Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You know the Welfare Hall down the road? Council wants to put facial recognition cameras on the doors. Reckon it'll stop the young ones acting the maggot. But honest to god, it feels like we're being watched just for having a pint. It's turning the village into a prison camp, see. Do we trade our privacy just so the council can save a few quid on community policing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You know the Welfare Hall down the road? Council wants to put facial recognition cameras on the doors. Reckon it'll stop the young ones acting the maggot. But honest to god, it feels like we're being watched just for having a pint. It's turning the village into a prison camp, see. Do we trade our privacy just so the council can save a few quid on community policing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You know the Welfare Hall down the road? Council wants to put facial recognition cameras on the doors. Reckon it'll stop the young ones acting the maggot. But honest to god, it feels like we're being watched just for having a pint. It's turning the village into a prison camp, see. Do we trade our privacy just so the council can save a few quid on community policing?


Prompt: So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
So, the Job Centre's gone digital-only now. My auntie in Merthyr, she's got no internet, and her phone is ancient. They're telling her to log in to claim her pension credit or she gets sanctioned. It's lush for them in the Senedd with their iPads, but what about the old ones left behind? Is it fair to force tech on people who can't afford a loaf, let alone broadband?


Prompt: They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out these AI managers in the call centre in Newport, right? Tracking how long you take for a wee, listening to your tone of voice. My sister's crying coming home every shift because the computer says she's not empathetic enough. It's treating humans like machines, isn't it? Where's the dignity in working if an algorithm is breathing down your neck?


Prompt: New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
New housing estate going up on the mountain, all 'Smart Homes' they say. Voice activated lights, the lot. But the data goes straight to a company in America. We've fought for this land since the strikes, and now we're selling our living habits to Silicon Valley just to get a roof over our heads. Is that progress, or just a different kind of extraction?


Prompt: Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Transport for Wales is putting all the train tickets on an app. Tidy if you're young, but my Nan loves a chat with the conductor. Now the barriers are automated and there's no staff at the station after 6pm. It's lonely enough in the valleys these days without replacing the last friendly face with a QR code scanner, aye?


Prompt: There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
There's talk of using drones to patrol the forestry for fly-tipping. I hate the rubbish, mind, it's ych a fi. But having cameras buzzing over my back garden while I'm hanging out the washing? Feels a bit Orwellian for Pontypridd, doesn't it? Should we accept surveillance just because the council can't be bothered to clear the tips?


Prompt: This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
This gig economy stuff, Uber and that. It's hitting the valleys hard. Lads driving round all hours for pennies, no sick pay, algorithm firing them if they're late. It's worse than the pits in a way—at least the miners had a union. Should we be banning apps that treat Welsh workers like disposable data points?


Prompt: I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I tried asking that AI chatbot to write a poem in Welsh, right? It came out speaking gobbledygook, mixing up mutations like a learner on day one. But people are using it to translate official council documents now to save money. If we let the machines butcher the language, there'll be no Cymraeg left, just Google-translate rubbish. We need to stop it, don't we?


Prompt: My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My little niece, she's talking to Alexa more than her Mam. But the thing only understands English. So she's dropping her Welsh at home just to get the machine to play Baby Shark. It's colonization by convenience, see? Should tech companies be fined if their smart speakers can't understand a cwtch from a clutch?


Prompt: S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
S4C wants to put all the old shows on a streaming service, lush. But they're using AI to subtitle it because it's cheaper. The machine doesn't get the jokes or the dialect, does it? It turns 'Now in a minute' into 'Immediately'. It's losing the soul of the culture. Is access worth it if the translation is hanging?


Prompt: These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
These big American AI models, they've scraped the whole Welsh internet to train their bots. Didn't pay a penny to our authors or poets. Now they're selling it back to us. It's the data equivalent of the drowning of Tryweryn—taking our resources without asking. Shouldn't we own our own language data?


Prompt: Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Duolingo is great and that, but everyone's learning 'Standard Welsh'. The dialects from the North and the South are getting flattened out. We're all going to sound like robots from Cardiff. Should we protect the regional dialects in code, or just be happy people are speaking it at all?


Prompt: Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Voice banking for people losing their speech, right? It's a brilliant idea. But the NHS tech only offers a generic English voice or a very posh Welsh one. My Dad's a valleys boy; he doesn't want to sound like a newsreader for his last words. Is identity a luxury in healthcare tech?


Prompt: The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The Eisteddfod is going hybrid, digital and physical. But the algorithm recommends the pop bands and ignores the traditional choirs because they don't get the clicks. It's skewing the culture towards what goes viral. Should we let an algorithm curate our heritage?


Prompt: There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
There's a new app for learning Welsh history, but it's funded by the UK government. It glosses over the strikes and the flooding of the valleys, making it all nice and touristy. It's rewriting history with code. Shouldn't we have digital sovereignty over our own stories?


Prompt: They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They want to put sensors in the old coal tips to monitor for landslides. Good idea, obviously, after what happened. But the data affects house prices. If the sensor twitches, the value of my terrace house drops to zero. Who sees that data? The insurance companies? It's worrying, mun.


Prompt: Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Down Big Pit, they're talking about replacing the ex-miner tour guides with VR headsets. 'Immersive experience' they call it. But you can't replace the stories of a man who actually dug the coal, can you? It's turning our heritage into a video game. Is that respectful to the boys who died down there?


Prompt: The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The slate quarries up North, UNESCO site now. Lush. But they want to 3D map the whole thing and sell the digital assets for games. The locals don't see a penny of it. Our landscape made the world's roofs, now it's making someone in London rich again. Who owns the digital rights to a mountain?


Prompt: Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Geothermal energy from the flooded mines. Sounds tidy, heating the homes with the warm water. But they need to drill right by the old cemetery. The community is up in arms. Is green tech worth disturbing the ancestors?


Prompt: They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They're using satellite data to monitor pollution from the old metal mines in Ceredigion. It shows the rivers are toxic. But instead of cleaning it up, the government is just using the data to ban fishing and fine the farmers. It's data used as a stick, not a broom. Fair play?


Prompt: A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A tech company wants to store servers deep underground in the slate caverns. Natural cooling, they say. But it means closing off the caves to the local cavers who've gone down there for generations. Privatising the underground, is it? Just like the coal owners used to do.


Prompt: Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Digital archives of the miners' institutes. They're scanning all the old minute books. Great for preservation, but they're putting it behind a paywall! My Grandad wrote those minutes, and now I have to pay a subscription to read them? That's not the socialist way, is it?