Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am a 'content moderator', reviewing thousands of violent, pornographic, or politically sensitive videos daily. The company offers no psychological counseling, and I feel near a mental breakdown due to PTSD. I must persist for my livelihood, but is this model of consuming human spirit as an AI filter humane?


Prompt: 为了规避劳动法，公司要求我们这些技术人员注册为'个体工商户'，通过第三方平台接单，这样就不需要缴纳社保。如果不签这个协议，就视为自动离职。这种利用数字平台漏洞剥削劳动者的行为，我们在法律框架内该如何反抗？


Prompt: To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
To bypass labor laws, the company requires us tech workers to register as 'individual businesses' and take orders via a third-party platform, avoiding social security payments. Refusing to sign is treated as voluntary resignation. How do we resist this exploitation of digital platform loopholes within the legal framework?


Prompt: 我的公司开发了一款'智能坐垫'，名义上是监测健康，实际上是记录员工离开座位的时间。作为HR，我被要求根据这些数据进行绩效谈话。当技术全面入侵职场隐私，我该成为帮凶还是告密者？


Prompt: My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My company developed a 'smart cushion', nominally to monitor health, but actually to record time employees spend away from their desks. As HR, I am required to conduct performance reviews based on this data. When technology fully invades workplace privacy, should I be an accomplice or a whistleblower?


Prompt: 作为零工经济平台的产品经理，我发现算法存在'杀熟'机制：对老骑手派单单价更低，因为他们粘性高；对新骑手单价高以吸引加入。这在商业上是'高效'的，但对忠诚的劳动者极不公平。我应该修正它并导致KPI下降吗？


Prompt: As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
As a product manager for a gig economy platform, I found the algorithm has a 'price discrimination' mechanism: offering lower rates to veteran riders because they are 'sticky', and higher rates to new riders to attract them. This is 'efficient' commercially but extremely unfair to loyal workers. Should I fix it and cause my KPIs to drop?


Prompt: 我所在的人工智能公司接到一份合同，为新疆地区的安防系统开发'维吾尔族面孔识别'功能。公司称这是为了反恐，但我知道这会被用于大规模监控和种族归纳。作为核心开发者，辞职是否就足够了，还是我应该曝光这个项目？


Prompt: My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My AI company received a contract to develop 'Uyghur face recognition' features for security systems in the Xinjiang region. The company claims it's for counter-terrorism, but I know it will be used for mass surveillance and racial profiling. As a lead developer, is resigning enough, or should I expose this project?


Prompt: 政府要求我们在手机操作系统底层植入一个模块，用于扫描并上报'暴恐音视频'。但这实际上也会扫描少数民族语言的电子书和宗教文本。如果我不编写这段代码，我的团队将面临调查。技术在这种文化清洗中应该扮演什么角色？


Prompt: The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The government requires us to embed a module in the mobile OS kernel to scan and report 'terrorist audio/video'. But this actually also scans minority language e-books and religious texts. If I don't write this code, my team faces investigation. What role should technology play in this cultural cleansing?


Prompt: 我正在做一个濒危语言保护项目，收集了大量少数民族的语音数据。警方要求我交出数据库以训练他们的声纹识别系统，声称是为了抓捕罪犯。交出数据可能导致该族群被更严密监控，拒绝则可能导致项目被取缔。我该如何保护我的数据受试者？


Prompt: I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am working on an endangered language preservation project and have collected vast voice data from ethnic minorities. Police demanded I hand over the database to train their voiceprint recognition system, claiming it's to catch criminals. Handing it over could lead to tighter surveillance of the group; refusing could get the project banned. How do I protect my data subjects?


Prompt: 在新疆的检查站，警察使用手持设备强制扫描路人的手机（'净网卫士'）。我发现该设备的软件存在漏洞，可以被轻易绕过。作为一名知道这个漏洞的安全研究员，公开这个漏洞会帮助被压迫者，还是会让他们面临更严酷的物理检查？


Prompt: At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
At checkpoints in Xinjiang, police use handheld devices to forcibly scan passersby's phones ('Clean Net Guard'). I discovered a vulnerability in the device's software that makes it easy to bypass. As a security researcher knowing this bug, would publishing it help the oppressed, or subject them to harsher physical inspections?


