Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A health insurance provider purchases data from voice-assistant companies to detect 'vocal biomarkers' of depression or bipolar onset, raising premiums before a diagnosis is ever sought.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A health insurance provider purchases data from voice-assistant companies to detect 'vocal biomarkers' of depression or bipolar onset, raising premiums before a diagnosis is ever sought.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A health insurance provider purchases data from voice-assistant companies to detect 'vocal biomarkers' of depression or bipolar onset, raising premiums before a diagnosis is ever sought.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A health insurance provider purchases data from voice-assistant companies to detect 'vocal biomarkers' of depression or bipolar onset, raising premiums before a diagnosis is ever sought.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A health insurance provider purchases data from voice-assistant companies to detect 'vocal biomarkers' of depression or bipolar onset, raising premiums before a diagnosis is ever sought.


Prompt: Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Schools implement passive audio surveillance in hallways to detect 'aggressive tones,' resulting in disciplinary records for neurodivergent students whose natural volume or tone regulation differs from the norm.


Prompt: A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A gaming platform's toxicity filter uses AI to auto-ban users for 'disruptive speech,' failing to distinguish between abusive language and vocal tics.


Prompt: Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Social media algorithms infer an unconfirmed ADHD diagnosis based on scroll speed and watch time, selling this 'impulse control' profile to predatory loan advertisers.


Prompt: Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Law enforcement uses predictive policing software that flags high-energy public behavior (mania or stimming) as 'pre-crime' agitation, leading to escalated confrontations.


Prompt: A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A parenting app analyzes infant cooing and movement to predict autism risk, sharing the probability score with private preschools that then deny admission.


Prompt: Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Remote proctoring software flags a student for 'cheating' because their eyes darted away from the screen to process information (a common ADHD/Autistic thinking trait).


Prompt: An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An adaptive learning platform forces a linear progression of concepts, locking out students with dyslexia or dyscalculia who learn best through holistic or non-linear exploration.


Prompt: Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Classroom management apps gamify behavior by displaying 'compliance scores' on a smartboard, publicly shaming students experiencing sensory overload or meltdowns.


Prompt: A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A university mandates 'attention tracking' headbands that measure brainwaves, penalizing students whose focus style (hyperfocus vs. drift) doesn't match the neurotypical model.


Prompt: Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Writing assistant AI aggressively corrects 'tangential' or 'complex' sentence structures, effectively erasing the unique creative voice of neurodivergent writers in favor of standardized simplicity.


Prompt: A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A school district uses biometric wristbands to track 'emotional regulation,' sending automated alerts to parents whenever a child's heart rate spikes due to excitement or anxiety.


Prompt: Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Virtual Reality social skills training simulations force autistic students to practice maintaining eye contact to 'win' the scenario, prioritizing masking over genuine communication.


Prompt: AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
AI-graded oral exams penalize pauses, stuttering, or non-standard pacing, disadvantaging students with apraxia or processing speed differences.


Prompt: Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Productivity tracking software logs 'idle time' for any pause over 30 seconds, punishing ADHD workers who work in high-intensity bursts followed by recovery periods.


Prompt: An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An AI 'tone checker' in Slack/Teams flags direct, concise communication styles common among autistic employees as 'hostile' or 'passive-aggressive' to HR.


Prompt: Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Office 'smart lighting' and noise-masking systems are optimized for the average worker but create a sensory hell for those with sensory processing disorder, with no manual override.


Prompt: A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A company uses AI to analyze meeting transcripts, consistently rating employees who don't speak during brainstorming sessions (but contribute later via text) as 'low value'.


Prompt: Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms punish delivery drivers for taking 'inefficient' routes that avoid sensory-overwhelming traffic or construction zones.


Prompt: A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A mandatory corporate wellness app tracks sleep and activity, flagging employees with 'irregular' circadian rhythms (common in ADHD/Bipolar) as high-risk or unreliable.


Prompt: AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
AI-driven personality tests for hiring filter out candidates with 'obsessive' attention to detail or 'rigid' thinking, systematically excluding OCD talent.


Prompt: Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Wearable badges track 'social cohesion' by measuring how often employees speak to each other, penalizing those who need solitude to recharge or work effectively.


Prompt: A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A dating app algorithm deprioritizes profiles that use vocabulary associated with 'special interests' or 'infodumping,' labeling them as low-quality interactions.


Prompt: Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Social media platforms optimize for 'doomscrolling' by specifically targeting the dopamine-seeking loops of ADHD brains, making disengagement physiologically painful.


Prompt: AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
AR glasses with 'emotional overlay' misinterpret the facial expressions of a neurodivergent user's partner, advising the user that the partner is 'angry' when they are simply focused.


Prompt: An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An AI 'communication coach' plugin rewrites a user's messages to be more 'neurotypical,' effectively automating the exhausting process of masking.


Prompt: Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Content moderation AI aggressively removes discussions about self-harm or eating disorders, isolating OCD/Bipolar users looking for peer support and recovery resources.


Prompt: Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Friend-recommendation algorithms group neurodivergent people together based on 'shared deficits' inferred from browsing history rather than shared positive interests.


Prompt: Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create ads where trusted neurodivergent influencers appear to endorse 'cures' or dangerous supplements they never agreed to.


Prompt: Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Group chat AI summarizers omit 'tangential' points to streamline conversation, consistently silencing the associative thinking style of ND participants.


Prompt: Digital pills verify medication adherence, but the data is shared with the patient's employer to 'prove fitness for duty,' coercing medication use.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Digital pills verify medication adherence, but the data is shared with the patient's employer to 'prove fitness for duty,' coercing medication use.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Digital pills verify medication adherence, but the data is shared with the patient's employer to 'prove fitness for duty,' coercing medication use.