This commit introduces a comprehensive audit of the project's documentation. The audit is saved in the `AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md` file and covers the following areas: - README Assessment - Code Documentation - Architecture Documentation - Developer Documentation - User Documentation The report identifies several gaps in the documentation and provides a summary of recommended improvements. Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
3.6 KiB
3.6 KiB
Documentation Audit Report
README Assessment
| Category | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Project Description | ✅ Pass | The README provides a clear and concise description of the project's purpose. |
| Quick Start | ✅ Pass | The "Quick Start" section is excellent, offering a Docker command for immediate setup. |
| Installation | ✅ Pass | Multiple installation methods are documented (Docker, CLI, source). |
| Configuration | ✅ Pass | Configuration is explained with a clear example of a JSON profile. |
| Examples | ✅ Pass | The README includes usage examples for Docker, the CLI, and the web component. |
| Badges | ✅ Pass | A comprehensive set of badges is present, covering build status, coverage, and versioning. |
Overall: The README.md is comprehensive and user-friendly.
Code Documentation
| Category | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Function Docs | ✅ Pass | Public APIs are well-documented with clear explanations. |
| Parameter Types | ✅ Pass | Go's static typing ensures parameter types are documented. |
| Return Values | ✅ Pass | Return values are documented in the function comments. |
| Examples | ❌ Fail | There are no runnable examples in the Go docstrings. |
| Outdated Docs | ✅ Pass | The documentation appears to be up-to-date with the code. |
Overall: The code is well-documented, but could be improved by adding runnable examples in the docstrings, which would be automatically included in the GoDoc.
Architecture Documentation
| Category | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| System Overview | ✅ Pass | docs/ARCHITECTURE.md provides a high-level overview of the system. |
| Data Flow | ✅ Pass | The architecture document includes a sequence diagram illustrating data flow. |
| Component Diagram | ✅ Pass | A Mermaid diagram visually represents the system's components. |
| Decision Records | ❌ Fail | There are no Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) present. |
Overall: The architecture is well-documented, but would benefit from ADRs to track key decisions.
Developer Documentation
| Category | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Contributing Guide | ✅ Pass | The README.md and docs/DEVELOPMENT.md provide clear contribution instructions. |
| Development Setup | ✅ Pass | Prerequisites and setup steps are documented. |
| Testing Guide | ✅ Pass | The docs/DEVELOPMENT.md file explains how to run tests. |
| Code Style | 🟠 Partial | A formal code style guide is missing, but make lint and make fmt are provided. |
Overall: Developer documentation is good, but a formal style guide would be a useful addition.
User Documentation
| Category | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| User Guide | ✅ Pass | The MkDocs site serves as a comprehensive user guide. |
| FAQ | ❌ Fail | A dedicated FAQ section is missing. |
| Troubleshooting | ✅ Pass | A troubleshooting guide is available in the documentation. |
| Changelog | ✅ Pass | CHANGELOG.md is present and well-maintained. |
Overall: User documentation is strong, but could be improved with a FAQ section.
Summary of Documentation Gaps
The following documentation gaps have been identified:
- Code Documentation:
- Add runnable examples to Go docstrings to improve GoDoc.
- Architecture Documentation:
- Introduce Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document key architectural decisions.
- Developer Documentation:
- Create a formal code style guide to ensure consistency.
- User Documentation:
- Add a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section to the user guide.