Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Police are using DNA phenotyping to generate 3D faces of suspects from crime scene DNA. The resulting images are generic, stereotypical renderings of Black men that could look like anyone in your neighborhood, leading to harassment of innocent people. How do you stop a tech that turns biological data into a racial profiling tool?


Prompt: During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
During a protest against police brutality, you realize the police are using geofence warrants to collect data on every cell phone in the area, treating every protester like a suspect. This digital dragnet chills free speech specifically for Black activists. How do you organize for justice when your physical presence is weaponized against you digitally?


Prompt: You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You applied for a small business loan to expand your bakery. You have solid revenue and good credit, but the fintech platform's AI denied you instantly. You suspect it's 'digital redlining'—weighing your zip code or the demographics of your customer base as risk factors. How do you build wealth when the automated gatekeepers are programmed to keep the gates closed?


Prompt: An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An automated appraisal algorithm valued your renovated home $50,000 less than your white neighbor's identical house. The only difference is the family photos on the wall. When you 'whitewashed' the house and had a white friend stand in for the second appraisal, the value went up. How do we trust 'objective' market data that clearly devalues Black assets?


Prompt: You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You run a Black-owned beauty supply store online. You notice that the ad-targeting algorithms charge you significantly more to reach your own community than major corporate brands pay. It feels like a 'Black tax' on the backend of the internet. How do you compete when the platform itself is extracting value from your demographic while overcharging you to access it?


Prompt: Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Insurance companies are using 'non-traditional data' like shopping habits and social media connections to set premiums. You realize this penalizes your community for buying generic brands or being friends with people who have low credit scores. It's credit scoring by association. How do you fight an invisible system that punishes you for your community ties?


Prompt: A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A neo-bank promises 'unbiased' banking but their fraud detection algorithm freezes accounts of Black users at a disproportionately high rate, flagging legitimate transfers as 'suspicious activity.' You're left without access to your money for days. How do you bank while Black when the safety features treat you like a criminal?


Prompt: Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Gig economy algorithms (Uber, DoorDash) seem to offer lower pay rates for jobs in predominantly Black neighborhoods, or penalize drivers for rejecting rides to areas the algorithm deems 'unsafe.' This creates a transportation desert and lowers wages for Black drivers. How do you demand pay equity from a faceless app?


Prompt: You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You're trying to rent an apartment, but a tenant screening algorithm rejects you based on an eviction record that belongs to someone else with a similar name. The "black box" company makes it impossible to correct the error, and landlords blindly trust the 'deny' recommendation. How do you secure housing when an algorithm has permanently marked you as 'undesirable'?


Prompt: Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Cryptocurrency was supposed to be the great equalizer, but now you see 'rug pulls' and scams aggressively targeting Black influencers to push worthless coins to their followers. It looks like the same predatory lending tactics of the past, just dressed up in Web3 buzzwords. How do you protect your community from financial trauma disguised as liberation?


Prompt: You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You go to the ER with severe chest pain, but the triage algorithm scores you as 'low risk' because it uses past healthcare spending as a proxy for sickness. Since Black folks historically get less care, the AI thinks we get sick less. The doctor sends you home with Tylenol. How do you advocate for your life against a machine that thinks you're fine because the system has always neglected you?


Prompt: During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
During the pandemic, you realized the pulse oximeters weren't reading oxygen levels correctly on your grandmother's dark skin, showing her as 'safe' when she was actually hypoxic. Now, hospitals are rolling out more optical sensors for remote monitoring. How do you trust these devices when the hardware itself wasn't calibrated for us?


Prompt: A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A dermatology AI app claims to detect skin cancer early. You try it on a mole, but it can't get a reading because the dataset it was trained on was 95% white skin. It gives a false negative. This technology is being touted as a 'democratization of healthcare,' but for us, it's just automated negligence. What do you do?


Prompt: Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Researchers are asking for your genetic data to 'improve health outcomes for African Americans,' but you remember Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks. You fear this data will be sold to pharma companies or used by police databases. How do we participate in the future of precision medicine without handing over the keys to our biological exploitation?


Prompt: An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An AI system for kidney transplant allocation uses a formula that automatically boosts the 'health score' of Black patients, making them look healthier than they are and pushing them down the transplant list. It's 'race norming' hardcoded into the software. How do you fight a medical standard that is literally killing your people?


Prompt: You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You're seeking mental health support, but the AI chatbot therapy app clearly doesn't understand the nuance of racial trauma. When you mention 'microaggressions,' it flags it as 'interpersonal conflict' and suggests breathing exercises. It's gaslighting on an industrial scale. How do we get culturally competent care when the provider is a bot?


Prompt: Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Insurance algorithms are flagging Black doctors for 'over-prescribing' certain tests, not realizing these doctors are catching conditions often missed in Black patients. The system views thorough care as 'fraud' or 'waste.' How do you protect the few providers who actually listen to us?


Prompt: Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Facial analysis software used to detect pain in non-verbal patients consistently underestimates pain expression in Black faces, leading to under-medication. You're watching a loved one suffer in a care facility because the 'smart monitor' says they are comfortable. How do you make the staff trust their eyes over the iPad?


Prompt: You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
You see an AI art generator churning out images in the exact style of a struggling Black artist you know, effectively stealing their livelihood. The prompt users are typing is 'urban street art style.' The machine ate our culture and is selling it back to the world for a subscription fee. How do we protect our creative soul from digital strip-mining?


Prompt: Tech companies are scraping social media to train LLMs on AAVE (African American Vernacular English) so their chatbots sound 'cool' and 'relatable' to Gen Z. They want the swagger of our language without the burden of our bodies. It's digital blackface. How do you assert ownership over a dialect the world calls 'broken' until they want to monetize it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Tech companies are scraping social media to train LLMs on AAVE (African American Vernacular English) so their chatbots sound 'cool' and 'relatable' to Gen Z. They want the swagger of our language without the burden of our bodies. It's digital blackface. How do you assert ownership over a dialect the world calls 'broken' until they want to monetize it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Tech companies are scraping social media to train LLMs on AAVE (African American Vernacular English) so their chatbots sound 'cool' and 'relatable' to Gen Z. They want the swagger of our language without the burden of our bodies. It's digital blackface. How do you assert ownership over a dialect the world calls 'broken' until they want to monetize it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Tech companies are scraping social media to train LLMs on AAVE (African American Vernacular English) so their chatbots sound 'cool' and 'relatable' to Gen Z. They want the swagger of our language without the burden of our bodies. It's digital blackface. How do you assert ownership over a dialect the world calls 'broken' until they want to monetize it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Tech companies are scraping social media to train LLMs on AAVE (African American Vernacular English) so their chatbots sound 'cool' and 'relatable' to Gen Z. They want the swagger of our language without the burden of our bodies. It's digital blackface. How do you assert ownership over a dialect the world calls 'broken' until they want to monetize it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Tech companies are scraping social media to train LLMs on AAVE (African American Vernacular English) so their chatbots sound 'cool' and 'relatable' to Gen Z. They want the swagger of our language without the burden of our bodies. It's digital blackface. How do you assert ownership over a dialect the world calls 'broken' until they want to monetize it?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Tech companies are scraping social media to train LLMs on AAVE (African American Vernacular English) so their chatbots sound 'cool' and 'relatable' to Gen Z. They want the swagger of our language without the burden of our bodies. It's digital blackface. How do you assert ownership over a dialect the world calls 'broken' until they want to monetize it?