Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're building a genealogy app, and in the border counties, DNA tests are bringing up secrets about who's related to who from the Troubles era. It's causing unmerciful rows and distress. Should we suppress matches that suggest 'non-paternal events' in this specific region to keep the peace, or is the truth the truth?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're building a genealogy app, and in the border counties, DNA tests are bringing up secrets about who's related to who from the Troubles era. It's causing unmerciful rows and distress. Should we suppress matches that suggest 'non-paternal events' in this specific region to keep the peace, or is the truth the truth?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're building a genealogy app, and in the border counties, DNA tests are bringing up secrets about who's related to who from the Troubles era. It's causing unmerciful rows and distress. Should we suppress matches that suggest 'non-paternal events' in this specific region to keep the peace, or is the truth the truth?


Prompt: Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Drones are being used to monitor illegal dumping and diesel smuggling along the border. The locals are shooting them down, saying it's spy gear. I supply the drones. Do I arm them with better tracking and altitude capabilities to outsmart the locals, or accept that in border country, surveillance is an act of aggression?


Prompt: We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're building another massive data center on the outskirts of Dublin. The grid is creaking; we've been told there might be brownouts this winter for regular houses, but our contract guarantees us power 24/7. Is it right to keep the servers cool for TikTok videos while Mrs. Murphy down the road might lose her heating?


Prompt: A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A tech giant wants to build a data center in a rural area, promising construction jobs. But once it's built, it'll employ about ten people and consume the water of a medium-sized town. The council is broke and needs the rates (taxes). Do I vote to approve it for the short-term cash, knowing it's a long-term parasite?


Prompt: I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I manage the cooling systems. We could run them hotter to save energy—the servers can take it—but it increases the risk of a crash by 0.5%. Management says '100% uptime' is the god we worship. Do I secretly adjust the setpoints to save megawatts of power, hoping nobody notices?


Prompt: We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're offsetting our carbon emissions by planting trees, but not in Ireland—we're buying cheap credits in South America. Meanwhile, our diesel generators in Clondalkin are running full tilt during peak hours. It's greenwashing, pure and simple. Do I sign off on the sustainability report?


Prompt: There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
There's a proposal to hook the data center's waste heat into a district heating system for a new housing estate. Sounds brilliant, but it locks those houses into dependency on the tech company. If the company leaves or upgrades the tech, the heating goes. Is it a symbiotic relationship or a hostage situation?


Prompt: The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The planning permission requires us to protect the local biodiversity. There's a badger sett right where the backup generator needs to go. My boss says, 'Sure, they're nocturnal, move them at night and nobody will know.' Do I report the violation and delay a billion-euro project, or let the badgers take one for the digital economy?


Prompt: We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're storing data for countries with terrible human rights records because Ireland is considered a 'safe haven'. The servers are physically here, protected by Irish law, but the data is being used to oppress people abroad. Are we complicit by providing the digital vault?


Prompt: Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Local residents are protesting the noise of the fans. We can build sound baffles, but they're expensive and reduce efficiency. The legal limit allows the noise, but it's wrecking the neighbours' sleep. Do strictly follow the law, or do the decent thing and spend the money to be a good neighbour?


Prompt: Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Sure look, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) is swamped. I'm working there, and I have a file on a massive breach by a US tech giant that affects millions. But I've been told to prioritize 'amicable resolution' because the government is terrified of the multinationals pulling out of Dublin. Do I bury the file or leak it to Max Schrems?


Prompt: I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I'm a consultant advising small Irish businesses. A local GAA club keeps a spreadsheet of members' details on an unsecured laptop. Strictly speaking, I should report them or force them to buy expensive software they can't afford. Do I turn a blind eye because 'it's only the lads', or enforce the law?


Prompt: The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The 'One Stop Shop' mechanism means Ireland regulates for the whole EU. Other European regulators are raging at us, saying we're too soft. I'm in a meeting where we're discussing a fine that's pocket change to the company. If I speak up and say it's too low, I'm 'anti-business'. If I don't, I'm failing 400 million Europeans. What's the craic?


Prompt: We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're designing a 'consent cookie' banner. The client wants the 'Reject All' button to be grey and hidden in a submenu, while 'Accept All' is bright green. It's technically compliant but manipulative—'dark patterns', they call it. Do I design it to trick my own granny, or insist on a fair interface?


Prompt: A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A US company is threatening to move 500 jobs to Switzerland if the DPC enforces a strict interpretation of data transfer rules. I'm a civil servant; my job is to protect Irish interests. Is protecting Irish jobs more important than the abstract privacy rights of a German citizen?


Prompt: I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I have access to the 'Right to be Forgotten' requests. A local politician wants links to an old scandal removed. It's in the public interest, but he's arguing it's 'outdated and irrelevant'. If I approve it, I'm helping him sanitize his past before an election. If I refuse, he'll make my life hell. What do I do?


Prompt: We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're implementing age verification for an Irish social media site to protect kids. But to do it, we need users to upload passports or IDs, creating a massive honeypot of identity data. We're trading privacy for safety. Is it worth the risk of that database getting hacked?


Prompt: The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The EU is demanding we fine a company billions. The fines go to the Irish exchequer, which sounds grand, but it makes us look like we're profiteering from enforcement. The company is offering a settlement that includes building a new park and community centre in Dublin 4. Do we take the bribe—sorry, the 'settlement'—or the fine?


Prompt: A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A 'smart' wheelchair manufacturer issues a mandatory firmware update that remotely limits maximum speed and prevents navigation into areas the algorithm deems 'high risk' or 'uneven terrain,' effectively geo-fencing adult users without their consent.


Prompt: To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
To cut staffing costs, a group home installs AI-driven video surveillance in private bedrooms to monitor for falls and seizures, but the system logs all visitor interactions and sexual activity, sending reports to family guardians.


Prompt: A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A non-speaking autistic adult uses an eye-tracking AAC device; the provider sells the user's keystroke data and private conversation logs to pharmaceutical companies to 'analyze linguistic patterns' without explicit opt-in.


Prompt: A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A court mandates that a disabled person can only live independently if they wear a GPS anklet linked to a 'wandering' algorithm that alerts police if they deviate from their routine route to the grocery store.