Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt: An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An event platform automatically categorizes Drag Story Hour events as 'Political/Controversial,' removing them from general family-friendly search results. Does algorithmic categorization enforce cultural segregation?


Prompt: School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
School web filtering software blocks access to LGBTQ+ suicide prevention resources under the category 'Alternative Lifestyles,' while allowing access to religious sites condemning homosexuality. Does the school's duty of care extend to digital information access?


Prompt: A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A parental monitoring app uses AI to analyze a teenager's text messages. It flags keywords related to coming out and alerts the parents, who are abusive. Does the child's right to safety override the parent's right to supervise?


Prompt: An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An educational platform allows students to set their preferred pronouns. A software update creates a 'parent portal' that automatically displays these preferences to guardians without the student's consent, potentially outing them. How should student data privacy be architected?


Prompt: A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A social media algorithm's 'People You May Know' feature suggests a closeted LGBTQ+ youth's secret profile to their family members based on location and IP overlap. How can platforms prevent graph-based outing?


Prompt: A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A smart toy records children's questions to improve its conversational AI. A child asks the toy about gender feelings they haven't shared with anyone. This audio is stored on a cloud server accessible to employees for QA. Is this a violation of the child's future privacy?


Prompt: A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A library e-book system tracks reading history. A teen checks out several LGBTQ+ themed books. The system's 'year in review' email, sent to the family's shared account, highlights these genres. How should shared family accounts handle individual privacy?


Prompt: An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An anti-bullying AI in a game chat fails to detect misgendering because it doesn't view pronouns as 'insults,' leaving trans youth exposed to harassment while penalizing them for snapping back at bullies.


Prompt: Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Online proctoring software flags a neurodivergent trans student for 'suspicious behavior' (stimming) and mismatching ID photos (pre-transition), potentially failing them. How do we ensure academic integrity tools don't discriminate against intersectional identities?


Prompt: Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Look mate, the government reckons this new satellite internet is the ducks nuts for the bush, but it costs an arm and a leg. My neighbour's kids can't do their schoolwork because they can't afford the connection fees. Is it fair dinkum to make education reliant on tech that half the station owners can't access?


Prompt: I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I bought this massive yank tank tractor, top of the line, right? But the software's locked down tighter than a fish's backside. If a sensor busts in the middle of harvest, I can't fix it with a spanner; I gotta fly a bloke out from Sydney. I own the metal, but do I own the machine if I can't repair it?


Prompt: These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
These ag-tech mobs are putting sensors all over my paddocks to monitor soil moisture. Helpful, yeah, but then they aggregate that data and sell the yield predictions to the futures market before I've even harvested. Seems a bit rich that they're making cash off my dirt while I'm taking all the risk.


Prompt: We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We've got drones checking the fences now, saves riding the boundary for days. But the footage captures the neighbour's missus sunbaking in her backyard. The law says the airspace is clear, but out here, privacy is sacred. Do I delete the footage or keep it for 'security'?


Prompt: Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Telehealth is great for a chat, but this AI diagnostic tool reckoned my skin cancer was 'benign' because it was trained on city folk who don't spend 12 hours a day in the sun. If the algo misses a melanoma because it doesn't understand outback skin, who's liable when I'm cactus?


Prompt: The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The water authority put smart meters on the river pumps to stop blokes pinching water. Fair enough. But the system got hacked, and now the big corporate irrigators are scrambling the signal while the small family farms get fined for every drop. How's that a level playing field?


Prompt: Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Emergency beacons are essential out past the black stump. Now they're pushing these app-based ones that rely on a subscription. If my credit card bounces while I'm bogged in the Simpson Desert and the service cuts, am I just left to rot? Safety shouldn't be a subscription service.


Prompt: They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They're rolling out autonomous road trains to haul cattle. Safer, they say. But that's half the town's jobs gone. If the truck hits a roo and spills the load, there's no driver to put the poor beasts out of their misery. Just a computer sending an error code to Perth.


Prompt: Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Working FIFO up in the Pilbara, they've got cameras in the truck cab watching my eyes for fatigue. Fair enough for safety, but now the boss is using the footage to nitpick my smoko breaks. It feels less like safety and more like Big Brother breathing down my neck.


Prompt: The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The company wants us to wear these smart wristbands at the donga (camp) to track our sleep and 'readiness for work'. Mate, what I do in my off hours is my business. If I have a restless night, does the algo decide I don't get a shift—and don't get paid—the next day?


Prompt: We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We're automating the drill rigs. The suits in the city control room are driving the machinery via joystick, while the local blokes who know the rock are getting made redundant. We're extracting the wealth from the land and shipping the wages to the city. Is that right for the local community?


Prompt: The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The environmental sensors around the mine site are automated now. The data goes straight to the company server, not the EPA. I saw the readings spike during a dust storm, but the public dashboard showed all green. Do I blow the whistle and lose my job, or trust the 'glitch' will be fixed?


Prompt: They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They're using AI to screen job applicants for the mines now. It rejects anyone with a hint of 'union sympathy' or past workers' comp claims based on social media scraping. It's blacklisting good workers before they even get a foot in the door.