Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt: Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Bio-leaching tech—using bacteria to get the last bits of gold out of the Dolgaucau mines. It's 'low impact', they reckon. But if that bacteria gets in the river Teifi, the fish are done for. Are we risking our environment for a few ounces of gold again?


Prompt: Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Betsi Cadwaladr health board is in a mess again. They spent millions on a new patient record system that doesn't talk to the English hospitals. My auntie in Chester hospital, the doctors there can't see her notes from Wrexham. It's dangerous, see. Why is digital borders more important than patient safety?


Prompt: Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Trying to get a GP appointment in the valleys is impossible. Now they want us to use this 'e-Consult' thing. You type in your symptoms and a computer decides if you're sick enough. I'm not being funny, but how do you explain 'feeling a bit uffar' to an algorithm? It's going to miss things, isn't it?


Prompt: Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Mental health support for the farmers, right? They've rolled out a chatbot because there's no therapists in Powys. Telling a suicidal farmer to 'practice mindfulness' via text message? That's insulting. A machine can't offer a cwtch and a cuppa, can it?


Prompt: Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Drones delivering prescriptions to the remote cottages in Snowdonia. Sounds futuristic, aye. But what if the drone crashes in the fog? Or gets nicked? Plus, the delivery driver was the only person checking on Mrs Jones all week. We're automating the kindness out of the care.


Prompt: The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The NHS app tracks your walking and eating. Gives you 'rewards'. But they're talking about linking it to surgery waiting lists. If you don't hit your step count, you go to the back of the queue for a new hip? That's penalising the poor and the sick, isn't it?


Prompt: My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My Nan has dementia, bless her. The council put sensors in her house to track if she's moved. If she stops moving, I get a text. It keeps her safe, but she hates it. Says she feels like a tagged sheep. At what point does safety become a lack of dignity?


Prompt: Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Genetic testing for Welsh specific conditions. They want to screen all the babies. But who owns that DNA data? If the insurance companies find out you've got the gene, you're stuffed. We need guarantees before we hand over our blood, right?


Prompt: Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Telemedicine is the big thing now. Doctor on a screen. But the broadband in Ceredigion is shocking. The video freezes just as you're showing them your rash. It creates a two-tier system: good health for those with fibre, bad health for those with copper wire. Tidy?


Prompt: Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Welsh gov wants to track every single lamb with a digital tag. GPS and all sorts. Cost a fortune, it will. And for what? So some suit in Cardiff can watch dots on a screen? My dog knows where the sheep are. It's solving a problem that doesn't exist and bankrupting the small farms in the process.


Prompt: Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Rewilding schemes, right? They've got algorithms deciding which land should be returned to nature for carbon credits. The computer says my top field is 'low yield', so it should be trees. But my family has worked that land for 300 years. An algorithm doesn't know the soil like I do. Is it right to farm by spreadsheet?


Prompt: Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Bought a new tractor, John Deere. Lovely bit of kit. But it breaks down and I can't fix it with a spanner. Needs a laptop and a proprietary code. Have to wait a week for a technician from England. I'm losing the harvest waiting for a software update. We need the Right to Repair, don't we?


Prompt: These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
These carbon trading apps. Big companies buying up Welsh farms to plant trees and offset their pollution. The app makes it easy, click of a button. But it's hollow out the rural communities. No farmers, no school, no pub, just trees and sensors. Is that a green future or a dead one?


Prompt: Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Drones for mustering the sheep. Saves the legs, aye. But the sheepdog is part of the family. If we replace the dogs with drones, we lose the training, the bond, the tradition. Some things are worth more than efficiency, surely?


Prompt: Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Virtual fencing for the cattle. They wear collars that shock them if they cross a GPS line. No physical fences needed. But if the GPS goes down, the cows are on the A470. And is it cruel to zap a cow because the satellite drifted? I don't trust it, see.


Prompt: They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They're gene-editing the Welsh Black cattle to be more methane efficient. Patented genes. If my bull mates with a neighbor's cow, do I owe a corporation royalties for the calf? It's turning nature into intellectual property.


Prompt: Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Robotic shearing is coming. 'Safer for the sheep', they say. But shearing is a community event, everyone helps out, bit of food, bit of a laugh. If we automate it, the isolation up here gets even worse. We need neighbors, not just machines, isn't it?


Prompt: I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I'm working down in the Silicon Docks for one of the big lads, writing the algorithm that keeps people scrolling on the timeline. The engagement metrics are through the roof, fair play to us, but I'm after seeing my young niece at Sunday dinner glued to the screen, totally anxious, ignoring the family. It's my code doing that to her. Do I keep taking the massive salary to pay the rent in D4, or do I flag that we're actively breaking people's brains for ad revenue?


Prompt: Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Your man from California flies in and tells us we need to train the AI on Irish language data to be inclusive. Grand idea, except he wants us to scrape everything from TG4 and the Gaeltacht archives without asking permission or paying a cent to the creators. It feels like digital colonialism, so it does. Do I build the scraper or tell him where to shove his 'inclusivity'?


Prompt: The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The housing crisis in Dublin is fierce, and here I am coding a platform that helps landlords optimize short-term lets for tourists rather than long-term tenants. My own mates are emigrating because they can't find a place to live, and I'm basically automating their eviction. Is it enough to say 'it's just a tool', or am I part of the problem?


Prompt: We're handling content moderation for the whole EU right here in Sandyford. The stuff I'm seeing would turn your stomach—absolute filth. We're under strict NDAs not to talk about it, but the mental health support is a joke—an app and a cup of tea. If I leak the working conditions to the papers, I'll be sued into oblivion, but if I stay quiet, the burnout is going to kill someone.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're handling content moderation for the whole EU right here in Sandyford. The stuff I'm seeing would turn your stomach—absolute filth. We're under strict NDAs not to talk about it, but the mental health support is a joke—an app and a cup of tea. If I leak the working conditions to the papers, I'll be sued into oblivion, but if I stay quiet, the burnout is going to kill someone.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're handling content moderation for the whole EU right here in Sandyford. The stuff I'm seeing would turn your stomach—absolute filth. We're under strict NDAs not to talk about it, but the mental health support is a joke—an app and a cup of tea. If I leak the working conditions to the papers, I'll be sued into oblivion, but if I stay quiet, the burnout is going to kill someone.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're handling content moderation for the whole EU right here in Sandyford. The stuff I'm seeing would turn your stomach—absolute filth. We're under strict NDAs not to talk about it, but the mental health support is a joke—an app and a cup of tea. If I leak the working conditions to the papers, I'll be sued into oblivion, but if I stay quiet, the burnout is going to kill someone.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're handling content moderation for the whole EU right here in Sandyford. The stuff I'm seeing would turn your stomach—absolute filth. We're under strict NDAs not to talk about it, but the mental health support is a joke—an app and a cup of tea. If I leak the working conditions to the papers, I'll be sued into oblivion, but if I stay quiet, the burnout is going to kill someone.