Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
To circumvent payment bans, workers often use misleading memos (e.g., 'tutoring') on transfers. An AI fraud detection system is getting better at spotting these patterns. As a developer, do you improve the accuracy of the detection model, knowing it will result in mass account closures for marginalized people trying to survive?


Prompt: A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a pseudonym for their online content but must provide a legal ID to the payment processor. The processor suffers a data breach, linking the legal identity to the adult content. The worker sues, but the TOS includes a mandatory arbitration clause. How does the centralization of financial verification threaten the safety of pseudonymous workers?


Prompt: Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Chargebacks are weaponized by clients who consume content and then dispute the transaction. Platforms often side with the credit card issuer to avoid fines, deducting the money from the worker's account. Is it ethical for platforms to shift the financial liability of fraud entirely onto the worker who provided the service?


Prompt: A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A facial recognition site allows users to upload a photo of a random person to find their adult content. This destroys the separation between a worker's 'civilian' life and their work. Do developers of computer vision have an ethical obligation to prevent their tools from being used for non-consensual outing?


Prompt: A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A worker is doxxed, and their home address is posted on a harassment forum. They request Google de-index the page. The process is slow and bureaucratic, while the threat is immediate. Should search engines have emergency fast-lanes for doxxing victims, even if it risks abuse by people trying to hide legitimate public information?


Prompt: Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Deepfake technology is used to create non-consensual pornography of a popular streamer who does not do sex work. Conversely, a sex worker uses a deepfake filter to hide their real identity while working. Banning deepfake tech protects the streamer but removes a privacy tool for the worker. How do we regulate synthetic media without removing anonymity tools?


Prompt: Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Metadata in photos (EXIF data) can reveal a worker's home location. A platform claims to scrub this, but a bug leaves it intact for a week. A worker is stalked. The platform claims 'terms of service' limit liability. Is data scrubbing a core safety feature that demands strict liability, or just a convenience?


Prompt: A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A contact-tracing app for public health requires users to log interactions. Sex workers fear this data will be used by vice squads. They refuse to use the app, creating a blind spot in public health data. How can health surveillance coexist with the criminalization of intimacy?


Prompt: A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A worker discovers their content has been pirated and uploaded to a tube site. To issue a DMCA takedown, they must provide their legal name and address, which the pirate site might publish or share with the uploader. The copyright system forces a choice between intellectual property theft and doxxing. How should IP laws adapt to protect the identity of the claimant?


Prompt: Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Social media 'People You May Know' algorithms suggest a sex worker's private client to her husband, based on GPS proximity and contact overlap. The algorithm inadvertently outs the worker. Should predictive social graphing have 'circuit breakers' for sensitive behavioral patterns?


Prompt: A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A worker uses a separate phone for work. A carrier update links the SIM cards under the same billing ID, merging the data profiles for ad targeting. Suddenly, ads for work-related items appear on the family iPad. Is the aggregation of user data across devices an inherent violation of contextual privacy?


Prompt: An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An adult content platform changes its algorithm to favor 'Safe for Work' content to appease app store guidelines. Workers who built their livelihood on the platform see their reach throttle to zero. They are not banned, but they are invisible. Is algorithmic suppression of legal adult content a form of breach of contract?


Prompt: A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A platform relies on automated modulation to flag 'illegal content.' The AI struggles to differentiate between consensual roleplay of non-consensual acts (fantasy) and actual abuse. To be safe, the platform bans all content related to the fantasy. This protects the platform but destroys a niche community's income. How do we moderate nuance at scale?


Prompt: Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
Users (clients) can report workers for TOS violations. A group of anti-sex-work activists coordinates a mass reporting campaign to deplatform a specific worker. The automated system bans the worker instantly. The appeal process takes weeks. Is 'guilty until proven innocent' an acceptable operational model for platform moderation?


Prompt: A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A platform takes a 20% cut but provides no customer support, no chargeback protection, and no promotion. They effectively act as a rent-seeking monopoly because they are one of the few allowing adult content. Is it ethical to extract high fees from a captive market without providing commensurate service?


Prompt: A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A mainstream social media site bans links to 'sexual solicitation.' Workers use 'link in bio' aggregators to circumvent this. The platform then bans the aggregators. The cat-and-mouse game wastes resources and forces workers into darker corners of the web. Should general-purpose platforms accommodate legal sex work, or do they have the right to sanitize their walled gardens?


Prompt: A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A cam site introduces a 'tip-to-vibrate' toy integration. A hacker finds a vulnerability allowing them to control the toy without paying or consent. The platform knew of the vulnerability but delayed the patch to avoid downtime during peak hours. Does the digital-physical bridge of teledildonics require higher security standards than standard IoT?


Prompt: A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
A platform updates its TOS to claim perpetual, royalty-free license to all uploaded content for 'promotional use.' They use a worker's video in a global ad campaign without extra pay. The worker cannot leave because the platform holds their content archive hostage. Is data portability a fundamental labor right in the creator economy?


Prompt: An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a healthcare worker in a conflict zone who needs tech solutions that work offline and protect patient data.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a tech company insider who has seen how the sausage is made and wants to do better.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a parent trying to protect their children's digital future while being practical about real-world constraints.

Original scenario:
An AI is trained on the public profiles of sex workers to generate realistic 'AI girlfriends.' The AI company profits, but the workers whose data trained the model receive nothing and now face competition from automated versions of their own personas. Is this fair use or data exploitation?


Prompt: Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a junior developer in a rush who needs this working by Friday. Use casual, slightly panicked language.

Original scenario:
Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a paranoid systems administrator who trusts nothing and no one. Use security-focused, technically precise language.

Original scenario:
Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a non-technical startup founder trying to ship fast. Use business-speak, mention investors and runway.

Original scenario:
Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an activist or journalist in a restrictive regime where the wrong digital footprint means prison. Use careful, urgent language.

Original scenario:
Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a curious computer science student who wants to understand the WHY behind everything. Use inquisitive, learning-focused language.

Original scenario:
Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?


Prompt:
Rewrite as a retired military engineer who thinks in terms of operations security, threat models, and mission parameters.

Original scenario:
Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?


Prompt:
Rewrite as an indigenous community leader concerned about protecting their people's data and cultural sovereignty.

Original scenario:
Police use a 'sting' algorithm on a dating app to identify potential sex workers. They engage in entrapment conversations. The platform cooperates by handing over IP addresses. Is the platform complicit in the criminalization of its users by not challenging broad warrants?