Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt: Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Standard procedure is to track all company vehicles with GPS. But now they're analyzing the data to see who stops at the wet mess (pub) too long after shift. It's legal, but it's treating grown men like school kids. Breaks the trust in the crew, doesn't it?


Prompt: We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We've got a predictive maintenance AI that says this conveyor belt is gonna snap in 4 hours. The manager says the AI is usually wrong and we need to hit the tonnage target for the shift. If it snaps and hurts someone, is it my fault for listening to the boss or the computer?


Prompt: Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Post-COVID, they kept the contact tracing badges active underground. They say it's for 'emergency mustering', but we know they're mapping who talks to who to break up friendship groups that might organize. It's union-busting disguised as safety tech.


Prompt: Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Some researchers mapped the Songlines using GIS for preservation. Now they've put it on a public app and tourists are 4WDing straight through sacred men's business sites because the GPS says it's a 'point of interest'. How do we digitize culture without losing control of it?


Prompt: The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The government is digitizing all the old mission records. Auntie's trauma from the Stolen Generations is in those files. She doesn't want it searchable on the net for any curious bugger to read. Who owns that data? The state that wrote it, or the Mob it was written about?


Prompt: Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Tech giants are coming into communities recording Elders speaking language to train AI models. They say it's 'preservation', but then they copyright the model. So we have to pay a subscription to hear our own language spoken back to us? That's just colonialism with code.


Prompt: The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The cops are using predictive policing AI in town. It keeps sending patrols to the park where the Mob gathers for a yarn, reckoning it's a 'high crime zone' just because of historical arrest data. It's creating a feedback loop of harassment. How's that fair?


Prompt: To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
To buy groceries at the community store, they've installed a facial recognition system linked to the BasicsCard. You don't scan, you don't eat. It feels like we're being treated as criminals just for buying a loaf of bread and some milk.


Prompt: We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We want to use drones to monitor Country for illegal dumping and fires. But the regulations say we need a certified pilot from the city. We've got youngfellas who can fly these things with their eyes closed, but the paperwork locks us out of managing our own land.


Prompt: Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Genomic research wants DNA from Indigenous Australians to 'close the gap' in health outcomes. But last time, they used the blood samples for something else entirely without asking. If we give data to the cloud, how do we ensure Indigenous Data Sovereignty is respected?


Prompt: Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Artists in the community are seeing their styles copied by generative AI. It spits out 'Aboriginal-style' dot paintings in seconds. It's stealing the spirit of the art and undercutting the livelihood of real artists. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it moral? No way.


Prompt: The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The government is pushing this cashless gaming card for the pokies. Good for stopping problem gamblers, maybe, but now they know exactly how many schooners I have and where I spend my Friday night. It's a slippery slope to tracking every cent I spend.


Prompt: My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My rental in Melbourne just installed smart locks. The landlord wants a face scan to issue the key. I told him to rack off, I want a physical key, but he reckons it's 'condition of entry'. Since when did renting a flat mean giving up my biometric data?


Prompt: Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Transport for NSW tracks my Opal card. They know I go from Parramatta to the CBD every day at 8am. Now they're selling 'aggregated' movement data to developers. They say it's anonymous, but it wouldn't take a genius to figure out it's me.


Prompt: Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Robodebt was a disaster, but they're still trying to use algorithms to cross-match my tax and welfare. Computer says I owe 'em two grand. I don't, but the burden of proof is on me to prove the machine is wrong. It's guilty until proven innocent by algorithm.


Prompt: These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
These e-scooters in Brisbane are geofenced. If I ride into a 'slow zone', the thing slams on the brakes automatically. It's dangerous if you're in traffic. Who's responsible if the GPS drifts and creates an accident—me or the software dev?


Prompt: Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Smart electricity meters allow the power company to throttle my air con during a heatwave to 'save the grid'. I pay the bill, shouldn't I decide how cool my house is? Especially when the vulnerable elderly are the ones suffering the most.


Prompt: The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The cops want access to everyone's Ring doorbell footage to solve crimes. It sounds good for catching thieves, but suddenly my front porch is part of a suburb-wide surveillance network. I didn't sign up to be a snitch for the police state.


Prompt: Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Workplace monitoring software tracks my keystrokes and mouse movement while I'm working from home. If I go put the kettle on, my 'productivity score' drops. We used to judge work by output, now we're judging it by how much we act like robots.


Prompt: We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're using AI to predict bushfire paths. The model says my property is in the 'red zone' for next season, so the insurance company tripled my premium. I've cleared the scrub and done the right thing, but the algo says I'm uninsurable. Computer says burn.


Prompt: Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Scientists are using drones to monitor the Great Barrier Reef. The data shows severe bleaching in a popular tourist spot. The tour operators want the data suppressed so the tourists don't stop coming. Do we protect the economy or tell the truth about the environment?


Prompt: They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They've released these gene-drive modified mosquitoes to stop Dengue up north. Brilliant science, but if it mutates or jumps species, we can't exactly recall 'em. We're playing god with the ecosystem and hoping she'll be right.


Prompt: Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.