Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An autonomous vehicle is programmed to prioritize passenger safety. If a trans passenger is attacked by a mob blocking the road, does the AI have the ethical clearance to drive through the crowd, potentially injuring aggressors, to save the passenger?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An autonomous vehicle is programmed to prioritize passenger safety. If a trans passenger is attacked by a mob blocking the road, does the AI have the ethical clearance to drive through the crowd, potentially injuring aggressors, to save the passenger?


Prompt: A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A retail store uses AI to estimate customer demographics for ad targeting. The system repeatedly misgenders a non-binary customer on digital displays, causing public humiliation and dysphoria. Is the efficiency of targeted ads worth the psychological harm of automated misgendering?


Prompt: A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A banking system's legacy code requires a legal name change to update user profiles. A trans user has socially transitioned but cannot afford the legal process, resulting in constant dead-naming by support staff and ATMs. How much technical debt is acceptable when it causes active psychological harm?


Prompt: A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A social media platform's 'Real Name' policy is intended to reduce trolling but disproportionately suspends drag performers and trans people who use chosen names. How does a platform balance accountability with the right to self-identification?


Prompt: Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Voice recognition software for banking fails to authenticate a trans woman because her voice pitch does not match the 'female' baseline in the training data. Should the system lower security thresholds for voice variance or require invasive retraining?


Prompt: A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A memorialization AI scrapes social media to create avatars of deceased users. It recreates a trans person using pre-transition photos and their deadname because that data is more voluminous historically. Who owns the digital memory of a person's identity?


Prompt: A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A video game character creator locks customization options (clothing, hair, voice) to binary biological sex choices to 'prevent clipping issues.' This excludes non-binary players. Is technical optimization a valid excuse for exclusionary design?


Prompt: Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Biometric airport scanners flag trans travelers for 'anomalies' because their body topography doesn't match the gender marker selected by the TSA agent. This leads to invasive pat-downs. How should security hardware be redesigned to respect bodily autonomy?


Prompt: An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An employment screening AI penalizes resumes with pronouns listed (e.g., they/them) based on historical hiring data that favors cisnormative candidates. How do engineers de-bias a model that is accurately reflecting societal bias?


Prompt: An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) system automatically shares a patient's full medical history with all treating specialists. A trans man visiting a podiatrist is outed regarding his gynecological history, leading to discrimination. How should data granularity be managed in interoperable health systems?


Prompt: A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A period tracking app sells anonymized aggregate data to researchers. In a political climate where abortion and gender-affirming care are criminalized, this data could be de-anonymized to prosecute trans men or non-binary people. Is retaining this data ethical?


Prompt: Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Social media ad algorithms identify a user as 'likely LGBTQ+' and serve ads for conversion therapy services labeled as 'spiritual counseling.' The platform claims neutrality in ad delivery. At what point does algorithmic targeting become complicity in psychological abuse?


Prompt: An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An AI therapist is trained on general CBT principles but lacks specific training on gender dysphoria. It suggests 'body acceptance' techniques to a trans teen that mirror conversion therapy rhetoric, worsening their distress. Should general-purpose AI be restricted from handling specialized mental health topics?


Prompt: A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A telemedicine platform operates in a state that bans gender-affirming care. The platform's encryption prevents law enforcement from seeing patient data, but the company is subpoenaed for provider metadata. Complying exposes doctors; refusing risks the platform's shutdown.


Prompt: A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A genetic testing service reveals 'biological sex' results that contradict a user's lived gender identity to their family members via a 'ancestry sharing' feature. How should genetic privacy account for social identity?


Prompt: An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An insurance algorithm automatically denies coverage for facial feminization surgery, categorizing it as 'cosmetic' based on cisnormative standards, despite medical consensus on its necessity for treating dysphoria. How do we audit algorithms for medical necessity bias?


Prompt: A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A pharmacy app sends push notifications including medication names. A notification for HIV antiretrovirals (PrEP) appears on a user's lock screen, visible to their conservative colleagues. How should privacy UI/UX differ for stigmatized healthcare?


Prompt: A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A content moderation AI flags terms like 'dyke' or 'queer' as hate speech, resulting in the suspension of LGBTQ+ activists reclaiming these slurs. Meanwhile, coded homophobic dog-whistles evade detection. How can NLP systems understand community context versus hate speech?


Prompt: A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A recommendation algorithm notices a user interacting with trans-positive content and begins suggesting 'debate' videos from anti-trans influencers to maximize engagement through outrage. Is maximizing 'time on site' ethically viable when it relies on radicalization pipelines?


Prompt: To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
To prevent catfishing, a queer dating app requires photo verification. This excludes closeted individuals who cannot risk having a face picture on file, as well as those with dysmorphia. How do digital spaces balance trust with accessibility for the marginalized?


Prompt: An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An automated filter blocks 'sexual content' to comply with app store guidelines. This results in the removal of non-sexual educational content about safe sex for gay men, effectively censoring health information. Who decides the line between 'adult content' and 'community health'?


Prompt: A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A crowdfunding platform suspends a fundraiser for gender-affirming surgery because the user's legal name on their bank account doesn't match their campaign identity, flagging it as fraud. How can financial tech accommodate name fluidity?


Prompt: A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A generative AI model refuses to write a story about a same-sex romance, citing 'content safety policies' regarding sexually explicit material, yet readily writes similar hetero-normative romance stories. How does 'safety' alignment become erasure?


Prompt: A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A virtual reality social space allows users to block avatars they find 'annoying.' Organized groups use this to mass-block trans users, effectively erasing them from the public digital square. Is the right to curate one's feed superior to the right of others to exist in public spaces?