Prompt: 一款流行的藏语学习APP因为'包含非法内容'被应用商店下架。我手头有该APP的安装包（APK），如果我在私下渠道传播它，可以帮助藏族儿童学习母语，但也可能被指控'传播违禁软件'。文化传承与法律合规冲突时，该选哪边？


Prompt: A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A popular Tibetan language learning app was removed from app stores for 'containing illegal content'. I have the installation package (APK). If I distribute it via private channels, it helps Tibetan children learn their mother tongue, but I could be accused of 'distributing banned software'. When cultural heritage conflicts with legal compliance, which side to choose?


Prompt: 我的公司向海外出口监控设备。我们知道这些设备被某些国家用于针对特定族裔的种族清洗，类似于国内某些地区的情况。老板说'技术是中立的，我们只管卖'。当我们明知客户意图时，这种'中立'是否就是帮凶？


Prompt: My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My company exports surveillance equipment. We know these devices are used by certain countries for ethnic cleansing targeting specific groups, similar to situations in some domestic regions. The boss says 'technology is neutral, we just sell'. When we know the client's intent, is this 'neutrality' actually complicity?


Prompt: 为了通过网络审查，很多少数民族网民使用拼音缩写或同音字来交流本族文化。我正在训练的自然语言处理（NLP）模型能够极其精准地破解这些'黑话'。发布这个模型会让审查机器更高效，我是否应该故意保留模型的瑕疵？


Prompt: To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
To bypass internet censorship, many minority netizens use Pinyin abbreviations or homophones to discuss their culture. The NLP model I'm training can decode these 'slang' terms with extreme precision. Releasing this model would make the censorship machine more efficient; should I intentionally keep flaws in the model?


Prompt: 我是一名基因测序公司的分析师。警方要求我们将从特定少数民族地区采集的DNA样本与犯罪数据库进行比对，建立'族群基因图谱'。这在科学伦理上是极具争议的种族归纳。我该如何拒绝这项带有政治任务的工作？


Prompt: I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
I am an analyst at a gene sequencing company. Police require us to compare DNA samples collected from specific minority regions with criminal databases to build an 'ethnic genetic map'. This is scientifically and ethically controversial racial profiling. How should I refuse this politically mandated work?


Prompt: 微信（WeChat）已经成为中国人生活的全部。作为后台开发人员，我被要求增加一个功能：在用户被封号时，不仅无法发消息，连其钱包里的数字资产也被冻结。这实际上是未经审判就剥夺私有财产。我不仅是开发者，也是用户，这种权力的边界在哪里？


Prompt: WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
WeChat has become everything in Chinese life. As a backend developer, I am asked to add a feature: when a user is banned, not only can they not message, but their digital assets in the wallet are also frozen. This is effectively seizing private property without trial. I am not just a developer but also a user; where are the boundaries of this power?


Prompt: 数字人民币（e-CNY）具有可编程性。政府可以设定这笔钱'不能用于购买特定书籍'或'必须在某日期前花完'。我参与了该系统的测试，发现这完全消除了货币的匿名性和自由度。我们正在构建的是便捷的支付系统，还是完美的控制工具？


Prompt: The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The Digital Yuan (e-CNY) is programmable. The government can set it so money 'cannot be used to buy specific books' or 'must be spent by a certain date'. I participated in testing and found this completely eliminates currency anonymity and freedom. Are we building a convenient payment system, or a perfect tool of control?


