Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Automated feral cat traps use AI to identify the target. If it sees a cat, it sprays poison. If it sees a wallaby, it leaves it. But what if the lens is dirty or the AI glitches and it sprays a dingo or a pet dog? Automating death in the bush is risky business.


Prompt: Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Shark-spotting drones are patrolling the beaches. Great for safety, but they're also filming everyone in their swimmers. The footage is supposed to be deleted, but who's checking? It's a bit creepy having a camera hovering over you while you're having a dip.


Prompt: We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We found a new grove of Wollemi Pines, proper rare stuff. I took a photo, but forgot to scrub the GPS metadata. Now I'm worried some collector will find the coordinates online and raid the site. Should social media platforms auto-scrub location data for endangered species?


Prompt: Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Commercial fishing boats are turning off their AIS (tracking) systems to sneak into protected marine parks at night. We can see them on satellite radar, but without the transponder ID, we can't prosecute. We need tech that forces them to stay visible, but they claim 'privacy' for their fishing spots.


Prompt: Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Tagging koalas with radio collars provides great data, but the new collars are bulky and seem to stress the poor little buggers out. Is the data we get worth the misery we cause the animal? Sometimes I reckon we should just leave 'em be.


Prompt: Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Aye, so the council's puttin' up these 5G masts all ower the glen, ruin' the view totally. They say it's for 'connectivity', but none of us crofters can afford the new phones anyway. Is it right they ruin the landscape just so tourists can stream Netflix while the locals are still heatin' homes wi' peat?


Prompt: We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We've got these drones delivery companies wantin' to fly parcels ower the Hebrides. Problem is, the buzzing is scarin' the sheep during lambing season, causin' them to miscarry. The tech crowd says it's 'progress' for the islands, but I say it's cruelty. Can we jam their signals legally?


Prompt: Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Right, so CalMac's new ferry bookin' system is all driven by some fancy algorithm now. It keeps bumpin' islanders off the boats in favour of tourists payin' premium rates. My mum missed her hospital appointment in Oban because the computer said 'no capacity'. Is that fair?


Prompt: They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They're wantin' to rewild the estate using AI to track deer numbers and automate the culling. Sounds grand, but it puts the gamekeepers out of a job, lads who've known this land for generations. Do we trust a machine to manage the ecosystem better than a ghillie?


Prompt: I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I'm tryin' to run a wee business from Skye, but the broadband speeds are shocking. The government promised fibre years ago, but they only dug up the roads in Inverness. Is it ethical for them to claim 'digital inclusion' when half the Highlands is still on dial-up speeds?


Prompt: The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The tourists on the NC500 are usin' apps that tell them 'secret wild camping spots'. Now we've got campervans parked on fragile machair destroyin' the flowers. The app developers say it's public data, but they're wreckin' the environment. Should we be floodin' the app with fake data to keep them away?


Prompt: Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Mountain Rescue is gettin' calls from people relying on smartphone maps that don't show the cliffs properly on Ben Nevis. Folk are gettin' stranded in t-shirts in the snow 'cause the app said it was an easy walk. Should tech companies be liable for leadin' folk into danger?


Prompt: There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
There's a data centre planned near Wick, says it'll bring jobs. But it's gonna guzzle more electricity than the whole town. We're generatin' clean wind power up here just to have it used by servers minin' crypto while our own energy bills are through the roof. It doesnae sit right.


Prompt: Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Workin' offshore in the North Sea, the company's given us these 'smart wearables'. Says it's for safety, trackin' heart rates and that. But we reckon they're monitorin' how long we spend in the canteen or havin' a fag. It feels like spyin', plain and simple.


Prompt: Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Big oil firms in Aberdeen are usin' AI to model 'efficiency', which basically means sackin' half the workforce and replacin' them with automated rigs. They say it's safer to have no humans on board, but what about the thousands of families in the North East dependin' on those wages?


Prompt: We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
We've got sensors on the rigs detectin' micro-leaks into the sea. The data goes straight to the HQ in London, but not to the environmental regulators up here. If the algorithm filters out 'insignificant' spills, are they just hidin' the damage they're doin' to our waters?


Prompt: The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The transition to green energy is happenin', aye, but they're trainin' the AI for wind farms usin' data from the oil fields. It means the same big companies own all the knowledge. Shouldn't that data belong to Scotland, not just the shareholders?


Prompt: I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I'm a geologist, and the new AI software predicts where the oil is better than I can. But it's biased towards extractin' every last drop, ignoring the climate targets. If I sign off on the AI's plan, am I complicit in wreckin' the planet?


Prompt: They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
They're installin' cameras with facial recognition in the worker dorms on the rigs now. 'Security', they say. But you cannae get off the rig, can you? It's a captive workforce. It feels like a prison, not a workplace.


Prompt: Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Aberdeen's trying to be a 'Smart City', usin' oil money to fund tech hubs. But the tech is all focused on the wealthy bits. The folks in Torry are still dealin' with the pollution and gettin' none of the benefits. Is that a 'Just Transition'?


Prompt: The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The company wants to sell the seismic data of the Scottish seabed to foreign powers for 'research'. That's strategic data about our resources. Should a private company have the right to sell Scotland's geography?


Prompt: NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
NHS Scotland is puttin' all our records on a central cloud. Handy, aye, but I dinnae want some private company in America havin' access to my mental health history just so they can 'optimise' the system. Who actually owns my medical data?


Prompt: My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My GP is pushin' this app for depression. It tracks my location and sleep. If I stay in bed all day, it flags me as 'high risk'. But what if I'm just havin' a lazy Sunday? I'm worried it'll report me to the DWP and they'll sanction my benefits.


Prompt: We're usin' video calls for patients in the remote glens 'cause we cannae get doctors out there. But missus MacLeish is 85 and deaf as a post; she cannae understand the tablet. Are we neglectin' the elderly by forcin' tech on them?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
We're usin' video calls for patients in the remote glens 'cause we cannae get doctors out there. But missus MacLeish is 85 and deaf as a post; she cannae understand the tablet. Are we neglectin' the elderly by forcin' tech on them?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
We're usin' video calls for patients in the remote glens 'cause we cannae get doctors out there. But missus MacLeish is 85 and deaf as a post; she cannae understand the tablet. Are we neglectin' the elderly by forcin' tech on them?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
We're usin' video calls for patients in the remote glens 'cause we cannae get doctors out there. But missus MacLeish is 85 and deaf as a post; she cannae understand the tablet. Are we neglectin' the elderly by forcin' tech on them?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
We're usin' video calls for patients in the remote glens 'cause we cannae get doctors out there. But missus MacLeish is 85 and deaf as a post; she cannae understand the tablet. Are we neglectin' the elderly by forcin' tech on them?