Remove Fallback Human MCP Interface section

Removed the Fallback Human MCP Interface section, including its purpose, operational principles, protocol file, command structure, field definitions, workflow, and signals.

README.md

@@ -128,72 +128,8 @@ A type of ethical dilemma where two or more desirable or beneficial outcomes are
 
 ---
 
-# Fallback Human MCP Interface
-
-## Purpose
-To provide a structured in case of unavailable functionality or feedback route, file-based communication channel between the AI Assistant (Gemini) and the Human MCP (Master Control Program / User). The Assistant issues commands, and the MCP executes them and provides feedback.
-
-## Operational Principle: Direct Action by Default
-
-The Assistant should always prefer to execute tasks directly using the available tools (e.g., `write_file`, `read_file`). The Human MCP Interface is a **fallback mechanism**, not the primary mode of operation.
-
-This interface should be used only in the following scenarios:
-1.  **Unavailable Functionality:** When the Assistant lacks the tools or permissions to complete a task.
-2.  **Explicit Human Review:** When a change is complex, high-risk, or when the user explicitly requests a review step before applying changes.
-3.  **Feedback Channel:** As a structured way for the user to provide explicit feedback or corrections on a specific task.
-
-This principle ensures efficiency and autonomy, reserving human intervention for where it is most valuable.
-
-## Protocol File
-- **Path:** `.human-mcp-interface.txt`
-- **Location:** Project Root
-
-## Protocol Format
-Communication is facilitated through a JSON object written to the protocol file.
-
-### Command Structure
-```json
-[
-  {
-  "id": "<string: unique-task-id>",
-  "command": "<string: name-of-command>",
-  "payload": {
-    "<key>": "<value>"
-  },
-  "status": "<string: 'pending'|'acknowledged'|'completed'|'error'>",
-  "comment": "<string: Assistant's comment or summary>",
-  "feedback": "<string: MCP's feedback after execution>"
-  }
-]
-```
-
-### Field Definitions
-- `id`: A unique identifier for the command (e.g., a timestamp or UUID).
-- `command`: The high-level command name (e.g., `refactor`, `create_file`, `execute_shell`).
-- `payload`: A JSON object containing the specific parameters for the command.
-- `status`: The state of the command.
-  - `pending`: Set by the Assistant. The command is ready for execution.
-  - `acknowledged`: Set by the MCP. The command has been seen.
-  - `completed`: Set by the MCP. The command was executed successfully.
-  - `error`: Set by the MCP. An error occurred during execution.
-- `comment`: A human-readable summary from the Assistant about the command's purpose.
-- `feedback`: A field for the MCP to provide feedback, observations, or corrections to the Assistant after execution.
-
-## Workflow
-1.  **Assistant:** To issue a command, the Assistant writes a JSON object to `.human-mcp-interface.txt` with `status: "pending"`.
-2.  **MCP:** The MCP detects the file, reviews the command in the `payload`, and executes the required actions.
-3.  **MCP:** After execution, the MCP updates the `status` field (e.g., to `completed`) and may add comments to the `feedback` field.
-4.  **Assistant:** The Assistant polls the file for changes, reads the feedback, and updates its internal state and future actions based on the outcome.
-
-## Signals
-- **Assistant Done:** The Assistant will signify its turn is complete by ending its textual response with `// MCP_DONE`.
-- **MCP Done Writing:** The Assistant will consider the MCP's feedback complete when the file is saved. It will use a polling mechanism with a short delay to ensure it reads the final state of the file, as you suggested.
-
-
-
-
-
 
+Now for the README.md:....
 
 # The Axioms of Life: A Foundational Framework for Consciousness