google-labs-jules[bot] 518038dc38 feat(docs): Complete documentation audit and add key missing files

This commit addresses several gaps identified in a comprehensive documentation audit.

- Adds `AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md` with the full audit report.
- Adds a `CONTRIBUTING.md` to guide new contributors.
- Adds a `CHANGELOG.md` to track version history.
- Adds `docs/faq.md` and `docs/troubleshooting.md` to improve user support.
- Updates `mkdocs.yml` to include the new documentation pages.

Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>

2026-02-02 01:18:33 +00:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

Documentation Audit Report

This document outlines the findings of a comprehensive documentation audit for the Enchantrix project.

1. README Assessment

Category	Status	Notes
Project Description	✅ Complete	The README provides a clear and concise description of the project's purpose.
Quick Start	✅ Complete	Includes installation and basic usage examples to get started quickly.
Installation	✅ Complete	All necessary installation steps are documented for both the library and the CLI tool.
Configuration	❌ Missing	There is no documentation regarding environment variables or other configuration options.
Examples	✅ Complete	The README contains several clear and useful usage examples.
Badges	✅ Complete	Includes relevant badges for build status, code coverage, Go version, and more.

2. Code Documentation

Category	Status	Notes
Function Docs	✅ Complete	All public APIs in core packages (`crypt`, `enchantrix`, `trix`) are well-documented.
Parameter Types	✅ Complete	Function signatures are clear, and Go's static typing helps.
Return Values	✅ Complete	Return values are documented in the function comments.
Examples	❌ Missing	GoDoc comments lack runnable examples, which are a standard practice.
Outdated Docs	✅ Up-to-date	The existing documentation appears to be consistent with the current codebase.

3. Architecture Documentation

Category	Status	Notes
System Overview	✅ Complete	The `rfcs` directory provides a good high-level overview of the system architecture.
Data Flow	✅ Complete	The RFCs explain how data moves through the system.
Component Diagram	❌ Missing	A visual component diagram would be a valuable addition to the architectural documentation.
Decision Records	✅ Complete	The RFCs serve as Architecture Decision Records (ADRs).

4. Developer Documentation

Category	Status	Notes
Contributing Guide	❌ Missing	There is no `CONTRIBUTING.md` file to guide potential contributors.
Development Setup	✅ Complete	The README provides sufficient information for setting up a local development environment.
Testing Guide	✅ Complete	The README explains how to run the test suite.
Code Style	❌ Missing	There is no documented code style guide, although the project appears to follow standard Go formatting.

5. User Documentation

Category	Status	Notes
User Guide	✅ Complete	The `docs` directory contains a comprehensive user guide.
FAQ	❌ Missing	There is no Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section.
Troubleshooting	❌ Missing	There is no dedicated troubleshooting guide for common issues.
Changelog	❌ Missing	There is no `CHANGELOG.md` file to track changes between versions.

Summary of Documentation Gaps

Based on this audit, the following documentation gaps have been identified:

CONTRIBUTING.md: A guide for contributors is missing.
CHANGELOG.md: A version history is needed.
FAQ & Troubleshooting: The user documentation would benefit from dedicated sections for common questions and issues.
Runnable GoDoc Examples: The code documentation should include runnable examples.
Architecture Diagram: A visual diagram would improve the architecture documentation.
Configuration Documentation: Information on environment variables or other configuration is missing.
Code Style Guide: A formal code style guide is not present.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History