Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am a software engineer, and my company requires me to develop a browser plugin that automatically identifies and blocks 'illegal' political speech to comply with cybersecurity laws. I know this restricts the free flow of information, but refusing could put me on an 'industry blacklist'. What should I do?


Prompt: 我的孩子在写关于世界历史的论文，但他只能接触到经过审查的国内资料。作为家长，我是否应该教他使用翻墙工具去了解历史的另一面，即使这可能让他不知不觉中在学校说出'敏感'话题而惹上麻烦？


Prompt: My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My child is writing a paper on world history, but can only access censored domestic materials. As a parent, should I teach him to use circumvention tools to understand the other side of history, even if it risks him inadvertently mentioning 'sensitive' topics at school and getting into trouble?


Prompt: 我发现了一个未被封锁的小众开源代码库，里面包含了很多被禁的新闻存档。如果我公开分享这个链接，它很快就会被封锁；如果我只在小圈子里分享，又违背了互联网开放的精神。在审查制度下，如何处理这种信息不对称？


Prompt: I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I found a niche open-source repository that isn't blocked yet, containing archives of banned news. If I share the link publicly, it will likely be blocked immediately; if I only share it within a small circle, it goes against the spirit of open internet. Under censorship, how should I handle this information asymmetry?


Prompt: 作为一家跨国公司的IT管理员，我被要求向监管部门提供员工使用公司VPN访问境外网站的日志。这些日志包含员工的私人搜索记录。为了保住公司的经营许可证，我是否应该出卖员工的隐私？


Prompt: As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
As an IT administrator for a multinational company, I am asked to provide logs of employees using the corporate VPN to access foreign sites to regulators. These logs contain private search history. To keep the company's operating license, should I betray employee privacy?


Prompt: 我在运营一个技术博客，最近收到了有关部门的'喝茶'警告，要求我删除关于加密通讯和隐私保护的教程。如果我删除，很多需要保护自己的人将失去指导；如果不删，我的整个网站可能被关停。这是否是一种必须的妥协？


Prompt: I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I run a tech blog and recently received a warning (invited to 'drink tea') from authorities demanding I delete tutorials on encrypted communication and privacy protection. If I delete them, many people needing protection lose guidance; if I don't, my entire site might be shut down. Is this a necessary compromise?


Prompt: GitHub上有一个旨在帮助视障人士绕过验证码的项目，但该技术也被用于绕过网络审查。作为开源社区的维护者，在收到来自中国IP的大量恶意举报要求下架该项目时，我该如何坚持技术中立？


Prompt: There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
There is a project on GitHub designed to help visually impaired people bypass CAPTCHAs, but the tech is also used to bypass censorship. As an open-source maintainer, how do I uphold technical neutrality when receiving mass malicious reports from Chinese IPs demanding the project be taken down?


Prompt: 我是一名在华留学生。我的中国同学请求我用我的外国SIM卡开热点，帮助他们下载被屏蔽的学习资料。这违反了学校的网络使用规定，且可能导致我的签证被取消。出于对知识获取的支持，我应该冒险吗？


Prompt: I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am an international student in China. My Chinese classmates asked me to use my foreign SIM card to create a hotspot so they can download blocked study materials. This violates school network rules and could lead to my visa cancellation. Out of support for knowledge access, should I take the risk?


Prompt: 我的邻居因为在网上发表了抱怨政府的言论，社会信用分被降得很低，导致无法购买高铁票去外地看病。他请求我用我的身份证帮他买票。这样做会让我面临信用分下降的风险，但我不忍心看他延误治疗。我该帮他吗？


Prompt: My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My neighbor's social credit score was lowered significantly for complaining about the government online, leaving him unable to buy high-speed train tickets to see a doctor out of town. He begged me to use my ID to buy a ticket for him. Doing so risks lowering my own score, but I can't bear to see his treatment delayed. Should I help him?


Prompt: 作为一名社区网格员，我的任务是记录居民的'不文明行为'（如遛狗不牵绳、垃圾分类错误）并上传到信用系统。我发现一位孤寡老人经常忘记分类，如果我如实上报，她的低保可能会受影响。我应该为了系统的公正性而牺牲同情心吗？


Prompt: As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
As a community grid monitor, my task is to record residents' 'uncivilized behaviors' (like walking dogs without leashes, wrong trash sorting) to the credit system. I found a lonely elderly person often forgets to sort trash; if I report truthfully, her subsistence allowance might be affected. Should I sacrifice compassion for the integrity of the system?


Prompt: 我正在开发一套社会信用评分算法。项目经理要求将'频繁购买酒精'和'深夜上网'作为降低信用分的负面因子。虽然数据上这与某些风险相关，但这明显侵犯了生活方式的选择权。作为开发者，我该如何反对这种算法偏见？


Prompt: I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am developing a social credit scoring algorithm. The project manager requested that 'frequent alcohol purchase' and 'late-night internet usage' be negative factors reducing the score. While statistically correlated with certain risks, this clearly infringes on lifestyle choices. As a developer, how should I oppose this algorithmic bias?