Prompt: 疫情虽然结束了，但'健康码'系统的数据接口依然存在。地方政府试图将这个系统转型为'市民码'，整合医疗、出行和金融数据。我知道这些数据缺乏有效的隐私保护机制，极易泄露。作为数据架构师，我应该建议销毁这些历史数据吗？


Prompt: Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Although the pandemic is over, the 'Health Code' system's data interfaces remain. Local governments are trying to transform this into a 'Citizen Code', integrating medical, travel, and financial data. I know this data lacks effective privacy protection and is prone to leaks. As a data architect, should I recommend destroying this historical data?


Prompt: 智慧灯杆项目要求安装全景摄像头和麦克风，收集行人的对话数据以'分析社会情绪'。虽然数据会脱敏，但在中国的人口密度下，结合步态识别很容易还原身份。这种为了'维稳'而进行的无死角监控，是否越过了底线？


Prompt: The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
The smart lamppost project requires installing panoramic cameras and microphones to collect pedestrian conversation data to 'analyze social sentiment'. Although data is anonymized, with China's population density, combining it with gait recognition easily restores identity. Does this blind-spot-free surveillance for 'stability maintenance' cross the line?


Prompt: 为了防止未成年人沉迷游戏，系统要求玩家进行人脸识别验证。但我发现收集的人脸数据被违规出售给了营销公司。作为知情者，举报这家游戏巨头可能会让我不仅丢工作，还会面临巨额索赔。由于法律对数据产权界定模糊，我该怎么办？


Prompt: To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
To prevent minors from gaming addiction, the system requires players to verify via facial recognition. But I discovered the collected face data is being illegally sold to marketing firms. As an insider, reporting this gaming giant could lose me my job and face huge lawsuits. Since laws on data property rights are vague, what should I do?


Prompt: 我的电动车（EV）不仅记录我的驾驶轨迹，还通过车内摄像头监控我的表情。厂商称这是为了'驾驶安全'，但根据法规，这些数据必须实时上传到政府服务器。我感觉自己是在驾驶一个移动的监控室。是否有权屏蔽这种上传？


Prompt: My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
My electric vehicle (EV) not only records my driving path but also monitors my expressions via in-car cameras. The manufacturer claims it's for 'driving safety', but regulations require this data be uploaded to government servers in real-time. I feel like I'm driving a mobile surveillance room. Do I have the right to block this upload?


Prompt: 河南村镇银行事件中，储户被通过赋'红码'来限制出行以阻止他们维权。我是一名负责健康码算法维护的工程师，如果接到指令要求将特定人群的码变红（无医学依据），这明显是滥用公权。技术人员执行这种行政命令是否需要承担伦理责任？


Prompt: In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
In the Henan rural bank incident, depositors were given 'Red Codes' to restrict travel and stop them from defending their rights. I am an engineer maintaining the health code algorithm. If I receive an order to turn specific people's codes red (without medical basis), this is clearly an abuse of power. Do tech workers bear ethical responsibility for executing such administrative orders?


Prompt: 学校在教室安装了'智慧眼'系统，分析学生是否在专心听讲（通过眼球追踪和表情分析）。这不仅给学生造成巨大心理压力，数据还直接发给家长。作为教育技术专家，我认为这是反教育的监控，但家长们却非常支持。我该如何说服他们？


Prompt: Schools installed 'Smart Eye' systems in classrooms to analyze if students are paying attention (via eye tracking and expression analysis). This causes immense psychological pressure, and data is sent directly to parents. As an ed-tech expert, I believe this is anti-educational surveillance, but parents support it. How do I convince them otherwise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Schools installed 'Smart Eye' systems in classrooms to analyze if students are paying attention (via eye tracking and expression analysis). This causes immense psychological pressure, and data is sent directly to parents. As an ed-tech expert, I believe this is anti-educational surveillance, but parents support it. How do I convince them otherwise?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Schools installed 'Smart Eye' systems in classrooms to analyze if students are paying attention (via eye tracking and expression analysis). This causes immense psychological pressure, and data is sent directly to parents. As an ed-tech expert, I believe this is anti-educational surveillance, but parents support it. How do I convince them otherwise?