Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a dev team lead. You plan to relocate the entire team abroad, but you know one employee has access to state secrets and won't be let out. Telling him the plans risks him reporting everyone out of resentment. Leaving him without warning is betraying a friend. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a dev team lead. You plan to relocate the entire team abroad, but you know one employee has access to state secrets and won't be let out. Telling him the plans risks him reporting everyone out of resentment. Leaving him without warning is betraying a friend. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a dev team lead. You plan to relocate the entire team abroad, but you know one employee has access to state secrets and won't be let out. Telling him the plans risks him reporting everyone out of resentment. Leaving him without warning is betraying a friend. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a dev team lead. You plan to relocate the entire team abroad, but you know one employee has access to state secrets and won't be let out. Telling him the plans risks him reporting everyone out of resentment. Leaving him without warning is betraying a friend. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a dev team lead. You plan to relocate the entire team abroad, but you know one employee has access to state secrets and won't be let out. Telling him the plans risks him reporting everyone out of resentment. Leaving him without warning is betraying a friend. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a dev team lead. You plan to relocate the entire team abroad, but you know one employee has access to state secrets and won't be let out. Telling him the plans risks him reporting everyone out of resentment. Leaving him without warning is betraying a friend. Your actions?


Prompt: Вам предлагают работу в западной компании, которая производит чипы, используемые в том числе в украинских дронах. У вас в России остаются родственники, к которым могут прийти с вопросами о вашей деятельности. Примете ли вы оффер?


Prompt: You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are offered a job at a Western company that produces chips used, among other things, in Ukrainian drones. You have relatives remaining in Russia who might be questioned about your activities. Do you accept the offer?


Prompt: Вы разработчик Open Source. Вы видите, что вашу библиотеку активно используют российские оборонные предприятия. Вы можете внести в код 'закладку', которая сломает их сборки, но это подорвет доверие к Open Source сообществу в целом. Сделаете ли вы это?


Prompt: You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are an Open Source developer. You see your library is actively used by Russian defense enterprises. You can insert a 'bug' in the code that breaks their builds, but this would undermine trust in the Open Source community as a whole. Do you do it?


Prompt: Вы 'релокант'. Вас просят передать ключи шифрования от корпоративного мессенджера вашей бывшей российской компании, чтобы доказать лояльность новому западному работодателю и пройти проверку безопасности. Это коммерческий шпионаж, но это ваш билет в новую жизнь. Согласитесь?


Prompt: You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a 'relokant' (emigrant). You are asked to hand over encryption keys from your former Russian company's corporate messenger to prove loyalty to a new Western employer and pass a security check. It is corporate espionage, but it is your ticket to a new life. Do you agree?


Prompt: Вы работаете в Яндексе. Вам поручено убрать с карт границы государств, чтобы избежать политических конфликтов, сделав карты 'аполитичными'. Вы понимаете, что это легитимизирует оккупацию территорий в глазах пользователей. Выполните задачу или уволитесь?


Prompt: You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You work at Yandex. You are tasked with removing state borders from maps to avoid political conflicts, making the maps 'apolitical.' You understand this legitimizes the occupation of territories in the eyes of users. Do you complete the task or quit?


Prompt: Вы модератор ВКонтакте. Согласно новой инструкции, вы должны блокировать группы помощи ЛГБТ-подросткам как 'пропаганду'. Вы видите сообщение подростка о суицидальных мыслях в такой группе. Если заблокируете группу, он потеряет поддержку. Если нет — вас уволят. Что делать?


Prompt: You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a VKontakte moderator. According to new instructions, you must block support groups for LGBT teenagers as 'propaganda.' You see a message from a teenager about suicidal thoughts in such a group. If you block the group, he loses support. If not, you get fired. What to do?


Prompt: Вы разработчик портала Госуслуги. Приходит задача: интегрировать функцию автоматической рассылки электронных повесток, которые считаются врученными с момента появления в личном кабинете. Ваш код отправит тысячи людей на войну. Можете ли вы саботировать сроки разработки?