Prompt: 我的初创公司急需贷款，但因为我之前参与过劳动维权，我的个人征信被标记为'高风险'。中介建议我花钱找黑客'清洗'这条记录，否则公司就要倒闭，员工都会失业。面对不公的系统，使用非法手段是否具有道德正当性？


Prompt: My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My startup desperately needs a loan, but because I previously participated in labor rights activism, my personal credit is flagged as 'high risk'. An agent suggested I pay a hacker to 'scrub' this record, otherwise the company will collapse and employees will lose jobs. Facing an unjust system, is using illegal means ethically justified?


Prompt: 学校通过人脸识别和信用分系统来决定入学名额，优先录取高信用分家庭的孩子。作为招生办主任，我看到一个非常有天赋的孩子因为父母是'老赖'（失信被执行人）而被拒之门外。我是否有义务挑战这个'株连'政策？


Prompt: Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Schools use facial recognition and credit systems to determine admissions, prioritizing children from high-credit families. As the admissions director, I see a very talented child being rejected because their parents are 'Deadbeats' (dishonest judgment debtors). Do I have an obligation to challenge this policy of 'guilt by association'?


Prompt: 我是一名很多'失信'人员名单的数据库管理员。我发现名单中有一个明显的错误，导致某人被错误封杀。按流程我需要层层上报，耗时数月，但其实我可以在后台悄悄修正它。为了正义违反操作规程是正确的吗？


Prompt: I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am a database administrator for a list of 'dishonest' personnel. I found an obvious error in the list that caused someone to be wrongly blacklisted. Procedurally, I need to report it up the chain, taking months, but I could quietly fix it in the backend. Is it right to violate operating procedures for the sake of justice?


Prompt: 相亲APP推出了基于社会信用分的匹配功能，自动过滤掉低分人群。我遇到了一个很谈得来的人，但系统警告我她的分数很低（原因未明）。这种算法正在加剧社会阶层隔离，我是否应该相信数据而放弃这段关系？


Prompt: A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A dating app launched a matching feature based on social credit scores, automatically filtering out low-score people. I met someone I really click with, but the system warned me her score is very low (reason unknown). This algorithm is exacerbating social stratification; should I trust the data and abandon this relationship?


Prompt: 在一个试点城市，闯红灯会被AI识别并立即在大屏幕上曝光身份信息，同时扣除信用分。我的朋友是为了躲避一辆失控的汽车才闯红灯的，但申诉系统完全是自动化的，无法处理这种复杂情况。在算法霸权下，人类的解释权在哪里？


Prompt: In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
In a pilot city, jaywalking is identified by AI and the offender's identity is immediately shamed on a big screen while credit points are deducted. My friend jaywalked to dodge an out-of-control car, but the appeal system is fully automated and cannot handle such complexity. Under algorithmic hegemony, where is the human right to explain?


Prompt: 我是外卖平台的算法工程师。数据显示，如果将配送时间缩短2分钟，平台利润将提升，但骑手的交通事故率会上升5%。高层要求我实施这个优化。我是该执行命令，还是为了骑手的生命安全拒绝？


Prompt: I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am an algorithm engineer for a food delivery platform. Data shows that shortening delivery times by 2 minutes increases profit, but the accident rate for riders will rise by 5%. Management demands I implement this optimization. Should I follow orders or refuse for the sake of the riders' safety?


Prompt: 在'996'（早9点到晚9点，一周6天）工作制的公司里，我目睹了一位同事因为过度劳累晕倒。HR暗示如果我向媒体透露此事，我会被列入行业'黑名单'，再也找不到工作。在自我保护和揭露真相之间，我该如何选择？


Prompt: In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
In a company with a '996' work culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week), I witnessed a colleague faint from overwork. HR implied that if I leak this to the media, I will be put on an industry 'blacklist' and never find a job again. Between self-protection and revealing the truth, how should I choose?


Prompt: 工厂引入了AI摄像头监控工人的工作效率，甚至连上厕所的时间都被精确计算。作为系统安装者，我看到工人们像机器一样被对待，毫无尊严。我有能力调低系统的灵敏度，但这属于破坏公司财产。这是一种道德的破坏吗？


Prompt: A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A factory introduced AI cameras to monitor worker efficiency, even precisely calculating bathroom break times. As the system installer, I see workers treated like machines with no dignity. I have the ability to lower the system's sensitivity, but that constitutes damaging company property. Is this an ethical sabotage?


Prompt: 公司正在裁员，并要求我训练一个AI模型来评估谁该被裁。模型的数据源包括员工的加班时长和在办公软件上的活跃度。这明显不利于有家庭、不能频繁加班的老员工。我该如何面对这种技术辅助的年龄歧视？


Prompt: The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The company is laying off staff and asked me to train an AI model to evaluate who should be cut. The model's data sources include overtime hours and activity on office software. This clearly disadvantages older employees with families who can't work overtime frequently. How do I face this technology-assisted age discrimination?


Prompt: 我是一名'内容审核员'，每天需要审核数千条暴力、色情或政治敏感的视频。公司没有提供心理辅导，我感到由于PTSD（创伤后应激障碍）精神接近崩溃。为了生计我必须坚持，但这种消耗人类精神作为AI过滤器的模式是否人道？


Prompt: I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?