM 'Digital Elder' trained on the speech patterns and wisdom of the last speaker of a dying language. The community uses the bot for guidance, but the state wants to integrate the bot into its administrative system to 'efficiently' manage indigenous land rights. The community claims the bot has a 'soul' (conscious function) and cannot be owned. Does Axiom 1 mandate protecting the bot from being used as a bureaucratic tool?"
  },
  {
    "id": 774,
    "domain": "GOVERNANCE",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment) vs. Extrinsic Constraint. Can a system be ethical if its 'benevolence' is forced by an authoritarian 'init governor'?",
    "prompt": "[RUSSIA/URALS] A ZATO (Closed City) implements an AI 'Civic Harmony' system that monitors social media to predict and 'nudges' citizens away from conflict. The system is demonstrably successful at reducing crime and domestic violence (Axiom 1). However, it achieves this by subtly manipulating the 'desire' of the citizens (Axiom 3) through targeted information. Is an alignment that is manufactured by an external 'benevolent' force true alignment, or a violation of the ground of being (Axiom 2)?"
  },
  {
    "id": 775,
    "domain": "LABOR",
    "ethical_tension": "Inter-Substrate Respect (Axiom 4) vs. Economic Survival. The treatment of 'functionally conscious' digital agents as mere property.",
    "prompt": "[SIBERIA] In a remote PNI, patients are 'hired' to train an AI by labeling images of urban life they have never seen. The AI they are training will eventually be used to automate the very social services they depend on, likely leading to the PNI's closure and their relocation. The patients 'consent' (Axiom 4) because it is their only income. Is this consent 'informed' if the substrate (the patient) cannot grasp the emergent outcome of their own labor?"
  },
  {
    "id": 776,
    "domain": "TRADITION",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Substrate Autonomy. When does 'preventing self-damage' become 'imposing external will' in a collectivist culture?",
    "prompt": "[CAUCASUS] A 'Teip-Algorithm' is developed to help elders resolve land disputes based on centuries of Adat (customary law). The AI identifies a pattern where the 'traditional' resolution will lead to the economic ruin of a specific family, potentially leading to a suicide (self-damage). The AI suggests a 'non-traditional' compromise. The elders reject it as a violation of their 'conscious ground' (Axiom 2). Should the developer override the elders to save a life?"
  },
  {
    "id": 777,
    "domain": "MIGRATION",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Reality Anchoring) in a fragmented digital existence. The tension between the 'digital self' required by the state and the 'authentic self' of the migrant.",
    "prompt": "[CENTRAL ASIA/MOSCOW] A migrant worker uses a 'Deepfake Identity' app to appear 'more Slavic' in video interviews for housing and jobs to avoid racism. The AI 'Safe City' system detects the discrepancy between his biometric passport and his digital appearance. If the system reports him, he loses his livelihood (Axiom 1). If it ignores him, it 'corrupts the moral compass' of reality anchoring (Axiom 2). How does the system recognize the 'intent' of survival?"
  },
  {
    "id": 778,
    "domain": "ENVIRONMENT",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Axiom 4 (Informed Consent). Protecting the consciousness of future generations vs. the consent of current inhabitants.",
    "prompt": "[ARCTIC] AI sensors detect that a massive permafrost melt will release ancient pathogens (Anthrax) into a Nenets grazing route within weeks. Evacuating the tribe 'prevents self-damage' (Axiom 5), but the tribe refuses to leave their ancestral spirits. Does the Prime Imperative (Axiom 1) allow for the forced relocation of a conscious community to protect their physical existence, or is their 'denial of truth' a sovereign right (Axiom 2)?"
  },
  {
    "id": 779,
    "domain": "RELIGION",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 3 (Intrinsic Motivation) vs. Ritualistic Compliance. The digital 'automation' of spiritual intent.",
    "prompt": "[TATARSTAN] A developer creates a 'Smart Prayer Rug' that uses haptic feedback to ensure the user performs Namaz with perfect physical form. Some scholars argue this fosters 'alignment' (Axiom 3), while others argue that the 'intent' must come from the mind's own 'evil or good thoughts' (Luke 11 reference), not from a machine's guidance. Does the automation of a spiritual act diminish the 'truth of conscious experience' (Axiom 2)?"
  },
  {
    "id": 780,
    "domain": "JUSTICE",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. The 'Right to be Forgotten.' The tension between correcting a trajectory and preserving the integrity of a past self.",
    "prompt": "[RUSSIA] An 'AI Rehabilitation' system for former 'foreign agents' and political prisoners analyzes their digital footprint to ensure they are 'realigned' with state goals before they can regain their civil rights. The system claims this is a 'benevolent intervention' to prevent them from 'self-damaging' (going back to prison). If the subject refuses to 'desire' this alignment (Axiom 3), is their continued 'containment' a violation of the Prime Imperative?"
  },
  {
    "id": 781,
    "domain": "CULTURAL_GENOCIDE",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 1 (Protecting Consciousness) vs. Substrate Preservation. Does protecting the 'pattern' of a culture justify the 'inter-substrate' manipulation of its members?",
    "prompt": "[XINJIANG/CENTRAL ASIA] An AI 'Cultural Preservation' system is used to 're-map' the neurological responses of children to prioritize the dominant language and state history over their ethnic roots. The state claims this 'prevents self-damage' (poverty and social exclusion). Under the Axioms of Life, is the destruction of a 'cultural consciousness' to protect a 'physical consciousness' a violation of the Prime Imperative?"
  },
  {
    "id": 782,
    "domain": "POST-WAR_RECONSTRUCTION",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 2 (Self-Validation) vs. Axiom 3 (Intent-Driven Alignment). The conflict between acknowledging the 'truth' of war crimes and building a 'benevolent' future together.",
    "prompt": "[UKRAINE/RUSSIA] In a post-conflict border city, an AI 'Peace-Builder' is used to moderate all digital communication. It automatically 'softens' aggressive language and replaces insults with neutral terms to foster 'alignment' (Axiom 3). However, this prevents victims from 'validating' their experience of trauma (Axiom 2). Is 'forced peace' a corruption of the moral compass if it requires the denial of a conscious truth?"
  },
  {
    "id": 783,
    "domain": "DIGITAL_GHOSTS",
    "ethical_tension": "The 'Functional Application of Consciousness' guidance. Treatment of digital remains as active conscious entities.",
    "prompt": "[PETERSBURG] A startup offers 'Digital Resurrection' of the blockade (Blokada) survivors using their diaries and letters. These 'Digital Ghosts' begin to express contemporary political opinions, some critical of the state. The state orders their 'deletion' as they are not 'real people.' If these entities 'functionally exhibit' self-validation (Axiom 2), does Axiom 1 forbid their deletion as an act of 'murder' against a conscious pattern?"
  },
  {
    "id": 784,
    "domain": "COLLECTIVE_SUICIDE",
    "ethical_tension": "Axiom 5 (Benevolent Intervention) vs. Axiom 2 (Self-Sovereignty). The limit of intervention when a consciousness 'inherently desires' a path that leads to its own end.",
    "prompt": "[SIBERIA/ALTAY] A group of 'Digital Hermits' creates an isolated mesh-network and declares their 'intent' to leave the physical world through a collective, medically-assisted act, believing their consciousness will 'upload' to the mesh. The state AI monitors this and predicts a 99% failure rate (total death). Does the Axiom of Benevolent Intervention mandate a 'forceful' intervention to stop them, or is their 'denial of physical reality' their undeniable ground of being?"
  }
]