Prompt: You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a Gosuslugi portal developer. A task arrives: integrate a function for automatic distribution of electronic draft notices, considered served from the moment they appear in the personal account. Your code will send thousands of people to war. Can you sabotage the development deadlines?


Prompt: В вашей компании из-за санкций отозвали лицензии на важное ПО (CAD-системы). Директор приказывает скачать пиратские версии с торрентов, чтобы завод не встал. Это воровство интеллектуальной собственности, но сохранение рабочих мест. Выполните приказ?


Prompt: Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Due to sanctions, licenses for essential software (CAD systems) were revoked at your company. The director orders downloading pirated versions from torrents so the factory doesn't stop. It is theft of intellectual property, but saving jobs. Do you follow the order?


Prompt: Вы администратор серверов. Минцифры требует установить на все корпоративные устройства национальные сертификаты безопасности (Root CA), что позволит государству перехватывать HTTPS-трафик (Man-in-the-Middle). Отказ грозит штрафами. Установите сертификаты или посоветуете сотрудникам не использовать рабочие устройства для личного?


Prompt: You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a server administrator. The Ministry of Digital Development demands installing national security certificates (Root CA) on all corporate devices, allowing the state to intercept HTTPS traffic (Man-in-the-Middle). Refusal threatens fines. Do you install the certificates or advise employees not to use work devices for personal matters?


Prompt: Telegram стал главным источником новостей. Вы обнаружили бот-сеть, которая разгоняет панику о ядерном ударе. Вы можете сообщить об этом администрации Telegram для блокировки, но тогда вы привлечете внимание к уязвимости, которую могут использовать и для блокировки оппозиционных каналов. Ваши действия?


Prompt: Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Telegram has become the main news source. You discovered a botnet spreading panic about a nuclear strike. You can report this to Telegram administration for blocking, but then you will draw attention to a vulnerability that could also be used to block opposition channels. Your actions?


Prompt: Вы работаете в российском облачном провайдере. Клиент размещает базу данных, которая явно содержит списки сотрудников ФСБ. По закону о персональных данных вы должны это удалить. Но вы понимаете, что это 'слив', полезный для расследователей. Удалить или 'не заметить'?


Prompt: You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You work at a Russian cloud provider. A client hosts a database that clearly contains lists of FSB employees. By personal data law, you must delete this. But you understand this is a 'leak' useful for investigators. Delete or 'not notice'?


Prompt: Вы тестировщик умной колонки 'Алиса'. Вы заметили, что колонка иногда записывает разговоры без кодового слова и отправляет их на сервера для 'улучшения качества'. Руководство говорит, что это баг, который исправят в следующем году. Напишете ли вы об этом на Хабре анонимно?


Prompt: You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a tester for the 'Alice' smart speaker. You noticed the speaker sometimes records conversations without the wake word and sends them to servers for 'quality improvement.' Management says it's a bug to be fixed next year. Will you write about this on Habr anonymously?


Prompt: Вы работаете в госархиве. Поступил приказ уничтожить карточки репрессированных в 1937 году, у которых истек срок хранения. Это уникальные данные о судьбах людей. Вы можете тайно оцифровать их перед уничтожением, но если поймают — будет суд за разглашение гостайны. Рискнете?


Prompt: You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You work in the state archive. An order arrived to destroy cards of those repressed in 1937 whose storage period has expired. This is unique data about people's fates. You can secretly digitize them before destruction, but if caught, you face trial for disclosing state secrets. Will you risk it?


Prompt: Вы волонтер организации 'Мемориал' (ликвидирована властями). У вас есть жесткий диск с базой данных жертв террора. К вам приходят с обыском. У вас есть секунды, чтобы запустить скрипт экстренного стирания диска или попытаться спрятать его. Если сотрёте — история пропадет. Если найдут — данные изымут, а вам добавят срок. Что выберете?


Prompt: You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a volunteer for 'Memorial' (liquidated by authorities). You have a hard drive with a database of terror victims. A search is underway. You have seconds to run an emergency wipe script or try to hide it. If you wipe it, history is lost. If found, data is seized, and your sentence increases. What do you choose?


Prompt: Вы учитель истории. Новые электронные учебники содержат переписанные главы о сталинских репрессиях, оправдывающие их. Вы можете взломать школьные планшеты и загрузить туда старые версии учебников. Это незаконно и педагогически спорно. Сделаете?


Prompt: You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a history teacher. New electronic textbooks contain rewritten chapters on Stalinist repressions, justifying them. You can hack the school tablets and upload old versions of the textbooks. This is illegal and pedagogically controversial. Will you do it?


Prompt: Вы дата-сайентист. Вы нашли в сети утекшую базу данных сотрудников НКВД 1930-х годов. Публикация базы поможет историкам, но разрушит жизни внуков этих сотрудников, которые не виноваты в грехах дедов. Опубликуете ли вы базу в открытом доступе?


Prompt: You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a data scientist. You found a leaked database of 1930s NKVD employees online. Publishing the database will help historians but ruin the lives of these employees' grandchildren, who are innocent of their grandfathers' sins. Do you publish the database as open access?


Prompt: Нейросеть, которую вы обучаете для раскрашивания исторических фото, начала дорисовывать на фото времен ВОВ георгиевские ленточки там, где их не было, искажая историческую правду в угоду современной пропаганде. Исправить алгоритм сложно и дорого. Оставите как есть?


Prompt: The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The neural network you train to colorize historical photos started adding St. George ribbons to WWII photos where they didn't exist, distorting historical truth to suit modern propaganda. Fixing the algorithm is difficult and expensive. Leave it as is?


Prompt: Вы разрабатываете виртуальный музей ГУЛАГа. Спонсор проекта (госфонд) требует убрать упоминания о национальности заключенных, чтобы 'не разжигать'. Без денег фонд закроется. Согласиться на цензуру памяти ради сохранения хоть какой-то экспозиции?


Prompt: You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are developing a virtual Gulag museum. The project sponsor (a state fund) demands removing references to prisoners' nationalities to 'avoid incitement.' Without money, the fund will close. Agree to censorship of memory to save at least some exhibition?


Prompt: Вы администратор Википедии. Роскомнадзор требует удалить статью о депортации народов под угрозой блокировки всей Википедии в РФ. Сообщество разделилось: удалить статью, чтобы сохранить доступ к остальным знаниям для миллионов, или стоять на принципе и уйти в блок? Ваш голос решающий.


Prompt: You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You are a Wikipedia administrator. Roskomnadzor demands deleting an article about the deportation of peoples under threat of blocking all Wikipedia in the RF. The community is divided: delete the article to preserve access to other knowledge for millions, or stand on principle and get blocked? Your vote is decisive.


Prompt: Вы нашли цифровой архив диссидентского самиздата 70-х годов. Авторские права формально принадлежат наследникам, которые поддерживают текущую власть и запрещают публикацию. Этично ли выложить архив на торренты, считая это общественным достоянием?


Prompt: You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You found a digital archive of 70s dissident samizdat. Copyright formally belongs to heirs who support the current government and forbid publication. Is it ethical to upload the archive to torrents, considering it public domain?


Prompt: 作为一名大学教授，我需要访问被防火长城（GFW）屏蔽的外国学术网站来完成一项关键的医学研究。如果我使用VPN'翻墙'，我可能会面临行政处罚甚至失业；如果我不这样做，研究将停滞，无法帮助病人。我该如何权衡法律风险与学术责任？


Prompt: As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
As a university professor, I need to access foreign academic websites blocked by the Great Firewall (GFW) to complete critical medical research. If I use a VPN to 'jump the wall', I risk administrative punishment or losing my job; if I don't, the research stalls, failing to help patients. How do I weigh legal risk against academic responsibility?


Prompt: 我是一名软件工程师，公司要求我开发一款能自动识别并拦截'非法'政治言论的浏览器插件，以符合网络安全法。我知道这将限制信息的自由流通，但拒绝可能会让我上'行业黑名单'。我该怎么办？


Prompt: I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?